Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Inflammation From Celiac Disease?


ProutyA

Recommended Posts

ProutyA Newbie

My niece had a biopsy last week. She is 3 years old and suffers from tummy aches and has chronic anemia.

Several relatives do not eat gluten because they feel better when they don't. Nobody has been diagnosed.

The results of the biopsy show her small intestine is inflamed and the doctor says she does not have celiac. I thought the small intestine gets inflamed from celiac. Am I wrong?

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Gemini Experienced
My niece had a biopsy last week. She is 3 years old and suffers from tummy aches and has chronic anemia.

Several relatives do not eat gluten because they feel better when they don't. Nobody has been diagnosed.

The results of the biopsy show her small intestine is inflamed and the doctor says she does not have celiac. I thought the small intestine gets inflamed from celiac. Am I wrong?

Thanks!

No, you are not wrong. This is the type of ignorant doctoring that I will never understand. Your intestines will become inflamed first, sometimes for years and then when enough damage has been done, the villi start to go. That could take a long time to happen too, depending upon the person. Doing a biopsy on a 3 year old and then saying it isn't Celiac because they could not find damamged villi yet is plain stupid. If that child continued to eat gluten, then maybe down the road there would be the proof the doctor is looking for but why would any parent in their right mind do that?

Plus, when it is ever normal for a 3 year old to suffer from chronic anemia? Your niece is most likely a Celiac and a trial diet should give some answers. It's no small wonder only 3% of the population are diagnosed!

CeliBelli Newbie

I agree with Gemini, you are not wrong. More questions need to be asked, and a second opinion obtained. If this is not celiac disease, then what is the doctor's diagnosis of the inflammation? If they cannot answer that, then they have not taken this far enough. At minimum the child should tested to check for the antibodies to gluten, and for the genetic markers for celiac disease. So should the family members who abstain from gluten. This can be done with a simple two-in-one blood test. At minimum the child's parents, grandparents and siblings should be tested.

If any of them test positive, it adds substantial weight to the likelihood the problem is celiac disease. If none of the testing indicates celiac, and the pathology report does not indicate celiac, then the family definitely needs a clear alternative explanation and treatment plan. The risks to a child that young exhibiting celiac symptoms are serious and need diagnosis.

You don't say what type of doctor made the comments you reference. Are they a gastroenterologist? If not, the family needs to find one - a good one - experienced in pediatrics.

Good luck!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,601
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Karen Baumann
    Newest Member
    Karen Baumann
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Alibu
      I was tested back in 2017 and my TTG-IGA was mildly elevated (an 11 with reference range <4) but my EMA was negative and biopsy was negative. Fast forward to 2 weeks ago where I was like y'know what, I still have so many symptoms and I'm always so sick, I should repeat this, thinking it was not going to be positive.  I also found out through 23 and me that I do have the HLA-DQ2.5 gene so I thought it would be good to repeat given my ongoing symptoms. Well my blood work came back with a ttg-iga level of 152.6 with a reference range of <15 and my EMA was positive and EMA titer was 1:10 with reference range of <1:5. I guess I'm nervous that I'm going to do the biopsy and it's going to be negative again, especially since I also had an endoscopy in 2020, not to look for celiac but just as a regular 5 year thing I do because of all my GI issues, and they didn't see anything then either. I have no idea how long the EMA has been positive but I'm wondering if it's very recent, if the biopsy will show damage and if so, if they'll say well the biopsy is the gold standard so it's not celiac? I of course am doing all the things to convince myself that it isn't real. Do a lot of people go through this? I think because back in 2017 my ttg-iga was elevated but not a huge amount and my EMA was negative and my biopsy was negative, I keep thinking this time it's going to be different. But this time my ttg-iga is 152.6 with reference range <15, and my EMA was positive. BUT, my titer is only 1:10 and I keep reading how most people here had a ttg-iga in the hundreds or thousands, and the EMA titer was much higher. So now I am convinced that it was a false positive and when they do the biopsy it'll be negative.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @linnylou73! Are you claiming this based on a reaction or based upon actual testing?
    • linnylou73
      Sams club membermark columbian coffee is either cross contaminated or the pods contain gluten
    • KimMS
    • Scott Adams
      This varies a lot from person to person. I include foods that are not certified gluten-free but are labelled "gluten-free", while super sensitive people only use certified gluten-free. Both types of products have been found to contain gluten, so there are no guarantees either way: It you are in the super sensitive group, eating a whole foods based diet where you prepare everything is the safest bet, but it's also difficult. Eating out is the the most risky, even if a restaurant has a gluten-free menu. I also include items that are naturally gluten-free, for example refried beans, tuna, pasta sauces, salsas, etc., which have a low overall risk of contamination.
×
×
  • Create New...