Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    GliadinX



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
    GliadinX


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Are Docs Skeptical Of Celiac Dx Without Biopsy?


Irishgirl76

Recommended Posts

Irishgirl76 Apprentice

Hi there,

My 7-year old daughter had an appointment with her pediatrician yesterday as I believe she has Asperger's Syndrome (which the doctor agreed on, and gave her the diagnosis). When she was examining her, she said "did I see in her file that she was being screened for Celiac?". I said yes, that she'd had the bloodwork done, and it came back positive. She said "yeah, I was gonna say... this girl needs a Celiac screening!" (based on her physique, I guess... size/weight/distended belly/thin arms). Kind of ticks me off that all these years of going to doctors with her various health concerns, and no one suggested Celiac... this doc notices right away, but after I had already insisted on Celiac testing... go figure! Anyway, on to the topic at hand...

I told her that her endoscopy was scheduled for Friday (tomorrow), and she said "Well, I see lots of kids with positive bloodwork but negative biopsies - she may not have it". So, even after noticing that she "looked" like a Celiac, thought she ought to be tested, found out that she had positive bloodwork, still doubted that she may have Celiac without that confirmational biopsy.

I told her that I had heard that biopsies can often result in false negatives... that damage can be patchy, they may not take enough samples, etc. She still seemed skeptical.

She is a fairly new pediatrician (young), so I was hoping she might be knowledgeable about false negative biopsies. When I mentioned it she seemed unconvinced...

Do most doctors still adhere to the biopsy as the gold standard? Her bloodwork was exceedingly positive (normal is <20, and hers were all >100 (they didn't even put the actual values, just >100... I'm guessing beyond that point it doesn't matter?)

So now I'm a bit concerned... are children more likely to have false negative biopsies, due to the fact that they haven't had as much time to damage their intestines? I am 100% certain she has Celiac, and I need the diagnosis in order to ensure her father takes it seriously (we are separated, and he lives at a distance, so visitation is 5x per year, 2 weeks at a time - I am completely at his mercy in making sure he follows the diet strictly).

She has all the signs - many years of loose stools, distended belly since infancy, colicky baby with reflux (more like projectile vomiting) that lasted over a year, stunted growth (she went from always being in the 50th percentile and above, to now being in only the 25th percentile), skin rashes, dark circles under her eyes, etc.

Anyway, I had accepted her very positive bloodwork as confirmation of her Celiac diagnosis, and now feel like I'm dependent on this biopsy to confirm the results.

Thoughts?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Authentic Foods
Tierra Farm



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Food for Life


StephanieL Enthusiast

Many Docs will not DX with just the blood work. Dr. Fasano recently listed 5 criteria for dx Celiac. I believe he feels if you have 4 any 3 or 4 of the 5, you have Celiac. I can't find the article right now but I know a few of them are

blood work

biopsy

genetics (I think, not 100% sure on that one)

responding to the gluten-free diet

Again, maybe someone else here can help locate the article. (small baby demanding my attention)

domesticactivist Collaborator

Here is the article with new criteria that i saw:

Open Original Shared Link

Regardless of what doc says, definitely do the diet after biopsy!

You might also look into GAPS diet, which was developed by a dr with an autistic son, and is based on the SCD which was also developed to help autism.

Our family has been on gaps for a year and seen major positive mental health changes with it as well as physical improvements. I recently did a gluten challenge and had a major crash with autism and ocd like symptoms after nearly two months of getting progressively worse.

domesticactivist Collaborator

Ps my daughter's endocrinologist suggested retesting my dd for celiac because she is still small even though she was tested last year, has been strictly gluten free all year, does not have any of the genetics, and had completely negative blood work when eating gluten last year. It's good she knows to screen for celiac... Too bad she didn't understand there is no point in running those tests now.

StephanieL Enthusiast

Here is the info I was speaking of:

"One, you have to have symptoms we know are related to celiac disease

mushroom Proficient

Here is the info I was speaking of:

This is the entire article: Open Original Shared Link

Two quotes from this interview I really appreciated, coming from Dr. Fasano himself:

"Confining the diagnosis to a rigid set of rules, which, by the way, I contributed to wrongly, does not reflect the real gluten world out there". I appreciated that mea culpa since those rules contributed to the suffering of so many of us.

And this one:

":We can no longer call celiac disease a gluten sensitive enteropathy, which means the gold standard is the biopsy. To me it is not gold any more. I don't even know if it is silver or bronze. I believe it is copper".

Let's hope we don't have to listen to that particular phrase much longer :rolleyes:

StephanieL Enthusiast

Sing it Mushroom ;)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Authentic Foods
Little Northern Bakehouse



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Food for Life


beebs Enthusiast

It depends where you are, here in Oz = you cannot be diagnosed at all, ever without a biopsy. Doesn't matter what your bloods say, or what the diet does, or how severe (even if they are life threatening) your symptoms are. Drives me insane!

samie Contributor

Yeah me and my oldest daughter were diagnose with it but my younger daughter only had positive blood work and biopsy was negative doctor said she probably is in the beginning stage of celiac but won't diagnose her.without th biopsy. It is aggravating cause her dad won't do the diet without the diagnose and I don't want to damage her any worse.

mushroom Proficient

It depends where you are, here in Oz = you cannot be diagnosed at all, ever without a biopsy. Doesn't matter what your bloods say, or what the diet does, or how severe (even if they are life threatening) your symptoms are. Drives me insane!

I can't even join the stinking COeliac Society because I don't have a a diagnosis. If that's the way they are, I don't want to :P

beebs Enthusiast

I can't even join the stinking COeliac Society because I don't have a a diagnosis. If that's the way they are, I don't want to :P

I joined still shroomy- the Dr just wrote a cert for severe gluten intolerance.

mushroom Proficient

Sing it Mushroom ;)

The problem is, Dr. Fasano knows it, and we know it, but our medical 'professionals' are going to take another 10-15 years to catch up. :rolleyes:

Benshell Explorer

Best way to answer you is to tell our story.

My now 8yr old was diagnosed with Celiac at age 5 via blood work (symptoms - frequent BM, lack of growth, big belly). The pediatric gastro wanted to do a scope - saying it was the "gold standard" of diagnosing celiac and it was the "norm". When I heard they put kids out completely, not a twilight sleep like adults, I got worried. I asked the dr what the outcome would be if it was positive - his response was that 98% of time time, the scope comes back positive for celiac when the blood work is positive and the result is having to go gluten free, then they recheck the bloodwork in 6 months to see if the antibodies have gone down. We suggested to him that she just try the gluten free diet and if her #'s go down in 6 months at the bloodwork, would that suffice as proof. He completely agreed with us and didn't fight us at all not doing the scope - he said better #'s would be proof but if it didn't improve he would have to scope her.

6 months later following a STRICT gluten free diet - no slip ups, no sneaking food, no contamination, her #'s were PERFECT. He said he has never seen anything like that - that there are always slip ups the first few months...he didn't realize he was dealing with an overly controlling OCD type of parent and child :)

We've followed the gluten-free diet with no problems. My daughter loves eating gluten-free, doesn't miss any food and realizes she's eating healthier than other kids. She's very smart, so her level of understanding is much better than other kids her age that try and sneak food. SHe has had a couple of "glutening" incidents due to contamination of potato chips at a party (other people were eating from it too) and at a restaurant. Otherwise, she's great and our family has gluten-free dinners every night (just easier to make). Otherwise we have a mixed household (gluten-free & not gluten-free) and just are very careful not to contaminate things - butter and condiments are labeled gluten-free or not, etc..

Good luck

Irishgirl76 Apprentice

Just a quick update... I got my daughter's biopsy results this morning and they were, indeed, positive. She said the villous atrophy was "moderate to marked". Is it weird that I am happy about an "official" diagnosis? lol. 10 more days until my own endoscopy, and until I can get rid of the gluten and start my recovery. Yaay!! :)

GFSAHmom Rookie

My son was >139 and the GI dr said he didnt even need to do the biopsy to confirm. He said, once it breaks the threshold of 100 it's absolutely positive. If the diet works and u get good results from your daughter gaining weight/feeling better/improving, that's the most important!!

Irishgirl76 Apprentice

My son was >139 and the GI dr said he didnt even need to do the biopsy to confirm. He said, once it breaks the threshold of 100 it's absolutely positive. If the diet works and u get good results from your daughter gaining weight/feeling better/improving, that's the most important!!

That's good to know... thanks. Although now that the biopsy is done (traumatic as it was), I'm glad we have the results and no one can refute them.

NHyogagirl Rookie

My daughter just had 14" of her intestines removed and I swear it is Celiac. Her surgeon says "no such thing". But another doc in hospital that is Integrative that trained under Andrew Weil said there are SO MANY FALSE negatives and people keep going on eating gluten and continuing to damage their intestines.

I can't get my daughter diagnosed since we have to go on gluten for 2 months and she absolutely can't do that. Just yesterday she had a reaction to seasoning on shrimp in a restaurant and was home sick all day with D and nausea.

Anyway, just wanted to post my thoughts about "false negatives" - my daughter will never get a diagnosis but we know for sure she can never eat gluten again.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
    Food for Life



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,980
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    mary lou grolimond olson
    Newest Member
    mary lou grolimond olson
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
    GliadinX


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
    GliadinX




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
    Food for Life



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      It sounds like your gastroenterologist is becoming increasingly confident that celiac disease is the likely diagnosis based on both your older and newer lab results. Her suggestion to call each Monday for possible cancellations is actually a great strategy—especially given how long the wait is until your August 29th appointment. It’s also a good sign that she’s advocating for you to be seen sooner, which shows she’s taking your case seriously. The fact that some labs might not have been drawn yet due to overlap with your functional health doctor’s upcoming testing adds a layer of confusion, but that’s unfortunately common when multiple providers are involved. Hopefully, the GI’s remaining labs will still get processed, or she can reorder them if needed. As for the colonoscopy prep, it’s totally understandable that you're dreading it—many people rank it among the least pleasant medical experiences. You’re definitely not alone in preferring the pill prep option over the liquid kind, especially if you don’t drink Gatorade and had a rough experience with Miralax in the past. Hopefully, your doctor will approve the pill form, especially since you’ve tolerated other options poorly before. Fortunately, the upper endoscopy doesn’t require any bowel prep—just fasting, usually starting the night before—so that part should be easier to handle. It’s great that you’re already trying to boost your gluten intake, but yes, tracking gluten content can be surprisingly tricky. You’re right that the general rule for wheat-based products is to multiply the protein content by about 0.75 to estimate the gluten content. That means foods like oyster crackers, while convenient, may not pack enough gluten to help reach the recommended daily goal of around 10 grams before biopsy. It’s helpful that you caught that early, and switching to more gluten-dense foods like regular wheat bread, pasta, or wheat cereals might make it easier to hit your target. It’s not easy eating more gluten when you’re trying to manage symptoms or just not used to it, but doing so can make a big difference in ensuring your biopsies are accurate. You’re on the right track—hopefully with a little luck, you’ll get a cancellation and be seen sooner.
    • cristiana
      Thanks for sharing that film, @trents.  I am not sure how I missed that film as I see it is a few years old, but it is very good.  I think you should be fine if you take your own packed lunch and eat it from your own lunchbox etc.  Might be worth doing a lunchtime recce to see how cramped the room is before making a decision - for all you know, there may be other people  there who don't eat gluten?
    • cameo674
      The GI doc messaged me this afternoon that she believes that the new blood work added to the old is definitely  looking like a celiac diagnosis is in my future.  She wants to me to call into scheduling each Monday to see if I can get my August 29th appointment moved up due to cancellations.  I have never had a doctor recommend that.  She also said there were additional labs that she requested still out that have not come back yet; so, they may have been missed drawing those since the functional health doctor has a whole slew of labs that I am suppose to be waiting until August 27th to do. I am still waiting to hear on whether or not she will allow me to do pill prep versus the typical gatorade prep that I did 8 years ago for that colonoscopy.  I do not drink gatorade to begin with and that miralax prep kept me in the bathroom up until we drove to the procedure.  My younger brother said the pill form was fairly easy when the liquid form is hard to swallow. Colonoscopy prep is definitely close to number one on the list of things I never want to experience again if I could avoid it.  Number one is a different medication that caused severe cramping that had me in tears until it wore off.  Never having had an endoscopy, I have no idea of what that prep is like, but it cannot be worse right? I started munching on oyster crackers last night.  It is shocking how filling they are.  I just read that I need to pay attention to the protein content of the wheat bread product or I will miss the gluten goal of 10 g per day prior to testing.  The post said that I should look at the protein and multiple that number by .75 if it is a wheat flour product to see how much gluten is in it.  No more oyster crackers for me.  I would have to eat 10 oz bag everyday to meet my goal.  not going to happen.
    • Alibu
      Well, I've made if from the pre-diagnosis forum to here!  I've been diagnosed with "latent" or "potential" celiac and my doctor has suggested me to go gluten-free before my appointment with him in October (first available, LOL).  My ttg-iga was 152, my EMA was positive, I have the gene, but my biopsy was negative (and he took 12 samples), so it makes sense to go gluten free to see if I improve. I know the basics - I can find lists of things to avoid, I know about hidden dangers, etc. all of that.  Where I'm struggling is just STARTING.  I need to go shopping and stock up on some staples.  My goal is to not try to find gluten-free alternatives, but to focus on naturally gluten-free foods like proteins, veggies, fruits, and carbs like potatoes and rice.  However, the rest of the household will not be gluten-free, which is fine, I don't want them to for various reasons.  But I have SO much food in my house in the pantry and fridge and cabinets, and it feels like I need to get rid of a lot in order for me to start fresh, but at the same time, I can't get rid of everything. I guess it's just feeling overwhelming and I've never given up gluten before so this is going to be a huge shift for me and I feel like I need SPACE, but I can't quite have that. Any advice on just getting started and organizing myself would be great!  
    • Scott Adams
      It’s great that you were finally able to see a gastroenterologist—and even luckier to get in the same day as your referral! It sounds like your GI is taking a very thorough approach, which is reassuring given your complex symptoms and history. The confusion around your different tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody results is understandable. The variation between your December and June labs may be due to multiple factors, including differences in the lab performing the test (Quest vs. Mayo Clinic), the specific assay used, and the amount of gluten you had been consuming before each test. Antibody levels can drop significantly when gluten is reduced or eliminated from the diet, even partially, which might explain why your recent tTG IgA was now negative and your tTG IgG was borderline high. That’s likely why your GI mentioned it was “usually the reverse”—typically, tTG IgA is more commonly elevated in confirmed celiac, not IgG alone, especially when IgA levels are sufficient, as yours are. Your gene testing confirms that you carry HLA types (DQ2.2 most likely) that are permissive for celiac disease, meaning you can develop it, but not everyone with these genes will. These genes don’t explain why your symptoms are milder or different from others with celiac—many people have so-called "silent" or atypical presentations like yours, with issues like long-term heartburn, loose stools, nutrient intolerances, or just gradually adapting to symptoms over time. It’s not uncommon to assume these symptoms are just aging, medication side effects, or lifestyle-related until someone finally connects the dots. It’s a good thing your daughter advocated for you to be tested—many cases are missed for years because they don’t follow the “textbook” presentation. As for the immunoglobulin tests, your doctor likely ordered those to ensure your immune system is functioning normally, particularly your IgA level, since a deficiency can cause false-negative celiac blood tests. Since your IgA level is normal, your tTG IgA test should be reliable (assuming adequate gluten intake), but again, if you weren't eating enough gluten, that could explain the lower antibody levels now. The comprehensive metabolic panel and negative stool parasite results are additional pieces ruling out other causes of your symptoms, like infections or organ dysfunction. The upcoming endoscopy and colonoscopy should provide more definitive answers, especially with biopsies looking for celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, and microscopic colitis. It’s completely valid to feel unsure about what you’re experiencing, especially when your symptoms have been lifelong or gradually worsening without being severe. You’re not alone—many adults with celiac or gluten-related disorders report subtle or chronic symptoms they’ve normalized. You’re doing the right thing by staying on gluten now through your procedure date in August. Try not to stress about reaching the full 6-slice equivalent each day, but do increase your gluten intake as much as tolerable (e.g., a couple of pieces of bread, pasta, crackers, etc.) to give the biopsy the best chance of detecting any damage. Good luck with your upcoming procedures—you’re closer than ever to answers and a clearer direction forward.
×
×
  • Create New...