Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help Interpreting Test Results


Chuck1004

Recommended Posts

Chuck1004 Apprentice

I can't thank everyone enough to for the feedback they provided over the past few days. It's really help me come to grips with my new diagnosis.

Speaking of, I received the results in the mail. Can I get some feedback again on specifically what it means? I asked the Doctor yesterday if there was a Marsh level for me and she indicated they didn't specifically test for that. Here's what I did receive.

Final Pathologic Diagnosis:

A. Duodenum Biopsy - Duodenal mucosa with increased intraepithelial lymphocytes and normal villous architecture; (see note)

Note: A CD3 immunostain demonstrates increased intraepithelial lymphocytes throughout most of the architecturally preserve villi. Although non-specific, in conjunction with the known positive serum IgA TTG, the findings support a diagnosis of celiac disease.

Gross Description - Received in formalin, is .4 x .3 x.1 cm aggregate of tissue fragments. Entirely in A1.

Prior to receiving the results my fear was the IgA TTG was going to point me elsewhere. Is this more conclusive than it sounds?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GottaSki Mentor

"CD3 immunostain demonstrates increased intraepithelial lymphocytes throughout most of the architecturally preserve villi"

Increased lymphocytes is certainly part of Celiac Disease...that your villi seem to have little damage is great news.

I don't recall what your tTG IgA result was...there are often false negatives, but positive is positive for Celiac Disease -- a positive antibody test together with increased intraepithelial lymphocytes is certainly enough for a diagnosis.

Sounds like you are fortunate to have the gotten the diagnosis before more serious damage was done to your intestinal walls.

Welcome and Good Luck to you!

Chuck1004 Apprentice

Thanks Lisa!

My TTG IGA was 45.62, with the normal range being 0-15. My antigliadin antibodies were both normal. When that was the only result I had back, I had read online that, "TTG false positivity has been described in patients with both type I diabetes and autoimmune hepatitis. Theoretically, it can also be falsely positive in other autoimmune disease."

As I'm asymptomatic and had mildly elevated LFT/fatty liver, I was afraid it would be one of the other issues mentioned above. I guess my issue when I posted today was do I have two inconclusive results that together may mean celiac's disease or two inconclusive results that together almost certainly mean celiac disease.

Put another way, intraepithelial lymphocytes couldn't mean anything else, right? :rolleyes:

And thank you very much!!!

Chuck1004 Apprentice

And followup stupid question of the day, but do the symptoms generally follow villi damage? I wondered if the normal villi was why I might be asymptomatic.

Skylark Collaborator

You have a Marsh 1 biopsy. The intraepithelial lymphocytes are CD3+ natural killer cells that have infiltrated your intestinal epithelium from your lymph nodes. This is the first stage of celiac disease. They are being directed to kill your villi by the anti-TTG antibodies. There isn't much chance anything else is going on. Celiac can elevate liver enzymes.

It's possible that you are less symptomatic because of the lower level of damage. Do remember that a biopsy only looks at a tiny fraction of your intestine and there could be more damage elsewhere.

GFinDC Veteran

Hi Chuck,

Here is an article on Nature.com from The American Journal of Gastroenterology that discusses the Marsh score for damage to the villi in celiac disease.

Open Original Shared Link

This article discusses the antibodies and testing:

Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results celiac com

GottaSki Mentor

And followup stupid question of the day, but do the symptoms generally follow villi damage? I wondered if the normal villi was why I might be asymptomatic.

That is not a stupid question and even if it were -- this is the place to ask any question with regard to Celiac Disease!

Your theory would be true if comparing just you and I because I had severe symptoms for many years before I was finally diagnosed - my original endo revealed severe villi atrophy and all my biopsies were very high on the Marsh Scale.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Chuck1004 Apprentice

Thank you everybody for the information. That was exactly what I was looking for!

I'm about to go and restock the shelves with gluten free products so I'm not walking around the house drooling. :) Plenty of gluten free wraps and buns so I can at least look at the local burger joint without tearing up. :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. 0

      Penobscot Bay, Maine: Nurturing Gluten-Free Wellness Retreat with expert celiac dietitian, Melinda Dennis

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    3. - Jane02 replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,326
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PattyPagnanelli
    Newest Member
    PattyPagnanelli
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
    • Jane02
      Thanks @Scott Adams. Do you know if Kirkland Signature supplements share facility and production lines with other products containing gluten?  I'm worried that I'll react to this brand just like I did with other gluten-free labelled supplement brands. 
    • Matthias
    • Scott Adams
      This is a really common area of confusion. Most natural cheeses (cheddar, Swiss, mozzarella, Parmesan, brie, camembert, and most blue cheeses) are inherently gluten-free, and you’re right that the molds used today are typically grown on gluten-free media. The bigger risks tend to come from processed cheeses: shredded cheese (anti-caking agents), cheese spreads, beer-washed rinds, smoke-flavored cheeses, and anything with added seasonings or “natural flavors,” where cross-contact can happen. As for yeast, you’re also correct — yeast itself is gluten-free. The issue is the source: brewer’s yeast and yeast extracts can be derived from barley unless labeled gluten-free, while baker’s yeast is generally safe. When in doubt, sticking with whole, unprocessed cheeses and products specifically labeled gluten-free is the safest approach, especially if you’re highly sensitive.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.