Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Dgp/iga Results Positive

patz

Recommended Posts

patz Newbie
patz
Posted

Hi all, I just recvd panel back. All neg except the new GDP IGA came back 38. GDP IGG was neg. Doc wants me to see GI. With only one positive test but supposedly quite accurate can I assume celiac disease? I have bloating, gas, nausea and sometimes just don't feel well.

Mainly need to know if worth getting scoped on only one positive test. Help!!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Wolicki Enthusiast
Wolicki
Posted

This is actually the first I have heard of this test. After reading this study:

Open Original Shared Link

I think that a biopsy is wise. It appears to be a very reliable indicator. Good luck!

  • 1 year later...
gfcolorado Newbie
gfcolorado
Posted

Hi all, I just recvd panel back. All neg except the new GDP IGA came back 38. GDP IGG was neg. Doc wants me to see GI. With only one positive test but supposedly quite accurate can I assume celiac disease? I have bloating, gas, nausea and sometimes just don't feel well.

Mainly need to know if worth getting scoped on only one positive test. Help!!

I just came across your post and realize it's been awhile so I'm not sure if you'll get this. I just had a positive only GDP biopsy and was wondering what your biopsy came back. Thanks!

Emsstacey Rookie
Emsstacey
Posted

gfcolorado, are you saying that only your deamidated gliadin was positive and your biopsy was positive, too?

I ask because my only antibody that came back positive was the deamidated gliadin at a 31. I did not get the scope because I had one done about 10 years ago looking for the same thing. I never did get the results, though, just told it was ok. I'm actually going to go pick them up this week to see for myself what they say.

Just curious! Thanks!

melissa222 Newbie
melissa222
Posted

I just got my results back I had deamidated gliadin antibodies at 36, along with a DQ8 gene (I got the genetic test at the same time). Other tests were negative. I have major celiac symptoms. I'm having the scope done next week. My GI Dr, who was recommended to me by a local celiac support group, said this test was a very strong indication that I do have celiac. From what I've read this test is very specific to celiac, and a valuable new test in detecting celiac in patients, like me, who have tested negative with the other tests.

Emsstacey Rookie
Emsstacey
Posted

Wow. It sounds like a lot more people with only the positive DGP. I guess that I need to go retest and find a GI. I would be very grateful if you update after your scope!

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

DGP is considerably more sensitive than the other tests in the celiac panel.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


melissa222 Newbie
melissa222
Posted

My biopsy came back normal. Dr says it is not celiac but to try gluten free diet. I'm bummed because I thought I had hope to feel better.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

My biopsy came back normal. Dr says it is not celiac but to try gluten free diet. I'm bummed because I thought I had hope to feel better.

Don't be bummed get on the diet. If your DGP was positive you do need to avoid all gluten. False negative biopsies are very common. Get on the diet strictly and you should be feeling better soon.

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

My biopsy came back normal. Dr says it is not celiac but to try gluten free diet. I'm bummed because I thought I had hope to feel better.

You do have hope to feel better. My mom came back negative on antibodies and biopsy. She feels a heck of a lot better off gluten. With the DGP there is certainly something going on and you might be pleasantly surprised.

pain*in*my*gut Apprentice
pain*in*my*gut
Posted

My biopsy came back normal. Dr says it is not celiac but to try gluten free diet. I'm bummed because I thought I had hope to feel better.

My biopsy was normal, too. My GI doc dismissed me without any follow up to discuss my obvious Celiac symptoms. According to him (and a lot of docs), if the biopsy was negative, I don't have a problem. What an idiot. :angry:

When my rheumatologist took one look at my DGP levels, he said it was most certainly Celiac and to avoid gluten like the plague. :o DGP is very specific for Celiac, so in his opinion, it trumps the biopsy because of the false negative probability if the damage is patchy in the intestines.

I am now one month gluten free, and my stomach issues are 80% better than before! I think you will be pleasanly suprised by how good you will feel off of gluten! B)

gfcolorado Newbie
gfcolorado
Posted

gfcolorado, are you saying that only your deamidated gliadin was positive and your biopsy was positive, too?

I ask because my only antibody that came back positive was the deamidated gliadin at a 31. I did not get the scope because I had one done about 10 years ago looking for the same thing. I never did get the results, though, just told it was ok. I'm actually going to go pick them up this week to see for myself what they say.

Just curious! Thanks!

When I was originally tested 3 years ago, all my tests (TTG, EMA, DGP) were positive and so was my biopsy. This time, only my DGP was positive. My TTG and EMA were negative. I think I'm going to get another endoscopy just to see what's going on. If I do, I'll let you know.

gfcolorado Newbie
gfcolorado
Posted

My biopsy was normal, too. My GI doc dismissed me without any follow up to discuss my obvious Celiac symptoms. According to him (and a lot of docs), if the biopsy was negative, I don't have a problem. What an idiot. :angry:

When my rheumatologist took one look at my DGP levels, he said it was most certainly Celiac and to avoid gluten like the plague. :o DGP is very specific for Celiac, so in his opinion, it trumps the biopsy because of the false negative probability if the damage is patchy in the intestines.

I am now one month gluten free, and my stomach issues are 80% better than before! I think you will be pleasanly suprised by how good you will feel off of gluten! B)

I think there is so much they still don't know about Celiac and Gluten Sensitivity and the DGP test. When I went to a Celiac conference about 3 years ago, they hardly talked about Gluten sensitivity. When I went last year, the top Celiac researchers all talked about it. Most doctors say that you don't have Celiac until your biopsy is positive and no one really knows at what point you become positive. I had really bad stomach aches my whole life but wasn't diagnosed with Celiac until I was 43. My biopsy was positive and my stomach aches are gone but would I have tested positive when I was a kid or 10 years prior? I don't know but going off of gluten would have made my stomach aches go away and might have prevented villous atrophy and other auto immune diseases.

Thanks everyone for sharing your info!

  • 2 weeks later...
melissa222 Newbie
melissa222
Posted

Yall were right! After about 11 days gluten free my energy levels picked up and I have felt incredible...more energy, anxiety is gone, more focus...I have not felt this good in years. Now I'm going to patiently wait for my physical problems to improve! It's almost miraculous. To think had I not figured this out on my own, I would've lived out the rest of my life completely miserable. Doctors are grossly mis/uneducated about this!! All the time n money spent on Dr visits and tests, when the whole time it was food. :/ I consider myself lucky. So many suffer so much longer and never know how poisonous gluten can be. It should come with a warning label!

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

That's wonderful news! I'm so glad to hear you're feeling better. Thanks a lot for coming back to update us and share your good news!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By Judy M · Posted

      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten free beer ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.