Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

No Scaling = No Celiac


MChase

Recommended Posts

MChase Apprentice

I had my colonoscopy and an endoscopy today. The GI dr said my colon is fine. No ulcerative colitis, diverticulitis, or Crohns. He also said that there were no signs of scaling in my small intestine so Celiac is unlikely. He did take 7 biopsies (not sure from which end). He said not to go gluten free just yet.

So the diagnosis now is gastritis. He gave me a prescription for Prilosec 40mg. If I am going out and feel nervous about things, I could take Immodium. No follow up yet. They will calk with biopsy results and make a follow up at that time. Results can take anywhere between 2 days and 2 weeks. All this was relayed to me by my husband because I was still out of it from the anesthia.

I have not had a celiac blood panel yet. When I asked the GI about it at the consult, he said the endoscopy was the gold standard for testing for Celiac. When I asked my primary Dr (when she referred me to the GI), she said the GI dr would do blood tests. My primary was the one who stated she thought I had Celiac.

If my biopsy is negative, should I ask the GI Dr for a Celiac panel or ask my primary dr? 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



answerseeker Enthusiast

Biopsy is the gold standard. It will show more than blood tests

MChase Apprentice

Can't one have negative biopsy and still have positive blood tests and be Celiac? I am not sure how many biopsies he took of the small intestine. The nurse said a total of 7 biopsies from both my colonoscopy and egd, but she didn't know how many from what section.

answerseeker Enthusiast

You could but I think they will still use the biopsy as the diagnostic tool. Others can chime in if they have a different opinion. From my understanding, without damage there won't be antibodies in the blood. However, damage is speradic and could be missed in the biopsy sample which is why they should take 4-7 samples.

Most people have had neg blood work and positive biopsy but I have seen a few with the opposite

shadowicewolf Proficient

Can't one have negative biopsy and still have positive blood tests and be Celiac? I am not sure how many biopsies he took of the small intestine. The nurse said a total of 7 biopsies from both my colonoscopy and egd, but she didn't know how many from what section.

Yes, I am a person who has.

 

The thing with the biopsies is that the doctors can miss damage. Most damage is microscopic.

 

You only need 4 of the 5 dx criteria to be dx'd with celiac according to the leading expert of it.

 

Positive blood test

Positive Biopsy

Positve genetic test

Symptoms related to celiac

Symptoms resolve on the gluten free diet

 

edit: no idea why my post is displaying weird.

cyclinglady Grand Master

That's weird! U of Chicago tells doctors to first take a blood test and then take biopsies. How did your doc justify the endo to insurance? He must not suspect celiac disease.

There is still a chance to miss damage on a biopsy. I would think that you would need the blood test to rule out celiac disease as other things can produce Villi damage (per U of C website).

Celtic Queen Explorer

I'm another with a positive blood test and negative biopsy.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



MChase Apprentice

Cyclinglady,

I thought it was odd that he would do an endoscopy before blood tests. When I asked about it, he said he was requesting what blood tests the hospital did. I was in the ER in August for extreme pain. They said diverticulitis. My primary (I've been seeing for 8 years) said it was not that but definitely either Celiac or Ulcerative Colitis, she sent me to the GI with a request for Celiac and IBD testing.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Call your regular doctor in the morning and ask for a slip for the blood work Once the blood is drawn since you already had the endo you can start the diet. You may feel better even before you get the results back. You also may find the gastritis is gluten related and heals once you are gluten free.

SkyBlue4 Apprentice

My GI doctor diagnosed celiac disease based on my bloodwork. He informed me that the outcome of my endoscopy and biopsies would not change the diagnosis but would simply help him assess the extent of the damage. I've heard from several doctors now that it is very easy to miss celiac disease since the scope can only reach the entrance to the small intestines.

answerseeker Enthusiast

My GI doctor diagnosed celiac disease based on my bloodwork. He informed me that the outcome of my endoscopy and biopsies would not change the diagnosis but would simply help him assess the extent of the damage. I've heard from several doctors now that it is very easy to miss celiac disease since the scope can only reach the entrance to the small intestines.

that's what my GI dr told me. it seems maybe they will be changing the way they diagnose since there are so many inconsistencies with biopsies. I went through a lot of negative testing before finally breaking out with DH and was diagnosed based on that. I thought my negative results were from being on prednisone (straight through my IV and through a shot in the hip so it was a lot of prednisone) but after reading these responses I'm thinking biopsies are hard to see the damage. And not to mention if the pathologist isn't trained in celiac they will miss it.

 

this is an interesting thread to see how many have had negative biopsies!

GFinDC Veteran

Hi MChase,

 

It would be better to get the full celiac antibodie panel now.  Even if the biopsy doesn't show celiac disease, your blood antibodies may show it.  The nice things about having the test results for antibodies is you can get them tested again later and verify if they have gone down or not.

 

I think you meant to say no scalloping right?  A scalloped appearance of the small intestine is how they describe the advanced villi damage.  Scalloping doesn't show up for less advanced damage though.  That's why they take the biopsy samples to check them under a microscope.  Any villi damage is a bad thing though.

cyclinglady Grand Master

Cyclinglady,

I thought it was odd that he would do an endoscopy before blood tests. When I asked about it, he said he was requesting what blood tests the hospital did. I was in the ER in August for extreme pain. They said diverticulitis. My primary (I've been seeing for 8 years) said it was not that but definitely either Celiac or Ulcerative Colitis, she sent me to the GI with a request for Celiac and IBD testing.

Maybe he thought the ER ran a Celiac panel,but I doubt it. Get the blood test and then get off gluten! Take copies of testing procedures from reputable sites (e.g. University Hospitals) if you get resistance from him.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,669
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CDR40
    Newest Member
    CDR40
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.