Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gi Pathology Report


artselegance

Recommended Posts

artselegance Apprentice

Opinoins Wanted:

1. Duodenum: Usual villous architecture with mildly increased intraepithelial T lymphocytes.

2. Gastric Body: Minimal chronic gastritis. No Helicobacter identified.

Microscopic Description:

1. Duodenum: The duodenal mucosa shows the usual villous architecture without effacement or blunting. No significant chronic inflammatory reaction is identified. There is a marked increase in the number of lymphocytes within the epithelium. While this change in nonspecific and has been associated with Helicobacter gastritis and other pathologic entities, it should raise the clinical suspicion for sprue in the appropriate clinical setting.

2. Gastric Antrum: The gastric mucosa contains infrequent small clusters of lymphocytes and plasma cells. No acute inflammation is present.. Negative for internal metaplasia. These changes are mild, nonspecific and insufficient for a diagnosis of gastritis.

I am waiting on the blood work, should be another 5-7 days according to nurse. Just tell me if you know what this means.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ShayFL Enthusiast

Looks like mild intestinal irritation. If your blood labs come back POS. A gluten free diet is the answer, no matter what the doctors say.

The PROOF is in the diet. You will know once you are on the diet long enough if it is the culprit.

nora-n Rookie

If you read and go back in time in thefooddoc.com 's blog, he would say this is significant, they are even discussing lowering the amount of IEL for diagnosing celiac, from 30 per 100 to 20 per 100. You had a significant amount.

Increased IEL is even on the MARSH scale, it is 1 or 2 or something.

If you google marsh and celiac you might fid the scale.

nora

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Opinoins Wanted:

1. Duodenum: Usual villous architecture with mildly increased intraepithelial T lymphocytes.

2. Gastric Body: Minimal chronic gastritis. No Helicobacter identified.

Microscopic Description:

1. Duodenum: The duodenal mucosa shows the usual villous architecture without effacement or blunting. No significant chronic inflammatory reaction is identified. There is a marked increase in the number of lymphocytes within the epithelium. While this change in nonspecific and has been associated with Helicobacter gastritis and other pathologic entities, it should raise the clinical suspicion for sprue in the appropriate clinical setting.

2. Gastric Antrum: The gastric mucosa contains infrequent small clusters of lymphocytes and plasma cells. No acute inflammation is present.. Negative for internal metaplasia. These changes are mild, nonspecific and insufficient for a diagnosis of gastritis.

I am waiting on the blood work, should be another 5-7 days according to nurse. Just tell me if you know what this means.

What this is saying is that if you also have symptoms suggestive of celiac sprue that would be considered to be the diagnosis. The inflammation is also suggestive of celiac as is the increase in the T cells. You should give the diet a really strict go even if the blood work is negative. It looks like you got lucky and things were caught before you got to the end stages, full villi destruction. It is better if you don't get to that point so if the doctor tells you that he thinks it 'might be celiac but how about you keep eating gluten for another year and then we will recheck you and by the way here is a handful of pills for the symptoms your having' you might want to go gluten free and then get checked again if the problems don't resolve.

happygirl Collaborator

How many biopsy samples were taken (it should say that in the pathology report)?

artselegance Apprentice
How many biopsy samples were taken (it should say that in the pathology report)?

Three biospy samples were taken...

And I have been gluten-free since Monday after my blood was drawn...or very close anyway, just really noting everything that goes into my mouth and how it makes me feel. I did have some Churn Style Country Crock margarine on rice on Tuesday night and felt like that really didn't set well with me.

Also, I want to know about water.....since I am B12 deficient and there is a malabsorption problem, I think water sometimes just bloats me and is not absorbing.... would this make any sense?

Some positive things since Monday are I have not once taken a nap this week after work, more energy noted, mood seems to be lots calmer, went to bathroom this morning for what I felt was kinda normal....

Thanks for all your responses....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    2. - barb simkin replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    3. - trents replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    4. - barb simkin replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,332
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Roxy79
    Newest Member
    Roxy79
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      So, you had both and endoscopy with biopsy and a colonoscopy. That helps me understand what you were trying to communicate. No, no! It never occurred to me that you were trying to mislead me. It's just that we get a lot of posters on the forum who are misinformed about what celiac disease is and how it is diagnosed so I need some clarification from you which you were so gracious to give.
    • barb simkin
      I had both the genetic genes for celiac.  My gastroenologist advised he also took a biopsy during one of my colonoscopies and endoscopy and advised I had celiac disease, along with stomach ulcers from my esophagus stomach down to my small bowel. I was shown the ulcers on the catscan and endoscopy report.  I also had polyps in 3 places throughout my large bowel. I was on a strict diet for months following.  I am sorry if I didnt define how I was diagnosed with celiac disease.  I am sorry if you think I was misleading you. I also had to pay $150.00 for the genetic testing.
    • trents
      So, I'm a little confused here. I understand you to say that you have not been officially diagnosed with celiac disease. Is this correct?  You have had genetic testing done to check for the potential for developing celiac disease and that was positive. Is this correct? I think you meant to type "gluten sensitivity" but you typed "gluten insensitivity". Just so we are clear about the terminology, there is celiac disease and there is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). They are not the same but they have overlapping symptoms. Celiac disease causes damage to the small bowel lining but NCGS does not. NCGS is often referred to in short form as gluten sensitivity. However, people often use the terms celiac disease and gluten sensitivity interchangeably so it can be unclear which disease they are referring to. Genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population has one or both of  the genes that have been most strongly connected with the potential to develop active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develops active celiac disease. This makes the genetic test useful for ruling out celiac disease but not for diagnosing it. A colonoscopy cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease because it doesn't permit the scope to go up into the small bowel where celiac disease does the damage. They use an endoscopy ("upper GI) for checking the small bowel lining for celiac damage.
    • barb simkin
      I did nor read the chocolate pkg as it was of fered to me and I ate 2 pcs. I do know that only very dark chocolate and and a very few others are gluten free. Most alcohols contain gluten. I have several yrs of not knowing my celiac condition as docs would not do the test. After looking on the internet about my sufferings I insisted on the gene trsting which showed positive for gluten insensitivity and a biopsy on my next colonoscopy that also showed positive which could not help the damage done to my small bowel. So I very rarely have a glass of wine
    • trents
      @barb simkin, are you sure the chocolate products are gluten-free and not "manufactured on equipment that also handles wheat products and tree nuts", i.e., cross-contamination? And what kind of alcoholic beverages are we talking about? Most beers are made from gluten-containing grains. Just checking.
×
×
  • Create New...