Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can Milk Contain Gluten?


Marz

Recommended Posts

T.H. Community Regular

You really can't compare cow milk and human milk at all. We have two VERY different digestive systems.

But do we have two very different mammary systems, at least in how they function and what substances can make it through into the milk? (not being snarky...I'm actually kind of curious about this now. )


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

But do we have two very different mammary systems, at least in how they function and what substances can make it through into the milk? (not being snarky...I'm actually kind of curious about this now. )

I don't know about the mammary system, but nothing can get into the body to get into the mammary system without going through the digestive tract first.

Skylark Collaborator

But do we have two very different mammary systems, at least in how they function and what substances can make it through into the milk? (not being snarky...I'm actually kind of curious about this now. )

It IS interesting! Like Tarnalberry says, food has to get absorbed through the digestive system before it makes it to the milk. Cows have four stomachs, one full of bacteria, fungi, and protozoa and special digestive enzymes that break down fiber and other plant matter that is indigestible to humans. They also chew a cud, as you probably know, which helps them break down fiber better. They can even digest cellulose, the fiber in wood. That's how they can live on grass and hay that would leave us sick and starved. Their small intestine is different from ours, and they absorb more fatty acids and less glucose from food. The glucose mostly feeds the bacteria. This is kind of an interesting read. Open Original Shared Link Wikipedia has a more technical article. Open Original Shared Link

It is entirely possible cows and other ruminants could be fully digesting gluten since their digestive enzymes are different, food is digested longer and much more thoroughly, and they have so many gut microbes helping them out.

T.H. Community Regular

:D - I love the fact that you always have such interesting information!

I swear, I have learned more from your links... :)

In that vein...I don't suppose you've ever found a good source on the limitations of the gluten tests?

The information I've heard (can't even remember where anymore!) is that some of the gluten tests have more trouble detecting gluten if it's been fermented, because the test has more accuracy detecting 'pieces' of gluten that have not been broken down to that extent, even though these pieces are still large enough to cause us trouble - soy sauce was mentioned, as I recall. I have never looked into it too much myself to see the specifics of this information, don't even know if it applies to all tests, or just some (I believe the ELISA test is the one I heard it mentioned re:). So if you had any information you've ever found on it, I'd love to hear.

I recall barley testing is still something that needs a bit of tweaking before it's perfected (Open Original Shared Link ), so it doesn't seem like it would be outside the realm of possibility for it to have some trouble too.

The reason I'm curious in this instance with cow's milk is that with your information it seems like maybe there could be issues: with the ruminant breaking down gluten further than humans do...does that make it harder for our tests to detect it? Or at the very least make them less accurate? Or is it not even an issue? (I feel the researching bug take hold now)

If it weren't so gross to think about, I'd love to get the actual contents of a grain fed cow's stomach tested just before the contents leave the stomach, and then have those same contents tested on a willing celiac to see if they react...which, yeah, okay, so obviously I'd make a better evil scientist than a good one, if I'm thinking of subjecting someone to that, LOL.

dilettantesteph Collaborator

I don't think you are alone either. My own sensitivity comes and goes but I'm not to where I react to 1 ppm. I try to eat whole foods I prepare myself for the most part because of those studies on refractory celiac. Besides, it's healthier anyway. I'm really starting to appreciate how bad processed foods are for us.

Awareness has gotten so much better. When I first came here trying to figure out what was wrong, I kept being told that I couldn't possibly be reacting to gluten in gluten free foods. It was pretty frustrating.

I agree with you that if cows are eating 100% wheat, there should be detectable gluten in there even in the 1-3 ppm range, if gluten can get into the milk that way. That leads me to question something. I don't have access to the full paper. Maybe you can tell me. This worried me a little:

"no gluten proteins or gluten fragments could be detected above background in any of the bovine milk samples, whereas gluten was easily detected in spiked samples"

I used to work in an analytical company looking for trace contaminants. We were told that if we couldn't detect the target compound above the background that it wasn't there. I changed the procedure in one case so that the background could be separated better from the target compound and found that many of the samples which had been found to be negative for the target compound were actually positive. I wonder a bit about that in this paper. I wonder what the apparent concentration was in the spiked samples, and whether they contained the same amount of background noise. Is there anything in the paper which would answer my questions?

Skylark Collaborator

They spiked to 1 ug/mL. I'm sleepy, but isn't that about 1 ppm?

For this purpose, two late-lactation Holstein cows (Bos taurus) were initially fed a corn-containing diet. The corn portion of the diet was slowly changed to wheat, from 0% to 25%, 50%, 75%, 82.5%, and 100% wheat. Each experimental diet was fed ad libitum for 3 d before milk sample collection. The milk was divided into two identical sets of aliquots of 40 mL. One set of samples was analyzed for the presence of gluten and gluten-derived peptides by commercially available gluten detection kits based on the R5 monoclonal antibody [5]. The second set of milk samples was analyzed for the presence of gluten proteins and peptides known to contain T-cell–stimulatory epitopes of gluten involved in the induction of celiac disease-related symptoms [1], [6], [7] and [8].

No HMW glutenin-derived peptides could be detected in the various milk samples by the monoclonal antibody–based competition assay (gray bars). However, when spiked with 1 μg/mL of the HMW glutenin standard, all glutenin proteins could be fully recovered (black bars). Similar results were obtained with monoclonal antibodies specific for α- and γ-gliadin peptides (not shown).

Their graph shows good recovery in the spiked samples ranging from from 0.9-1.2 ug/ml, with error bars around 0.1 ug/ml on the assay with the largest error and to my eye maybe 0.02 on the better samples. There is some background in the assay in two of the un-spiked samples and it looks to be between 0 and 0.03 ug/mL on the graph, well within the error bars on the spiked samples if that helps. It looks to me like they could have easily seen 0.5, probably 0.1, but 0.02 would be in the noise.

Here are references 6, 7, and 8 that describe the T-cell stimulatory epitope methods.

[6] E.H. Spaenij-Dekking, E.M. Kooy-Winkelaar, W.F. Nieuwenhuizen, J.W. Drijfhout and F. Koning, A novel and sensitive method for the detection of T cell stimulatory epitopes of alpha/beta- and gamma-gliadin, Gut 53 (2004), pp. 1267–1273.

[7] L. Spaenij-Dekking, E.M. Kooy-Winkelaar, P.A. van Veelen, J.W. Drijfhout, H. Jonker and L. van Soest et al., Natural variation in toxicity of wheat: potential for selection of non-toxic varieties for coeliac disease patients, Gastroenterology 129 (2005), pp. 797–806.

[8] C. Mitea, R. Havenaar, J.W. Drijfhout, L. Edens, L. Dekking and F. Koning, Efficient degradation of gluten by a prolyl endoprotease in a gastrointestinal model: implications for celiac disease, Gut 57 (2008), pp. 25–32.

dilettantesteph Collaborator

Thank you.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,246
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kathleen weber
    Newest Member
    Kathleen weber
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @Zuma888, The antibodies produced in response to gluten are made in the intestines.  When the body is provoked sufficiently, the antibodies overflow out of the intestines and into the blood stream.  Once in the blood stream, the antibodies can be measured with tTg IgA tests.  Three grams of gluten per day for two weeks minimum is enough gluten to make you feel the symptoms of having been glutened, but the antibodies are not in sufficient quantity to be measured in the blood. Ten grams of gluten per day for a minimum of two weeks is required to get the anti gluten antibodies at a high enough level in the blood stream to be measured by tTg IgA tests. So, no, occasional cross contamination or (heaven forbid) intentional cheat days will not be sufficient for tTg IgA testing.  You will still be making antibodies which will still be causing inflammation and damage to the intestines and body.  Histamine is released as part of the immune response to gluten.  High histamine levels lead to food sensitivities, brain fog, and body aches.   The damage done to the gastrointestinal tract affects the absorption of essential vitamins and minerals.  Malabsorption of fats can cause changes in stools.  Insufficient absorption of vitamins and minerals can cause damage to other organs like the thyroid if it can't get enough Selenium, iodine, iron, zinc, and Thiamine.  Brain fog and fatigue can be caused by low Thiamine and other B Complex vitamins.  Vitamin D is needed to regulate the immune system.  One gene is all that's needed to develop Celiac disease.  I know a Celiac diagnosis is a change that can be difficult to get your head around.  Many people go through the five stages of grief.  One stage is "bargaining".  Sounds like you're stuck there.  Every little cheat counts to your detriment.  But sticking to a gluten free diet, makes every meal a success.   Read the comments below the article... Best wishes!  Keep us posted on your progress!
    • Scott Adams
      No, I would not say this at all. If you were diagnosed with celiac disease and were gluten-free for a while, you could have gone into remission. Everyone's body is different, and some celiacs may be able to get regular contamination and not end up with damaged villi and positive antibody tests, while others who ingest tiny amounts will relapse and have full blown symptoms and flattened villi.  Only a full gluten challenge would reveal where you are at this point. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      The most common nutrient deficiencies associated with celiac disease that may lead to testing for the condition include iron, vitamin D, folate (vitamin B9), vitamin B12, calcium, zinc, and magnesium.  Unfortunately many doctors, including my own doctor at the time, don't do extensive follow up testing for a broad range of nutrient deficiencies, nor recommend that those just diagnosed with celiac disease take a broad spectrum vitamin/mineral supplement, which would greatly benefit most, if not all, newly diagnosed celiacs.      
    • Pablohoyasaxa
      Great  post. The skin issue can be intolerable. I have been taking niacinamide for the past month and have improved with respect to the blistering lesions. 
    • knitty kitty
      I've found taking Niacin Vitamin B 3 in the form that causes flushing (nicotinic acid) helps immensely to clear my skin.  The flushing is harmless and goes away the longer Niacin is taken.  The flushing (vasodilation in the skin) helps the body get rid of the tTg 3 IgA antibodies that cause the blisters.  TTg 2 IgA antibodies are found in the blood and are measured in diagnostic testing for Celiac.  People with Dermatitis Herpetiformis make tTg 3 as well as tTg 2 antibodies.  Niacin Vitamin B3 in the non flushing form niacinamide also works without the flushing, but takes a bit longer.   I also avoid foods containing high levels of iodine because iodine activates the tTg 3 IgA antibodies to become more active and make more blisters.  I avoid kelp (nori, seaweed) and crustaceans,  eggs, dairy products, and iodized table salt.   Niacinamide and Nicotinic acid are water soluble and harmless.  I'd much rather take Niacin than Dapsone with scary side effects.  
×
×
  • Create New...