Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New To Celiac...


SusanB26

Recommended Posts

SusanB26 Newbie

Hi to everyone.

 

Long story short...  I already have autoimmune thyroid issues (Hashimotos) and unbeknownst to me have had symptoms of having Celiac/Gluten issues for a long time.  Autoimmune issues strongly run in my family; my father and his sibling all have (had) autoimmune disease, Type 1 diabetes, RA, and now we realize my dad most likely had Celiac but passed away from cancer before he could be properly diagnosed-but had lifelong stomach and skin issues.

 

I went to an allergist for allergy testing because I had been feeling so horrible.  Achy, exhausted, gastro issues, acne, eczema, migraines, etc.  Found out I was allergic to onion and garlic (alliums) which has proven difficult but do-able with a lot of work and effort.  He also suggested I go dairy and gluten free and do an oral challenge so I did.  Diary I'm finding I'm ok with in small quantities and never fat-free dairy. Gluten on the other hand?  Once I stopped gluten EVERYTHING went away.  I am never achy or exhausted, my eczema is GONE for the first time in 25 years.  And the weirdest thing?  I had dark patches of skin on my knees, 2 on each knee in a pattern... 4 different Drs over 10 years and nobody had a diagnosis other than "it's just dark patches of skin". No cream, skin bleach, lemon treatment, alpha-hydroxy could get rid of it.  All but the darkest one that first appeared at the age of 12 is GONE, and even the dark one is about 75% lighter.  It's like a miracle to me!

 

Anyway, the allergist tested my antibodies for Celiac AFTER he told me to go gluten free.  I would NOT go back to gluten if you paid me.  The test came back as a weak positive and he said to see a gastro for an endoscopy.  I then went ahead and ordered a gene test and found that I carry the celiac gene on side (probably my dads no doubt) and a gene that tends to cause gluten intolerance on the other side.

 

I am gluten free now for 3 months and so much better.  I know I had some antibodies even after being gluten free (but not enough to be called positive).  I already have an auto immune disease.  Should I go through with the endoscopy?  I feel odd saying "I have Celiac" when I haven't had a medical diagnosis, but do I really need one?  I know "they" say the only real way for an official diagnosis is through an endoscopy, but...

 

What are your opinions on this?  I appreciate everyone's time and knowledge and hope to become part of this community. :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

If you have been gluten free, an endo won't diagnosis you with Celiac. You need to be eating gluten, making antibodies and destroying your intestines to get a positive biopsy.

SusanB26 Newbie

I have read it takes a long time for damage to heal after years of symptoms, and that 3 months is still enough time to be gluten free and get an endoscopy diagnosis?

kareng Grand Master

I have read it takes a long time for damage to heal after years of symptoms, and that 3 months is still enough time to be gluten free and get an endoscopy diagnosis?

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

mamaw Community Regular

please  believe  Kareng  on this one...

SusanB26 Newbie

I believe!!  LOL  That's why I came here to post this question.  I want real life expertise and opinions, not a Drs.  I was put through the ringer by Drs over the years with my thyroid.  That's a long story too, but I've come to be my own advocate, making educated decisions not just listening to docs.

 

So what would you do?  Live life as a Celiac, say you have Celiac (since the odds are against me anyway, that's most likely what it is just need one more test to totally confrim) and just go on with life?  Or would you eat gluten, feel absolutely horrible and then get an endoscopy?

 

Do any of you feel the need to have the diagnosis "validated"?  Is there any true benefit to it?

 

I am strict gluten free and feel perfectly fine again for the most part.  When I feel bad I'll get achy/tired and/or gasto issues and I'm usually able to trace it back to something that may have been cross-contaminated or had onion/garlic in it (which is harder than the gluten to be honest... any food that just says "spice" I can't eat without emailing the company).  A few days will go by and I feel better again.

 

Thank you!

Ikgbrd Apprentice

I'm experiencing the same problem as you. My doctors said to go gluten free, and after a month in they told me to go back on it for testing. There's no way I'm doing it either, I'm still not feeling completely better yet but my progress is still pretty good.

I decided to get the endoscopy anyway. Whether or not I get an accurate celiac diagnosis, the end result is the same, no more gluten. And maybe they'll spot some other problems as well, because my digestive tract is quite obviously still having problems. I'd say definitely do the test, worse case scenario is that it'll be inconclusive, but you could still possibly get some answers.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



notme Experienced

my opinion is:  a weak positive is still positive.  false negatives are common, false positives are not so much.  personally, you couldn't pay me enough $$$ to eat gluten every day for 3 weeks (when you already have your answer)  - i mean, unless you need it for legal/insurance reasons or whatnot.  and even then.................  not worth it to me  :)

notme Experienced

I'm experiencing the same problem as you. My doctors said to go gluten free, and after a month in they told me to go back on it for testing. There's no way I'm doing it either, I'm still not feeling completely better yet but my progress is still pretty good.

I decided to get the endoscopy anyway. Whether or not I get an accurate celiac diagnosis, the end result is the same, no more gluten. And maybe they'll spot some other problems as well, because my digestive tract is quite obviously still having problems. I'd say definitely do the test, worse case scenario is that it'll be inconclusive, but you could still possibly get some answers.

right.  i didn't go back on it for my scope, either, and we were mainly interested in ruling out other problems.  when she took a look she could actually see the damage indicative of celiac.  therefore, combined with response to the diet, she declared me celiac.  whoop de doo  ;)  lolz - still means the same thing:  no gluten = feel better all over  :)

1desperateladysaved Proficient

I am glad you are having improvements after gluten free!  I didn't have an endoscopy.  I had obvious bloating (5 months pregnant maybe?),

A really positive genetic test, positive response to diet, and a doctor who had respect for and listens to  her patients.  Since my diagnosis, I have been found to have mal-absorption, food intolerances to nearly everything I was eating, and tenderness of the small intestine.  I have also had a repeat nutrient absorption test in which my body was shown to be absorbing better!  I won't eat gluten again.  I feel good about the testing I have had and confident that no endoscopy would have changed my current treatment plan.  For me, it wasn't worth the gluten challenge, for sure.  However, each one can make the decision about what is right for them.

 

No thanks to destroying intestines; I spent 30+ years doing that and now I am better.

nvsmom Community Regular

I agree that a weak positive is still a positive, especially if you ad been gluten-free for a time prior to testing. Those celiac tests are pretty specific to celiac (meaning it's not likely that a positive test is caused by another condition).  Tis report, on page 12, shows how specific and sensitive each of the celiac tests are: Open Original Shared Link

 

I skipped the biopsy too. I was prtty sure my symptoms were caused by celiac after I had a positive blood test. I figured that if there were other issues, then I might as well wait to do an endoscopy and let the celiac damage heal before they had a look.

 

You might want to request some nutrient testing though. Celiacs are often low in potassium, iron, ferritin, D, B12, calcium, zinc and folate.

 

Welcome to the boards and best wishes in whatever you decide to do.

txgal748 Apprentice

I never went through an endoscopy.  My celiac panel was through the roof, so when I went to see the gastroenterologist he just ordered the DNA test. So, it is possible that you have had some healing over the past few months that would show a weak positive.  I was fine with not having the endoscopy because I know I feel much better.

  • 1 month later...
SusanB26 Newbie

Thank you to everyone who responded.  I chose not to have the endoscopy/biopsy.  I feel somuch better being gluten free I can't begin to imagine my life back on it.  I had heartburn/reflux that I thought I might want to get the endoscopy for, but now that too is simply gone.  I am living life as a Celiac and now use the term freely and comfortably.  The more research I did the more I realized you don't need a biopsy to confirm it.  Between family history, my own autoimmune issues, the gene test, and the presence of the anitbodies, I think I have my answer.

AlwaysLearning Collaborator

I passed on having an endoscopy run and my new gastroenterologist hasn't pressured me to get one. He says that if I am reacting to gluten, then I really shouldn't be consuming it. And though I'm a little curious as to how much damage may have been done, in a way, I don't really want to know. I know that much of it has already healed.

Plus, from what I've read, the chances of false negatives are pretty high (unless you have a doctor that understands celiac) so getting the test could just as easily result in a false negative.

I do have hope for the future though. There is talk of new tests that could require a much shorter retox period of days rather than weeks, or that rely on newly-discovered markers in the blood rather than the invasive endoscopy procedure that has to be done in a hospital.

I'm with you. The thought of retoxing now is so horrifying to me that I may never get tested. I also don't feel the need to have confirmed what my body has already told me. If other's don't understand my new diet regime, that is their problem. Often it is fellow family members who are the least likely to believe you - most likely because that would mean that they need to take it seriously too. If they can't understand the ramifications of the genetic testing that you've already had done, then there is a good chance they also won't be willing to go gluten free even if they should.

If I do need to get a diagnosis confirmed in triplicate for some reason down the road, I just hope it is far enough in the future that the science and medical practices are a lot better than what we have available to us today.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to Heatherisle's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      34

      Blood results

    2. - Known1 replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      FDA looking for input on Celiac Gluten sensitivity labeling PLEASE READ and submit your suggestions

    3. - Wheatwacked replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      31

      results from 13 day gluten challenge - does this mean I can't have celiac?

    4. - Wheatwacked replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      31

      results from 13 day gluten challenge - does this mean I can't have celiac?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,411
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    EBeloved
    Newest Member
    EBeloved
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
    • Wheatwacked
      Celiac Disease causes more vitamin D deficiency than the general population because of limited UV sunlight in the winter and the little available from food is not absorbed well in the damaged small intestine.  Taking 10,000 IU a day (250 mcg) a day broke my depression. Taking it for eleven years.  Doctor recently said to not stop.  My 25(OH)D is around 200 nmol/L (80 ng/ml) but it took about six years to get there.  Increasing vitamin D also increases absorption of Calcium. A good start is 100-gram (3.5-ounce) serving of salmon,  vitamin D from 7.5 to 25 mcg (300 to 1,000 IU) but it is going to take additional vitamin D supplement to be effective.  More importantly salmon has an omega-6 to omega-3 ratio 1:10 anti-inflammatory compared to the 15:1 infammatory ratio of the typical Western diet. Vitamin D and Depression: Where is all the Sunshine?
    • Known1
      Thank you for sharing your thoughts.  I respectfully disagree.  You cherry picked a small section from the page.  I will do the same below: The agency is seeking information on adverse reactions due to “ingredients of interest” (i.e., non-wheat gluten containing grains (GCGs) which are rye and barley, and oats due to cross-contact with GCGs) and on labeling issues or concerns with identifying these “ingredients of interest” on packaged food products in the U.S. “People with celiac disease or gluten sensitives have had to tiptoe around food, and are often forced to guess about their food options,” said FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H. “We encourage all stakeholders to share their experiences and data to help us develop policies that will better protect Americans and support healthy food choices.” --- end quote Anyone with celiac disease is clearly a stakeholder.  The FDA is encouraging us to share our experiences along with any data to help develop future "policies that will better protect Americans and support healthy food choices".  I see this as our chance to speak up or forever hold our peace.  Like those that do not participate in elections, they are not allowed to complain.  The way I see it, if we do not participate in this request for public comment/feedback, then we should also not complain when we get ill from something labeled gluten-free. Have a blessed day ahead, Known1
    • Wheatwacked
      Here is a link to the spreadsheet I kept to track my nutrition intakes.  Maybe it will give you ideas. It is not https so browsers may flag a security warning. There is nothing to send or receive. http://doodlesnotes.net/index3.html I tracked everything I ate, used the National Nutrition Database https://www.foodrisk.org/resources/display/41 to add up my daily intake and supplemented appropriately.  It tracks about 30 nutrients at once.
    • Wheatwacked
      Hello @catnapt, That's so true.  Every person with Celiac Disease has different symptoms.  There are over 200 that it mimics.  Too many still believe that it is only a childhood disease you outgrow.  Or it's psychosomatic or simply a fad.  Idiots.  It's easy to get angry at all of them.   You just have to pick at the answers until you find the ones that work for you.  I too suffer from not being able to take the drugs that work for "everyone else".  SSRIs make me twitch ane feel like toothpicks are holding my eye open, ARBs cripple me.  Statins cause me intestinal Psuedo Obstruction.  Espresso puts me to sleep.  I counted 19 different symptoms that improved from GFD and dealing with my nutritional defecits.  I couldn't breath through my mouth until I started GFD at 64 years old.   My son was born with celiac disease, biopsy diagnosed at weaning.   So why are we the one-percenters.  Why, after being silent for so long, does it suddenly flare? There is the possibility that you have both Celiac Disease and Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity.  NCGS was not established as a diagnosis until 1980.  NCGS is diagnost by first elimating Celiac Disease as the cause, and showing improvement on GFD.  Nothing says you can't have symptoms from both.  Wheatbelly: Total Nutrition by Dr. Davis was helpful to me. We come to the forum to share what we've learned in dealing with our own symptoms.  Maybe this will help someone. Speaking of which if you don't mind; what is your 25(OH)D vitamin D blood level?  You mentioned a mysterious Calcium issue. Vitamin D, Calcium and Iodine are closely interactive. It is not uncommon for postmenopausal women to have insufficient intake of Iodine.   (RDA): Average daily level of intake sufficient to meet the nutrient requirements of nearly all (97%–98%) healthy individuals; often used to plan nutritionally adequate diets for individuals You are a one-percenter.  You may need higher intake of some essential nutrient supplements to speed up repairing the damages.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.