Jump to content

  • You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Diagnosis And Statistics

gfp

Recommended Posts

gfp Enthusiast
gfp
Posted
According to the study the mean period of gluten exposure was 2.4 years, although it was likely longer as recent studies have shown that many celiacs are asymptomatic for many years before damage occurs that is severe enough to cause obvious symptoms.

Yet another article proving conslusively thay celiac disease is actually caused by the actual biopsy. ???

Using the biopsy as the gold standard 100% of patients not biopsied did not have celiac disease. So statistically only patients biopsied had celiac disease. The control (blood tests) do not have celiac disease since they didn't have a biopsy.

Meanwhile celaic STARTs with the biopsy, those of us who suffered before the biopsy presumably were making it up since to have celiac disease you must have a biopsy.

This seems like some stupid catch-22. Any study that studies celiac disease has to use the biopsy as a gold standard... (or be ridiculed) and regardless of any other symptoms for it to be called celiac disease they need a biopsy? Every time blood tests are compared its with biopsy as a gold standard and presumed to be 100% reliable...

Am I the only person thinks this is ironic?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


tom Contributor
tom
Posted

The whole thing just pisses me off.

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted
Meanwhile celaic STARTs with the biopsy, those of us who suffered before the biopsy presumably were making it up since to have celiac disease you must have a biopsy.

The whole thing just pisses me off.

Yes it does me, too. :(

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Hopefully someday they will realize that celiac is a 'spectrum' disorder and to only use total villi destruction as a diagnostic proof when so many are effected in so many other ways is frankly inhumane. It's too bad they insist that we be almost dead before they will diagnose, many times our lives are severely impacted long before that occurs.

gfp Enthusiast
gfp
Posted
  • Author
Hopefully someday they will realize that celiac is a 'spectrum' disorder and to only use total villi destruction as a diagnostic proof when so many are effected in so many other ways is frankly inhumane. It's too bad they insist that we be almost dead before they will diagnose, many times our lives are severely impacted long before that occurs.

In your case the damage was both severe and not completely repairable...

I just don't see how if every single study uses biopsy as the only positive that we will ever get to that point.

celiac disease seems to be one of a very select group of diseases that is DEFINED by a test.. and because it has such a high false negative rate any suite of tests where the biopsy is positive and EVERY OTHER test is positve (including dietry response and the patient actualy getting better) they seem happy to throw out every other test...

Its impossible to actually prove the false negatives because the test is definitive... catch-22

cruelshoes Enthusiast
cruelshoes
Posted

I agree that it is frustrating that people have to suffer so long to get a diagnosis. It's really hard sometimes to reconcile making oneself sick to get a positive biopsy.

Hypothetically

An executive decree has just passed and we are now the head of the Celiac Consortium of the World. We have to decide the best way to diagnose people. What would be our proposal? What would strike the ideal balance between diagnosing the right people (not misdiagnosing positive or negative) and keeping the suffering to a minimum? Something that could be scientifically validated I mean, not just a "listen to your body" kind of thing.

This is not a challenge, but a serious question. I too was close to death when I got my diagnosis, and would like to make it so others do not have to go through the same.

motif Contributor
motif
Posted

in my opinion biopsy doesn't make sense, if you feel better without gluten you just go gluten free diet and that's it.

Why to do biopsy? to proof what?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


gfp Enthusiast
gfp
Posted
  • Author
I agree that it is frustrating that people have to suffer so long to get a diagnosis. It's really hard sometimes to reconcile making oneself sick to get a positive biopsy.

Hypothetically

An executive decree has just passed and we are now the head of the Celiac Consortium of the World. We have to decide the best way to diagnose people. What would be our proposal? What would strike the ideal balance between diagnosing the right people (not misdiagnosing positive or negative) and keeping the suffering to a minimum? Something that could be scientifically validated I mean, not just a "listen to your body" kind of thing.

Ok, first thing we need a study BUT that study needs a control.

Italy manages to screen everyone at school.

Scientifically you can't have a perfect test.... you need to have one that has either flase negatives or false positives but screen everyone at school and awareness sky rockets. We need more accurate controls on blood tests, most studies have to presume that celiac disease is so rare in the general population that serology for the general population is used as a control. We need realistic figures for all age groups, not apply a general figure to toddlers...

The next big flaw in most comparitive diagnostic studies is that people actually get gluten-free diets when they say they do. Unfortunately we know this is often not the case.

For a control we ned a set of volunteers who are given only food tested to be 100% gluten-free. Supposing we had the resources we would rent a huge house and gut the kitchens .. make them 100% gluten-free and carry out the tests here. The house would need to be in a area NOT growing wheat...

No food would be allowed in that was not TESTED... (and I mean tested ... full whack GC-MS so the house needs its own lab, sterile of gluten)...

Everyone in the study, controls and not would be fed 100% tested food... we would be tested daily for blood counts .. and the fluctuations mapped.

A second house would house the "eating gluten group". Everyone here would be the "normal test" and also get blood tests daily... anyone who then tests positive would be moved to the gluten-free house and removed from the control group.

JennyC Enthusiast
JennyC
Posted

It frustrates me when people, including doctors, act like the only way to get diagnosed is to have a positive biopsy. More and more it's becoming widely accepted that positive Ttg tests, along with the celiac panel, and positive dietary response are acceptable means of diagnosis. In theory positive Ttg can be associated with other autoimmune disorders, for example some forms of liver failure or autoimmune diabetes, but if you also have the celiac symptoms and they improve on the diet and after time and your Ttg drops, that seems like excellent proof of celiac disease. Sometimes I feel like some people think I sidestepped diagnosis for my son because I did not have him biopsied, but I feel 100% confident in my decision. Can the people who have positive blood work and negative biopsies who go back on gluten say the same?

Jestgar Rising Star
Jestgar
Posted
Scientifically you can't have a perfect test.... you need to have one that has either flase negatives or false positives but screen everyone at school and awareness sky rockets. We need more accurate controls on blood tests, most studies have to presume that celiac disease is so rare in the general population that serology for the general population is used as a control. We need realistic figures for all age groups, not apply a general figure to toddlers...

I have a theoretical test. It would be pricey, if it works at all, but it would be fairly accurate. Unfortunately, it would be difficult to get the money to test it. The medical community accepts only biopsy proven Celiac disease, and I just don't happen to believe that a destroyed intestine is the definition of the disease; it's just one of the symptoms.

Dunno. I've actually been thinking about this for a while. Maybe I'll see if I can get my boss to foot the bill for a few trials (on myself - no biopsy) to see if it would even work.

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted
The medical community accepts only biopsy proven Celiac disease, and I just don't happen to believe that a destroyed intestine is the definition of the disease; it's just one of the symptoms.

I've never heard it put exactly this way before, but yes--that is a perfect explanation. Perhaps, the villi damage is mearly a symptom, and one that some get later rather than sooner.

I hope you get to do your testing, Jess--I would be most interested in hearing about it.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Fiddle-Faddle
Posted

Like many things in the medical community, it comes down to $$$$.

The doctors don't earn a penny if you change your diet and your symptoms go away. Neither does the pharmaceutical industry.

But the doctors, pharm industry, and hospitals/surgical centers all get quite rich just from your endoscopy. The doctors and the pharm industry get even richer when you have to buy meds that supposedly "treat" your symptoms while you continue to eat gluten, thereby causing more and more damage.

The insurance industry, of course, supports this 1005, as they are also funded in part by the pharm industry.

The whole thing is shockingly unethical.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to ThomasA55's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

      These articles may be helpful:
    2. Jmartes71
      - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Dermatitis Herpetiformis
      5

      Skin issues

      I went to ER on the 30th because I didn't want to wait and saw dr at desk for intake. I went for NOTHING!. ER Dr was very nice but made it seem as if I was a nut case rater than coming in for real issues calmly explaining its staph! Staph, by look no blood test, no skin test. No looking in my nose and throat was given a prescription for jock cream and some...
    3. N Young
      - N Young posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      Frustrated with Providers

      I have been Gluten Free for 25 years and havent eaten gluten knowingly during that time. Such a rocky life, I have had issues since I was 16 when physicians stated I needed to see a psychiatrist. I am now 70 years old. I also had Dermatitis herpetiformis. I had negative tests on biopsy, blood test etc but no doctor mentioned that I needed to do a gluten...
    4. trents
      - trents replied to ThomasA55's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

      "Risk free genetically"? Very low risk, actually. But, we are still learning about the genetics of celiac disease. Speaking of milk, some studies show that CMP (Cow's Milk Protein) can damage the small bowel villi like celiac disease does. Also, some meds (NSAIDS, Olmesartan - a blood pressure med) and some infections can also blunt SB villi.
    5. trents
      - trents replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Test interpretations

      @Aretaeus Cappadocia! The post you were looking for about omeprazol acting as an anti-inflammatory/immunosuppressant was made (yesterday, I believe) by knitty kitty. Current guidelines for the gluten challenge prior to an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel is the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat flour...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,116
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442
    DiDi53
    Newest Member
    DiDi53
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Iron loss and potential celiac.

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      These articles may be helpful:    
    • Jmartes71
      Skin issues

      By Jmartes71 · Posted

      I went to ER on the 30th because I didn't want to wait and saw dr at desk for intake. I went for NOTHING!. ER Dr was very nice but made it seem as if I was a nut case rater than coming in for real issues calmly explaining its staph! Staph,  by look no blood test, no skin test. No looking in my nose and throat was given a prescription for jock cream and some pills ! I made the mistake of saying Im waiting on Infectious disease. She asked how did I get referral and I said I did it online.The next day I checked the status and it was denied! I did get  a referral to the dermatology office i went to last year that over charged me and did a biopsy on me stating inconclusive! I went to another dermatologist and he stated I should see Infectious disease at place i put in referral. With that I contacted that dermatologist and waiting to see if he thinks dermatology or Infectious disease is the route.I do have appointment for dermatology next week.Until then i did purchase Zahler paraGuard advance intestinal  flora support  from Sprouts. Im also very alarmed that the fact celiac isn't addressed properly infact its downplayed. When I had my son tested for HLA-DQ2 and it came out positive because he is eating everything and he is extremely skinny but he isn't dealing with severe diagestive issues because thats all he knows NOW or yet because he is still young 21.I too didn't know any difference when i was that age because thats all we know.Life changes will get him in latter years im afraid because what im dealing with.That scares me.The specialist we went to was only about congestion he is getting.He is getting congestion because he is eating what he isn't supposed too! Zero talk about celiac and HLA-DQ2 positive. Only talk was he is congested because we live in the Valley! They wanted to do surgery! I did write again to our district leader considering when I did call, the guy stated he knew all about celiac. I really wanted to tell him NO YOU DON'T but held my tongue. For my skin sores the cream given didn't do anything because ive also had in past.Ive been putting liquid vitamin c on it and taking vitamins which is making a little difference just with the last few days of doing.
    • N Young
      Frustrated with Providers

      By N Young · Posted

      I have been Gluten Free for 25 years and havent eaten gluten knowingly during that time.   Such a rocky life, I have had issues since I was 16 when physicians stated I needed to see a psychiatrist. I am now 70 years old. I also had Dermatitis herpetiformis. I had negative tests on biopsy, blood test etc but no doctor mentioned that I needed to do a gluten challenge. I went on an elimination diet and found relief on the Dermatitis within a month. I have no doubt that I am celiac and very sensitive now. Now my issue is that I changed physicians due to retirement and he performed a blood test and included a celiac test. I was very upset because I did not request the test and had not been eating gluten for 25 years. Of course the test was negative.  My question - Will this cause me any issues with health treatment if my records now have that I dont have celiac? I like this physician and I am appalled that he performed the test. (he told me his brother is also celiac).  I feel that we are still living in the dark ages. I dont want to cause problems because I rarely need health treatment since I live a fairly healthy lifestyle.  Since I am at this age and been through so much getting to this point am I being unreasonable for being upset? I am not expecting to see this physician for another 2 months.  Need to know if I can expect issues with future treatments. How can a physician not know about the gluten challenge this day and age?   
    • trents
      Iron loss and potential celiac.

      By trents · Posted

      "Risk free genetically"? Very low risk, actually. But, we are still learning about the genetics of celiac disease. Speaking of milk, some studies show that CMP (Cow's Milk Protein) can damage the small bowel villi like celiac disease does. Also, some meds (NSAIDS, Olmesartan - a blood pressure med) and some infections can also blunt SB villi.
    • trents
      Test interpretations

      By trents · Posted

      @Aretaeus Cappadocia! The post you were looking for about omeprazol acting as an anti-inflammatory/immunosuppressant was made (yesterday, I believe) by knitty kitty. Current guidelines for the gluten challenge prior to an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel is the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat flour bread) for at least two weeks prior to the day of the procedure. @Ginarwebb, your tTG-IGA >250 would seem to be a pretty high test result, though to be sure of that statement, I would need to see what the lab used for a "normal" range. Do you have that number also? Different labs use different scales. There isn't an industry standard yet. The tTG-IGA is the centerpiece of celiac blood antibody testing. Your ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODY SCR (IGA) W/REFL TO TITER (aka, "EMA") is positive as well. This is an older test, and a relative expensive one, compared to the tTG-IGA which has largely replaced. But the EMA is still ordered by some docs and is highly reliable. That both of them agree in your case and this is strong evidence that you have celiac disease. Concerning the ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODY TITER (aka, "total IGA") being high, there are two things of importance. First, it tells us you are not "IGA deficient" such that your tTG-IGA test result is reliable. Second, a high total IGA test score can suggest other health concerns, some of which are serious. It can also mean nothing. Talk to your doctor about this. I would also suggest you research the implications of a high total IGA. In addition to IGA celiac diagnostic tests there are also IGG tests which are handy when total IGA is sub normal.  Here is an article outlining the various tests that can be run for diagnosing celiac disease:  
×
×
  • Create New...