Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Milk Is An Unhealthy Drink!


irish daveyboy

Recommended Posts

irish daveyboy Community Regular

Don't condemn it out of hand, read it first then come back and criticise it. (If you wish)

Western populations consume gallons of milk as a primary source for calcium, vitamin D and other essential minerals vital for building healthy bones and thus might be expected to decrease the risk of hip fracture and/or osteoporosis, and yet the more milk and dairy products they consume the higher the occurrence of obesity, osteoporosis, cancer, acne, heart disease, constipation, diabetes and irritable bowel syndrome among them.

We all have grown to believe that consuming dairy foods can increase our body absorption of both calcium and vitamin D, but many of us are unaware that milk is the most polluted and unhealthy drink that has left us with many negative health effects.

Some of the controversial headings in this article.

Obesity is Linked to Consumption of Cows Milk and Other Dairy Products

The Calcium in Cows Milk Cant be Used by Human Body

High Protein in Cows Milk Accelerates Bone Loss

Cows Milk is Completely Devoid of Nutritional Value

Dairy Products are Loaded with Substantial Amount of Fat and Cholesterol

Cows Milk is for Baby Cows, Not Humans

Cows Milk Adds in Additional Hormone in Humans for Abnormal Growth

Dairy Foods Contributes to Global Warming

Over 60% World Populations are Lactose-intolerant

The Health Hazard of recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH) in Dairy Foods

Plus lot's more.

Open Original Shared Link

Best Regards,

David


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



JNBunnie1 Community Regular

I have two problems with this article. The first and foremost being, they do not discuss the correlation between the rise of disease associated with milk consumption, and the pasteurization of milk and milk products. I'd suggest a bit of study on the pros and cons of pasteurization.

My second problem is that the article reads like it was composed in another language and then translated by Babelfish. I use this closing statement as my example: "The objective of writing this article is clear here that I

runningcrazy Contributor

Dairy cows are pumped full of hormones. These make them produce way more milk than they naturally are meant to. This makes their utters swell. This makes them a lot larger, and the drag around the ground all day. (Think dragging your hands behind you on the ground all day) Obviously, they get cut up. Since the cows basically live in their own waste, the cuts get infected with it. The infections cause pus. According to the FDA something like 1 cubic inch(or something like that) is allowed per gallon of milk. Thats disgusting, in my opinion. But I do think organic milk is different. Still, milk is supposed to leach calcium from your bones. I personally think brocolli, sesame seeds, etc are better sources of calcium.

runningcrazy Contributor

I also agree with the milk being made for baby cows, not humans. Humans are the only species who drinks the milk of another species. Milk in any animal is meant for infants.

jackay Enthusiast

My doctor is definitely against milk. He isn't against organic kefir or yogurt, though, because of all the good probiotics in it.

  • 5 months later...
farmgirl12 Newbie

Are you people crazy? Cows are pumped full of hormones??? Do you have any clue or idea what goes into raising any kind of agricultural crops--dairy included?? There are strick guidelines, as well as manditory testing through the national dairy Herd Improvement Assoication--that is-obviously-nationwide. It is amazing to me how many people will go on something they read or heard--not even trying to invstigate or research--reputable sources--for themselves.

Agrivating!

mushroom Proficient

What is aggravating to me is that here in New Zealand we have a supposedly grass-raised dairy herd population and we thrive on our 'clean green' image. So where does that take us? It takes us to cows that are fed maize silage and it takes us to cows that are barn raised for a good part of the year and are fed palm husks thereby contributing to the depletion of the rain forests. Of course they claim that this is just leftover product and would be thrown away otherwise, but how much does this demand drive the cutting down of the rain forests for replacement with palms. We have cows that are fed BGH, we have cows that are essentially aborted of their calves so they will come into milk at the same time as all the other cows (the calves die of course). And this is in a country that is supposedly a model of good dairy practice. And all the while they degrade our streams and rivers, their effluent contaminates our wells, and when they die after eating their maize silage they are turned into hamburger meat. No wonder I don't eat burgers.

And this is over and beyond the pasteurization problem - I was raised on a farm and stopped drinking milk when it didn't come from a cow I milked. because I couldn't stand the taste and it gave me a stomach ache. I do however eat yogurt and cheese :(


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    3. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,473
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kelly Hannon
    Newest Member
    Kelly Hannon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.