Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Diagnosis And Statistics

gfp

Recommended Posts

gfp Enthusiast
gfp
Posted
According to the study the mean period of gluten exposure was 2.4 years, although it was likely longer as recent studies have shown that many celiacs are asymptomatic for many years before damage occurs that is severe enough to cause obvious symptoms.

Yet another article proving conslusively thay celiac disease is actually caused by the actual biopsy. ???

Using the biopsy as the gold standard 100% of patients not biopsied did not have celiac disease. So statistically only patients biopsied had celiac disease. The control (blood tests) do not have celiac disease since they didn't have a biopsy.

Meanwhile celaic STARTs with the biopsy, those of us who suffered before the biopsy presumably were making it up since to have celiac disease you must have a biopsy.

This seems like some stupid catch-22. Any study that studies celiac disease has to use the biopsy as a gold standard... (or be ridiculed) and regardless of any other symptoms for it to be called celiac disease they need a biopsy? Every time blood tests are compared its with biopsy as a gold standard and presumed to be 100% reliable...

Am I the only person thinks this is ironic?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


tom Contributor
tom
Posted

The whole thing just pisses me off.

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted
Meanwhile celaic STARTs with the biopsy, those of us who suffered before the biopsy presumably were making it up since to have celiac disease you must have a biopsy.

The whole thing just pisses me off.

Yes it does me, too. :(

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Hopefully someday they will realize that celiac is a 'spectrum' disorder and to only use total villi destruction as a diagnostic proof when so many are effected in so many other ways is frankly inhumane. It's too bad they insist that we be almost dead before they will diagnose, many times our lives are severely impacted long before that occurs.

gfp Enthusiast
gfp
Posted
  • Author
Hopefully someday they will realize that celiac is a 'spectrum' disorder and to only use total villi destruction as a diagnostic proof when so many are effected in so many other ways is frankly inhumane. It's too bad they insist that we be almost dead before they will diagnose, many times our lives are severely impacted long before that occurs.

In your case the damage was both severe and not completely repairable...

I just don't see how if every single study uses biopsy as the only positive that we will ever get to that point.

celiac disease seems to be one of a very select group of diseases that is DEFINED by a test.. and because it has such a high false negative rate any suite of tests where the biopsy is positive and EVERY OTHER test is positve (including dietry response and the patient actualy getting better) they seem happy to throw out every other test...

Its impossible to actually prove the false negatives because the test is definitive... catch-22

cruelshoes Enthusiast
cruelshoes
Posted

I agree that it is frustrating that people have to suffer so long to get a diagnosis. It's really hard sometimes to reconcile making oneself sick to get a positive biopsy.

Hypothetically

An executive decree has just passed and we are now the head of the Celiac Consortium of the World. We have to decide the best way to diagnose people. What would be our proposal? What would strike the ideal balance between diagnosing the right people (not misdiagnosing positive or negative) and keeping the suffering to a minimum? Something that could be scientifically validated I mean, not just a "listen to your body" kind of thing.

This is not a challenge, but a serious question. I too was close to death when I got my diagnosis, and would like to make it so others do not have to go through the same.

motif Contributor
motif
Posted

in my opinion biopsy doesn't make sense, if you feel better without gluten you just go gluten free diet and that's it.

Why to do biopsy? to proof what?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


gfp Enthusiast
gfp
Posted
  • Author
I agree that it is frustrating that people have to suffer so long to get a diagnosis. It's really hard sometimes to reconcile making oneself sick to get a positive biopsy.

Hypothetically

An executive decree has just passed and we are now the head of the Celiac Consortium of the World. We have to decide the best way to diagnose people. What would be our proposal? What would strike the ideal balance between diagnosing the right people (not misdiagnosing positive or negative) and keeping the suffering to a minimum? Something that could be scientifically validated I mean, not just a "listen to your body" kind of thing.

Ok, first thing we need a study BUT that study needs a control.

Italy manages to screen everyone at school.

Scientifically you can't have a perfect test.... you need to have one that has either flase negatives or false positives but screen everyone at school and awareness sky rockets. We need more accurate controls on blood tests, most studies have to presume that celiac disease is so rare in the general population that serology for the general population is used as a control. We need realistic figures for all age groups, not apply a general figure to toddlers...

The next big flaw in most comparitive diagnostic studies is that people actually get gluten-free diets when they say they do. Unfortunately we know this is often not the case.

For a control we ned a set of volunteers who are given only food tested to be 100% gluten-free. Supposing we had the resources we would rent a huge house and gut the kitchens .. make them 100% gluten-free and carry out the tests here. The house would need to be in a area NOT growing wheat...

No food would be allowed in that was not TESTED... (and I mean tested ... full whack GC-MS so the house needs its own lab, sterile of gluten)...

Everyone in the study, controls and not would be fed 100% tested food... we would be tested daily for blood counts .. and the fluctuations mapped.

A second house would house the "eating gluten group". Everyone here would be the "normal test" and also get blood tests daily... anyone who then tests positive would be moved to the gluten-free house and removed from the control group.

JennyC Enthusiast
JennyC
Posted

It frustrates me when people, including doctors, act like the only way to get diagnosed is to have a positive biopsy. More and more it's becoming widely accepted that positive Ttg tests, along with the celiac panel, and positive dietary response are acceptable means of diagnosis. In theory positive Ttg can be associated with other autoimmune disorders, for example some forms of liver failure or autoimmune diabetes, but if you also have the celiac symptoms and they improve on the diet and after time and your Ttg drops, that seems like excellent proof of celiac disease. Sometimes I feel like some people think I sidestepped diagnosis for my son because I did not have him biopsied, but I feel 100% confident in my decision. Can the people who have positive blood work and negative biopsies who go back on gluten say the same?

Jestgar Rising Star
Jestgar
Posted
Scientifically you can't have a perfect test.... you need to have one that has either flase negatives or false positives but screen everyone at school and awareness sky rockets. We need more accurate controls on blood tests, most studies have to presume that celiac disease is so rare in the general population that serology for the general population is used as a control. We need realistic figures for all age groups, not apply a general figure to toddlers...

I have a theoretical test. It would be pricey, if it works at all, but it would be fairly accurate. Unfortunately, it would be difficult to get the money to test it. The medical community accepts only biopsy proven Celiac disease, and I just don't happen to believe that a destroyed intestine is the definition of the disease; it's just one of the symptoms.

Dunno. I've actually been thinking about this for a while. Maybe I'll see if I can get my boss to foot the bill for a few trials (on myself - no biopsy) to see if it would even work.

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted
The medical community accepts only biopsy proven Celiac disease, and I just don't happen to believe that a destroyed intestine is the definition of the disease; it's just one of the symptoms.

I've never heard it put exactly this way before, but yes--that is a perfect explanation. Perhaps, the villi damage is mearly a symptom, and one that some get later rather than sooner.

I hope you get to do your testing, Jess--I would be most interested in hearing about it.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Fiddle-Faddle
Posted

Like many things in the medical community, it comes down to $$$$.

The doctors don't earn a penny if you change your diet and your symptoms go away. Neither does the pharmaceutical industry.

But the doctors, pharm industry, and hospitals/surgical centers all get quite rich just from your endoscopy. The doctors and the pharm industry get even richer when you have to buy meds that supposedly "treat" your symptoms while you continue to eat gluten, thereby causing more and more damage.

The insurance industry, of course, supports this 1005, as they are also funded in part by the pharm industry.

The whole thing is shockingly unethical.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. knitty kitty
      - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens. I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium. I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells. When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly. This is safe...
    2. Jane02
      - Jane02 replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency. I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently...
    3. knitty kitty
      - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      Hello, @Jane02, I take Naturewise D 3. It contains olive oil. Some Vitamin D supplements, like D Drops, are made with fractionated coconut oil which can cause digestive upsets. Fractionated coconut oil is not the same as coconut oil used for cooking. Fractionated coconut oil has been treated for longer shelf life, so it won't go bad in the...
    4. Scott Adams
      0

      Penobscot Bay, Maine: Nurturing Gluten-Free Wellness Retreat with expert celiac dietitian, Melinda Dennis

      until
      Hello! Join me and treat yourself to a four-day, three-night restorative gluten-free retreat in a peaceful, private coastal retreat setting near Penobscot Bay in Maine. Dates: April 10-13, 2026 Enjoy engaging classes...
    5. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product.
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,331
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Kristy2026
    Newest Member
    Kristy2026
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
    • Jane02
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By Jane02 · Posted

      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency.  I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently meet from my diet is vitamin D. Calcium is a hit and miss as I rely on vegetables, dark leafy greens as a major source, for my calcium intake. I'm able to meet it when I either eat or juice a bundle of kale or collard greens daily haha. My thiamine intake is roughly 120% of my needs, although I do recognize that I may not be absorbing all of these nutrients consistently with intermittent unintentional exposures to gluten.  My vitamin A intake is roughly 900% (~6400 mcg/d) of my needs as I eat a lot of sweet potato, although since it's plant-derived vitamin A (beta-carotene) apparently it's not likely to cause toxicity.  Thanks again! 
    • knitty kitty
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Hello, @Jane02,  I take Naturewise D 3.  It contains olive oil.   Some Vitamin D supplements, like D Drops, are made with fractionated coconut oil which can cause digestive upsets.  Fractionated coconut oil is not the same as coconut oil used for cooking.  Fractionated coconut oil has been treated for longer shelf life, so it won't go bad in the jar, and thus may be irritating to the digestive system. I avoid supplements made with soy because many people with Celiac Disease also react to soy.  Mixed tocopherols, an ingredient in Thornes Vitamin D, may be sourced from soy oil.  Kirkland's has soy on its ingredient list. I avoid things that might contain or be exposed to crustaceans, like Metagenics says on its label.  I have a crustacean/shellfish/fish allergy.  I like Life Extension Bioactive Complete B Complex.  I take additional Thiamine B 1 in the form Benfotiamine which helps the intestines heal, Life Extension MegaBenfotiamine. Thiamine is needed to activate Vitamin D.   Low thiamine can make one feel like they are getting glutened after a meal containing lots of simple carbohydrates like white rice, or processed gluten free foods like cookies and pasta.   It's rare to have a single vitamin deficiency.  The water soluble B Complex vitamins should be supplemented together with additional Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine and Thiamine TTFD (tetrahydrofurfuryl disulfide) to correct subclinical deficiencies that don't show up on blood tests.  These are subclinical deficiencies within organs and tissues.  Blood is a transportation system.  The body will deplete tissues and organs in order to keep a supply of thiamine in the bloodstream going to the brain and heart.   If you're low in Vitamin D, you may well be low in other fat soluble vitamins like Vitamin A and Vitamin K. Have you seen a dietician?
    • Scott Adams
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By trents · Posted

      Contact them.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.