Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is It Celiac?


beachbel

Recommended Posts

beachbel Apprentice

Hi. I'm looking for suggestions on my son's situation. He is seven years old and had a low positive blood test for celiac disease ( His Ab, IgA was 20 with a range of over 19 positive). I should mention that is IGA was low (50 with reference range of 51-259 normal) which the dr said can cause the Ab, IgA to be a false low too. So we had a endoscope biopsy done. I just got the biopsy results yesterday. The biopsy found he is lactose intolerant and it also found inflammation but the dr said it isnt inflammation that is typical of celiac disease. So the dr gave us two options. First, I can put him on a lactose free diet and then if that doesn't clear up his symptoms, put him on a celiac diet. Or the second option is to put him on a lactose free diet and then have him re-tested in a couple of years for celiac disease while monitoring his symptoms and growth carefully. His symptoms are constipation, foul smelling bowel movements, and he prefers to avoid gluten and milk products ( we did make sure he had plenty of gluten for the 6 weeks prior to his biopsy).

I should mention that I have celiac disease and have a 14 year old son on the celiac diet. My 14 year old had a higher positive blood test and more symptoms, including stunted growth; his biopsy was completely negative. Even though his biopsy was negative, the dr had us put him on the celiac diet because of the severity of his symptoms and he is responding well to the diet. The dr is still checking him for other conditions since his biopsy was negative.

So, does anyone have any suggestions? It seems my boys have fallen into the "gray" area of diagnosis and I want to make the right decision. Thank you in advance.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lizard00 Enthusiast

I have very low IgA, too, and it does greatly affect the test results. If your son falls below the range, and still tests positive, that would be a pretty big indicator to me. If it actually shows up on the test, even though in the low range, it may be really high for him.

And with 22ft of small intestine, it's possible that they just missed a spot that fit their criteria for damage.

Looks like celiac to me. :)

leadmeastray88 Contributor

I have to agree with Lizard00.

It does really sound like Celiac since his blood was positive, and it's not a "low positive" if he's IgA deficient which he clearly is... so in reality his IgA levels are probably extremely high.

I would take the bloodwork as enough evidence because some Celiacs will never have a positive biopsy no matter how much gluten they eat. You don't want to poison him any more. Maybe your doctor will give him a positive dx based on bloodwork alone. You should consider also that many Celiacs also have intolerances to other foods, dairy being one of the more common. It's possible that 'inflammation' is being caused by both gluten and dairy.

Good luck!

beachbel Apprentice

Thanks for the feedback. We are definitely leaning towards putting my son on the gluten free diet. I guess it won't hurt whereas if I leave him on gluten it could cause damage. He prefers gluten free food anyhow.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    3. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    5. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,084
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    bigwave
    Newest Member
    bigwave
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • AlwaysLearning
      Get tested for vitamin deficiencies.  Though neuropathy can be a symptom of celiac, it can also be caused by deficiencies due to poor digestion caused by celiac and could be easier to treat.
    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.