Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Vitamin D

ShannonA

Recommended Posts

ShannonA Contributor
ShannonA
Posted

What is the difference between vitamin D and D3? I saw both at the store an don't know the difference. About a year ago my doctor put me on vitamin D because of low levels and now I want to start them again but I don't know the difference between the two.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


IrishHeart Veteran
IrishHeart
Posted

this may shed some light?

Open Original Shared Link

ShannonA Contributor
ShannonA
Posted
  • Author

this may shed some light?

Open Original Shared Link

Thank you!
Marilyn R Community Regular
Marilyn R
Posted

That was a good article, Irish, thanks for sharing.

OP, I like Vitamin D 3 drops. You just stick a drop in your water, juice, whatever. It's tasteless. I get mine at the healthfood store.

IrishHeart Veteran
IrishHeart
Posted

Me, too--I take D3, 2000 IUs now (I was tanked in D upon DX and at one time was told to take 5,000 IUs until the level came up over 60) and I have used both capsules and sub-lingual drops.

Some people use the D2, but I think the D3 is preferable?

frieze Community Regular
frieze
Posted

Me, too--I take D3, 2000 IUs now (I was tanked in D upon DX and at one time was told to take 5,000 IUs until the level came up over 60) and I have used both capsules and sub-lingual drops.

Some people use the D2, but I think the D3 is preferable?

Yup, don't take that D2 ...stuff. getting sun is even better. no sun tanning, that actually sort of, defeats the concept....

  • 2 weeks later...
Kar1972 Newbie
Kar1972
Posted

I have low vitamin D too. Last check was at 41 and I'm taking 5,000 IU per day! Will it ever be in the normal range? Is this a celiac thing?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


IrishHeart Veteran
IrishHeart
Posted

I have low vitamin D too. Last check was at 41 and I'm taking 5,000 IU per day! Will it ever be in the normal range? Is this a celiac thing?

It will come up in time as your gut heals. Eat foods with Vitamin D, too and get some sunshine.

41 is within normal range, according to the lab where I have my tests done, but some suggest over 60 is optimal.

kristenloeh Community Regular
kristenloeh
Posted

When I was diagnosed my D levels were at 17. Not sure where they are at now, but I'm on about 6,000 IU a day.

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

My vit D was 25 with a range of 30-100 so the doc put me on Vit D3 5,000 IU per day & I got the drops too but have been unable to tolerate them at those rates. Made me get the shaky kind of indigestion & made me nauseous. I tried 1/2 the dose & still couldn't do it. I have discovered that 1/2 dose 2 or 3 times per week is the max. I can tolerate.

frieze Community Regular
frieze
Posted

My vit D was 25 with a range of 30-100 so the doc put me on Vit D3 5,000 IU per day & I got the drops too but have been unable to tolerate them at those rates. Made me get the shaky kind of indigestion & made me nauseous. I tried 1/2 the dose & still couldn't do it. I have discovered that 1/2 dose 2 or 3 times per week is the max. I can tolerate.

get out in the sun! if you are fair skinned, you may need to break it up, but 15-20 daily, with large skin areas exposed, no sun screen. NOT enough to tan, that defeats the purpose.

Kar1972 Newbie
Kar1972
Posted

Is sunlight from a window on your lower legs good enough? That's the kind of exposure I get.

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

I do that twice a day.

IrishHeart Veteran
IrishHeart
Posted

When I was diagnosed my D levels were at 17. Not sure where they are at now, but I'm on about 6,000 IU a day.

Your doc should check you after 6 months of supplementing.

And IMHO, any sunshine is a good thing.

kristenloeh Community Regular
kristenloeh
Posted

Your doc should check you after 6 months of supplementing.

And IMHO, any sunshine is a good thing.

I LOVE the sun, but the catch is, I live in Seattle. So we only get MAYBE 2 months a year if we are lucky of sun.

IrishHeart Veteran
IrishHeart
Posted

I LOVE the sun, but the catch is, I live in Seattle. So we only get MAYBE 2 months a year if we are lucky of sun.

Sorry, hon. :(

er, um, move to California? (just teasing)

I've been to Seattle. Had a blast!! Pike Place Market, very cool.

GottaSki Mentor
GottaSki
Posted

I find this subject very interesting. At diagnosis my D was at 17 - I live in sunny San Diego and rarely missed at least a 45 minute walk outside - most days I was out in the sun much more than that.

I have been above 35 for about a year, but don't think I would have got there without supplementation.

So while sunshine is very important - for vitamin D and much more - I don't think it is possible to get enough strictly from sunshine.

Edited to add: for me it was the combination of removing gluten and supplementation == for the first year gluten-free I supplemented D specifically - for the past couple years I've been fine with getting it from food + sun :)

frieze Community Regular
frieze
Posted

I find this subject very interesting. At diagnosis my D was at 17 - I live in sunny San Diego and rarely missed at least a 45 minute walk outside - most days I was out in the sun much more than that.

I have been above 35 for about a year, but don't think I would have got there without supplementation.

So while sunshine is very important - for vitamin D and much more - I don't think it is possible to get enough strictly from sunshine.

Edited to add: for me it was the combination of removing gluten and supplementation == for the first year gluten-free I supplemented D specifically - for the past couple years I've been fine with getting it from food + sun :)

it could be a combo of issues, not right time of day, not enough skin exposed, and ? too vigorous washing too soon after exposure. maybe a very low fat diet?

GottaSki Mentor
GottaSki
Posted

it could be a combo of issues, not right time of day, not enough skin exposed, and ? too vigorous washing too soon after exposure. maybe a very low fat diet?

Still seems strange. When I was extremely low I was out ALL times of the day with at least head, arms, part of legs exposed - only used sunscreen if I was going to be out longer than 1/2 hour. Never wash vigorously afterward...except for my face. Pre- celiac diet was not intentionally low fat - sure I was getting plenty between meat, cheese and oils/butter from cooking.

I am in the sun FAR less now - severe heat allergy has worsened so I only exercise before 8am, but am now absorbing nutrients from food -- I'm not saying that we do not get Vitamin D from sunshine, only that it is puzzling that I wasn't getting enough when exposed to quite a bit of sun each day prior to Celiac Dx.

frieze Community Regular
frieze
Posted

Still seems strange. When I was extremely low I was out ALL times of the day with at least head, arms, part of legs exposed - only used sunscreen if I was going to be out longer than 1/2 hour. Never wash vigorously afterward...except for my face. Pre- celiac diet was not intentionally low fat - sure I was getting plenty between meat, cheese and oils/butter from cooking.

I am in the sun FAR less now - severe heat allergy has worsened so I only exercise before 8am, but am now absorbing nutrients from food -- I'm not saying that we do not get Vitamin D from sunshine, only that it is puzzling that I wasn't getting enough when exposed to quite a bit of sun each day prior to Celiac Dx.

could have been a degree of fat malabsorbtion, do you/did you take a statin?

GottaSki Mentor
GottaSki
Posted

could have been a degree of fat malabsorbtion, do you/did you take a statin?

no meds then or now....maybe it could have been fat malabsorbtion since I was low in every other nutrient measured at diagnosis. Sure didn't seem like I was having a problem absorbing fat -- was always far too heavy for the healthful diet I ate along with getting plenty of exercise.

It does makes me curious, but am happy that although I still have serious health problems caused by decades of undiagnosed celiac - absorption no longer seems to be one of them :)

IrishHeart Veteran
IrishHeart
Posted

So while sunshine is very important - for vitamin D and much more - I don't think it is possible to get enough strictly from sunshine.

Edited to add: for me it was the combination of removing gluten and supplementation == for the first year gluten-free I supplemented D specifically - for the past couple years I've been fine with getting it from food + sun :)

Yes, I do not think any of us suggested sunshine alone would boost those D levels up where she needs them, rather we suggested it would help. (makes me want to move to Florida. The winters are long up here in the Northeast)

Medline:

Ten to 15 minutes of sunshine three times weekly is enough to produce the body's requirement of vitamin D. The sun needs to shine on the skin of your face, arms, back, or legs (without sunscreen). Because exposure to sunlight is a risk for skin cancer, you should use sunscreen after a few minutes in the sun.

and from a recent U.S News Health report (citing a study from the Archives of Internal Medicine):

"In the winter, it's impossible to produce vitamin D from the sun if you live north of Atlanta because the sun never gets high enough in the sky for its ultraviolet B rays to penetrate the atmosphere. But summer is a great time to stock up on the nutrient. When the sun's UV-B rays hit the skin, a reaction takes place that enables skin cells to manufacture vitamin D. If you're fair skinned, experts say going outside for 10 minutes in the midday sun—in shorts and a tank top with no sunscreen—will give you enough radiation to produce about 10,000 international units of the vitamin. Dark-skinned individuals and the elderly also produce less vitamin D, and many folks don't get enough of the nutrient from dietary sources like fatty fish and fortified milk.

The government's dietary recommendations are 200 IUs a day up to age 50, 400 IUs to age 70, and 600 IUs over 70. But many experts believe that these recommendations are far too low to maintain healthful vitamin D levels. They advocate for supplementation in the winter of about 2,000 IUs per day and a dose of daily sunshine in the summer."

heather806 Rookie
heather806
Posted

I've crawled my way from 13 to 44 in the past year by taking 2,000 IU's of D3 each day...but I wasn't gluten free until my diagnosis in June, so I am hoping my absorption improves. My B-12 is great, 875! (am supplementing with B-12 but bad about taking it every day)

IrishHeart Veteran
IrishHeart
Posted

I've crawled my way from 13 to 44 in the past year by taking 2,000 IU's of D3 each day...but I wasn't gluten free until my diagnosis in June, so I am hoping my absorption improves. My B-12 is great, 875! (am supplementing with B-12 but bad about taking it every day)

Sounds like you are making good progress and yes, absorption will improve and those vitamin levels should normalize more rapidly.

Hang in there!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,898
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    MLucia
    Newest Member
    MLucia
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By Judy M · Posted

      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten free beer ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.