Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy Report


RVluvin

Recommended Posts

RVluvin Apprentice

Went to the follow up visit today since my biopsy was done. Maybe an advanced member will understand it more than what I can make from it:

Diagnosis: Features suggestive of celiac disease, Marsh Type IIIB.

Microscopic description: The sections through the duodenal biopsy show fragments of ducdenal mucosa with marked villous atrophy. There is crypt hyperplasia and an intraepitheial lymphocytosis that measures greater then 40 intraepithelial lymphocytes per 100 enterocytes. The lamina propria contains an increase in the number of mononuclear cells, particularly lymphocytes and plasma cells. There is no evidence of neoplasia associated with these changes. There is no evidence of peptic duodenitis or microorganisms.

Doctor wants to do an other biopsy in 6 months. I'm not so sure I'll go along with that. What do you think?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Booghead Contributor

The sections through the duodenal biopsy show fragments of ducdenal mucosa with marked villous atrophy. I believe this means you have blunting of the villi. Congrats sounds like you have Celiacs! Go off gluten. I think the second biopsy is to prove that your celiacs has started to heal. I read bout how they used to diagnose celiacs: positive biopsy on gluten, negative biospy off gluten(6 months later), reintroduce gluten and have another positive biopsy 6 months later. Sounds like your doctors are either old school or I am misunderstanding what they want to do.

If you are out of high school and out of college you don't need a diagnosis. If you already have one then you don't need one.

Either way go off gluten and if you feel better stay off gluten. Might need to go off dairy for a while to. (I am currently struggling with this one).

If you trust your doctors then do it. The biopsys aren't too bad (though I was in pain the next day after mine). The cost is what hurts.

Your decision. This is just my knowledge. B) Good Luck

RVluvin Apprentice

My biopsy was 2 mo ago, I just now got around to doing the follow up. I've been both gluten and latoce free since the day after the biopsy. Doctor wants to do another biopsy to see a healed small intestine. I think he wants another $185 from me and what ever the insurance give him.

I was hoping all that jipperish ment more than I have the celiac disease.

Booghead Contributor

Celiacs isn't simple or small. It's not just celaics. Don't do that negative thinking to yourself, what do want? Stomach Cancer? :ph34r: I only know the top part of the report you posted. Whatever else is on there I have no clue.

mushroom Proficient

You don't have cancer, you don't have a duodenal ulcer, you don't have an overgrowth of bad microorganisms. (My best interpretation :) )

rosetapper23 Explorer

Looks like you have bonafide celiac. With regard to the future biopsy, personally I would take a pass on that. No reason...unless you're not feeling any better or are feeling worse. If you're feeling pretty good, then I see no reason for repeating the biopsy. Case closed.

Di2011 Enthusiast

Diagnosis: Features suggestive of celiac disease, Marsh Type IIIB.

Microscopic description: marked villous atrophy.

There is crypt hyperplasia and an intraepitheial lymphocytosis that measures greater then 40 intraepithelial lymphocytes per 100 enterocytes. The lamina propria contains an increase in the number of mononuclear cells, particularly lymphocytes and plasma cells. There is no evidence of neoplasia associated with these changes. There is no evidence of peptic duodenitis or microorganisms.

Open Original Shared Link

Try having a read through these. It might help you make sense of the lingo.

I'm no guru ((someone please confirm or advise?)) but it seems to me that "marked villious atrophy" doesn't mean nil or mild villious atrophy ie you have "marked" damage to your villi therefore you have Celiac.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

I think the doctor wants to do the follow-up biopsy for his own curiosity (and enrichment). It is up to you whether you want to pay $185 to satisfy it. If you heal when off gluten, you KNOW what your problem is. You don't really need him to see for himself. Your report says that you have celiac disease, and that there is nothing else going on in there that is detectable by the biopsy. :)

psawyer Proficient

Your results indicate Marsh IIIB. The Marsh scale measures the degree of damage to the villi. It ranges from I (minimal damage) to IV (total destruction). You have (or had) severe damage to your villi. The probable cause is celiac disease.

RVluvin Apprentice

I thought that maybe there was an explaination to what degree of damage I had incured, or various degrees of celiacs. By the 3rd day of being gluten free, I knew this was the cure I had been searching for most of my life.

I'm glad to see that others agree with me that a second biopsy in 6 mo was in his best interest, not mine. Thanks!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,691
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Gigi2025
    Newest Member
    Gigi2025
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Symptoms that get worse if you don't supplement is a sign of malabsorption, possibly due to Celiac disease. Blood tests for nutritional deficiencies are not very accurate, and should be done when you have been off of supplements for eight to twelve weeks, otherwise the vitamin supplements you've taken will be measured.  The blood circulation system is a transportation system.  It transports the vitamins you've absorbed around the body, but blood tests don't give an accurate picture of the vitamin and mineral stores inside organs and tissues where they are actually used.  You can have "normal" blood levels but still have deficiencies.  This is because the brain demands stored nutrients be put into the blood stream to supply important organs, like the brain and heart, while other organs do without.   If you are taking Thiamine Mononitrate in your supplements, you are probably low in thiamine.  Thiamine Mononitrate is used in many supplements because it won't break down sitting on a shelf.  This also means Thiamine Mononitrate is difficult for the body to utilize.  Only thirty percent of Thiamine Mononitrate on the label is absorbed and even less is able to be utilized by the body.  A different form of Thiamine called Benfotiamine has been shown to promote intestinal healing.   Talk to your doctor about doing a genetic test to look for Celiac markers.   I'm concerned that if you do a gluten challenge (10 grams of gluten per day for a minimum off two weeks) in your weakened state, the nutritional deficiencies will become worse and possibly life threatening.  
    • ElisaAllergiesgluten
      Hello, good afternoon!   I apologize, I didn’t see a notification and I’m just reading this. Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and the link. Yes you are absolutely right, even so trying to get a response from them has been extremely difficult. They don’t answer but I will your practice of “guilty until proven innocent.”   I like and have a sense of trust here in this website, everyone is honest and thoughts are raw. The mutual understanding is amazing!   thank you Scott!
    • Scott Adams
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.