Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Frustrated - Normal Bloodwork


Pisqualie

Recommended Posts

Pisqualie Apprentice

Hi all! I am new here. I never suspected a wheat or gluten problem (always thought it was lactose or stress) until I read a book called Wheat Belly. My husband and I switched to a "real food" lifestyle a year ago, but I still felt bad all the time. (Fatigue, bloating which is at times extreme, quick weight gain regardless of diet/exercise when I have otherwise been thin my whole life). Anyway, decided to cut wheat just to see impact on my body - wow, within 3 days I was slimmer, had a solid blood sugar (thought I was hypoglycemic before but dr and blood sugar monitoring said no), etc.

Then... I ate wheat again and boy was I sick!!! Now, for nearly a month, I have been essentially wheat/gluten free, except when I accidentally consume it or when I decide I am not, eat it, and then get sick. Example: today I had a hamburger and ate the bun. I had 5 bites of bun. Within 10-15 minutes, I felt that feeling in my stomach. Then my intestines. Then, 1 hr and 15 mins later, I was doubling over, with a sense of urgency in a pain that makes my heart beat strange and use the restroom.

It has to be the wheat, right??

Anyway, I literally just got off the phone with the nurse - my bloodwork from Wednesday came back totally negative. I don't want Celiac - I am thankful! But... I am frustrated. I mean... what else can it be? I keep testing it out and everything lines up exactly with what you all and others have said about their reactions and responses.

My GI dr wants to do an upper and lower GI .. should I follow through with that?

Thanks so much!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lesliev523 Rookie

Hi all! I am new here. I never suspected a wheat or gluten problem (always thought it was lactose or stress) until I read a book called Wheat Belly. My husband and I switched to a "real food" lifestyle a year ago, but I still felt bad all the time. (Fatigue, bloating which is at times extreme, quick weight gain regardless of diet/exercise when I have otherwise been thin my whole life). Anyway, decided to cut wheat just to see impact on my body - wow, within 3 days I was slimmer, had a solid blood sugar (thought I was hypoglycemic before but dr and blood sugar monitoring said no), etc.

Then... I ate wheat again and boy was I sick!!! Now, for nearly a month, I have been essentially wheat/gluten free, except when I accidentally consume it or when I decide I am not, eat it, and then get sick. Example: today I had a hamburger and ate the bun. I had 5 bites of bun. Within 10-15 minutes, I felt that feeling in my stomach. Then my intestines. Then, 1 hr and 15 mins later, I was doubling over, with a sense of urgency in a pain that makes my heart beat strange and use the restroom.

It has to be the wheat, right??

Anyway, I literally just got off the phone with the nurse - my bloodwork from Wednesday came back totally negative. I don't want Celiac - I am thankful! But... I am frustrated. I mean... what else can it be? I keep testing it out and everything lines up exactly with what you all and others have said about their reactions and responses.

My GI dr wants to do an upper and lower GI .. should I follow through with that?

Thanks so much!!

You can have non-celiac gluten intolerance. Or if you had not been eating gluten or very much gluten prior to the blood test, you can have a false negative.

Good luck!

raea2002 Apprentice

It depends on if you need a concrete diagnosis or can live without it. I too went through something similar and accidentally found my intolerance to it. I went through all the testing and I found out that I had acid reflux and gastritis. I had no clue. So for me it was worth it. Biopsy's came up negative for celiacs. I'm just gluten intolerant. Do what you feel you need to do. If you feel better off gluten stay off. If your wanting to do further testing you have to be eatting gluten now. Keep us posted.

MitziG Enthusiast

You have your answer I think. You know what makes you feel bad. A blood taste only dx MOST celiacs, not all. And it does not dx people who are gluten intolerant but do not haPpen to mage antibodies against it, who are in the majority. So...it is quite simple. Want to feel good? Don't eat gluten anymore!

Cara in Boston Enthusiast

Were you eating the equiv. of 2 slice of wheat bread a day in the 3-6 months leading up to your blood tests? If not, I would not assume that they are showing you an accurate picture of what is going on. If you don't want to (or can't ) do a proper gluten challenge (eat gluten daily for 3-6 months) I wouldn't bother trying to get re-tested. Sounds like from your experience with the diet you already know you should not be eating gluten.

If you have kids, they should be tested too - while still eating a "regular" diet.

Cara

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,685
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tdouglas2901
    Newest Member
    tdouglas2901
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.