Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can Anyone Please Help Me Interpret These Celiac Panel Results?


ConfusedNeuropathic

Recommended Posts

ConfusedNeuropathic Rookie

Hi all,

I was wondering if anyone would be kind enough to help me interpet my recent celiac panel results. I'd normally wait to talk with my doctor, but Ive been having polyneuropathy and dizziness with some minor GI discomfort for a while now and am eager for any information possible. Any feedback at all would be very much appreciated. Here are the results:

tTG Ab,IgA

MY VALUE: <3

UNITS: U/mL

REFERENCE RANGE:

NEGATIVE: <5

EQUIVOCAL: 5-8

POSITIVE: >8

IgA

MY VALUE: 138

UNITS: mg/dL

REFERENCE RANGE: 81 to 463

Gliadin Ab IgA

MY VALUE: <3

UNITS: U/mL

REFERENCE RANGE:

NEGATIVE: <11

EQUIVOCAL: 11-17

POSITIVE: >17

Am I right that these results strongly suggest I do not have celiac disease?

Thanks A LOT for any assistance, it is highly appreciated!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ConfusedNeuropathic Rookie

Ok I did a little searching around and now understand that this apparently isn't a full celiac panel since it only tests for IgA antibodies, for which I'm in the lowish range to begin with.

Is there anything at all that can be concluded -- or is at least strongly suggested -- one way or the other based on these results?

Also, is it possible for dermatitis herpetiformis to manifest without a rash?

I'm desparately searching for the cause of polyneuropathy and widespread rashless itching. So many possibilities, both terrible and benign, have been ruled out already and was really hoping I had an answer with celiac sprue / dermatitis herpetiformis, but it seems that I've struck out yet again. Do you all agree?

Thanks for any input at all.

gfb1 Rookie
Ok I did a little searching around and now understand that this apparently isn't a full celiac panel since it only tests for IgA antibodies, for which I'm in the lowish range to begin with.

Is there anything at all that can be concluded -- or is at least strongly suggested -- one way or the other based on these results?

Also, is it possible for dermatitis herpetiformis to manifest without a rash?

I'm desparately searching for the cause of polyneuropathy and widespread rashless itching. So many possibilities, both terrible and benign, have been ruled out already and was really hoping I had an answer with celiac sprue / dermatitis herpetiformis, but it seems that I've struck out yet again. Do you all agree?

Thanks for any input at all.

your tests indicate that you PROBABLY don't have celiac disease. that word 'probably' is the stickler. there are plenty of folks in the forums (and probably one of the big reasons that they are here) that were told they PROBABLY didn't have celiac disease... yet they did.

if you, or your doctor, have reason to believe that you are having reactions of any sort to gluten in your diet; you should be tested for the IgG- EMA/TTG tests. i don't have the links handy ... but, they are poking around the forum... there's a good reference at columbia.u's site and another that i posted elsewhere.

now for my usual digression... :)

the ranges of values in blood tests are based on a confidence interval. depending on the lab and/or test being conducted, each combination has a precise confidence interval (usually, but not always, 95%), meaning if your test value falls WITHIN that range, there is approx. 95% chance that your value is not significantly different from the average. probably because of how our brains are wired, we all look at a value of serum IgA of 140 and think, its on the low side of the reference range (80-450). statistically, in this example there is no difference among values of 85, 150, 265, or 440 -- with regard to a comparison to the standardized average of the test.

this is part of what makes diagnosis so difficult, and a real art -- not just a science.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,128
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Susie1967
    Newest Member
    Susie1967
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • NoriTori
      @Scott Adams No one said anything about eating gluten consistently until testing, the appointment was scheduled and an address was given. I don't even have access to the results as it stands. I was just told "everything looks fine, but slight irritation." I don't know if they took a biopsy because I have no access to the results. I don't know how many samples they took (I recently learned they're supposed to take more than one), I don't know what things looked like internally, it was just word of mouth and I didn't know any better to pry and get copies of everything. And I know! I also have chronic Anemia, never truly resolved UNTIL I went gluten free, and low vitamin D (fairly normal in black community), and low creatine (also resolved with gluten free diet). I plan to request a new dermatologist! As well as a referral to Gastro. Food/symptom diary is a great idea though. I have no way of cooking as it stands, so even just the basics wouldn't work for me.
    • trents
      @NoriTori, "gluten intolerance" is a general term that can refer to either celiac disease or NCGS. NCGS is often referred to as "gluten sensitivity" for short. Though, admittedly, there is still a great deal of inconsistency in the use of terms by the general public.
    • NoriTori
      @trents A gluten intolerance is a real possibility! I never ruled it out, but am keen on finding out the EXACT cause. I'd want testing done again to be sure it's not celiac, or SIBO (which I've considered) or other digestive disorder. Celiac seems the most pertinent considering its implications.
    • sillyac58
      Thanks so much Scott. I would be incredibly grateful to the gluten gods if eliminating oats was the magic cure. In the meantime, it's nice to have moral support! 
    • trents
      Understood. And don't beat yourself up about this. Many are in the same boat as you, having experimented with the gluten-free diet before getting formerly tested. It is a logical, common sense approach when you don't have the knowledge about how testing works or you don't have the healthcare resources to afford testing. And some experience such severe reactions to gluten that it is impossible to get through the gluten challenge in order to get tested. So, they must live with the ambiguity of not knowing for sure if they suffer from celiac disease or NCGS. But at the end of the day, the antidote is the same for both. Namely, life-ling abstinence from gluten. Recently there was an article on posted on this forum about the develop of a new testing method for diagnosing celiac disease that do not require a gluten challenge. It is still in the developmental stage and probably years away from becoming main streams even if it pans out. But there is hope at least.
×
×
  • Create New...