Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

No Scaling = No Celiac

MChase

Recommended Posts

MChase Apprentice
MChase
Posted

I had my colonoscopy and an endoscopy today. The GI dr said my colon is fine. No ulcerative colitis, diverticulitis, or Crohns. He also said that there were no signs of scaling in my small intestine so Celiac is unlikely. He did take 7 biopsies (not sure from which end). He said not to go gluten free just yet.

So the diagnosis now is gastritis. He gave me a prescription for Prilosec 40mg. If I am going out and feel nervous about things, I could take Immodium. No follow up yet. They will calk with biopsy results and make a follow up at that time. Results can take anywhere between 2 days and 2 weeks. All this was relayed to me by my husband because I was still out of it from the anesthia.

I have not had a celiac blood panel yet. When I asked the GI about it at the consult, he said the endoscopy was the gold standard for testing for Celiac. When I asked my primary Dr (when she referred me to the GI), she said the GI dr would do blood tests. My primary was the one who stated she thought I had Celiac.

If my biopsy is negative, should I ask the GI Dr for a Celiac panel or ask my primary dr? 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


answerseeker Enthusiast
answerseeker
Posted

Biopsy is the gold standard. It will show more than blood tests

MChase Apprentice
MChase
Posted
  • Author

Can't one have negative biopsy and still have positive blood tests and be Celiac? I am not sure how many biopsies he took of the small intestine. The nurse said a total of 7 biopsies from both my colonoscopy and egd, but she didn't know how many from what section.

answerseeker Enthusiast
answerseeker
Posted

You could but I think they will still use the biopsy as the diagnostic tool. Others can chime in if they have a different opinion. From my understanding, without damage there won't be antibodies in the blood. However, damage is speradic and could be missed in the biopsy sample which is why they should take 4-7 samples.

Most people have had neg blood work and positive biopsy but I have seen a few with the opposite

shadowicewolf Proficient
shadowicewolf
Posted

Can't one have negative biopsy and still have positive blood tests and be Celiac? I am not sure how many biopsies he took of the small intestine. The nurse said a total of 7 biopsies from both my colonoscopy and egd, but she didn't know how many from what section.

Yes, I am a person who has.

 

The thing with the biopsies is that the doctors can miss damage. Most damage is microscopic.

 

You only need 4 of the 5 dx criteria to be dx'd with celiac according to the leading expert of it.

 

Positive blood test

Positive Biopsy

Positve genetic test

Symptoms related to celiac

Symptoms resolve on the gluten free diet

 

edit: no idea why my post is displaying weird.

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

That's weird! U of Chicago tells doctors to first take a blood test and then take biopsies. How did your doc justify the endo to insurance? He must not suspect celiac disease.

There is still a chance to miss damage on a biopsy. I would think that you would need the blood test to rule out celiac disease as other things can produce Villi damage (per U of C website).

Celtic Queen Explorer
Celtic Queen
Posted

I'm another with a positive blood test and negative biopsy.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


MChase Apprentice
MChase
Posted
  • Author

Cyclinglady,

I thought it was odd that he would do an endoscopy before blood tests. When I asked about it, he said he was requesting what blood tests the hospital did. I was in the ER in August for extreme pain. They said diverticulitis. My primary (I've been seeing for 8 years) said it was not that but definitely either Celiac or Ulcerative Colitis, she sent me to the GI with a request for Celiac and IBD testing.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Call your regular doctor in the morning and ask for a slip for the blood work Once the blood is drawn since you already had the endo you can start the diet. You may feel better even before you get the results back. You also may find the gastritis is gluten related and heals once you are gluten free.

SkyBlue4 Apprentice
SkyBlue4
Posted

My GI doctor diagnosed celiac disease based on my bloodwork. He informed me that the outcome of my endoscopy and biopsies would not change the diagnosis but would simply help him assess the extent of the damage. I've heard from several doctors now that it is very easy to miss celiac disease since the scope can only reach the entrance to the small intestines.

answerseeker Enthusiast
answerseeker
Posted

My GI doctor diagnosed celiac disease based on my bloodwork. He informed me that the outcome of my endoscopy and biopsies would not change the diagnosis but would simply help him assess the extent of the damage. I've heard from several doctors now that it is very easy to miss celiac disease since the scope can only reach the entrance to the small intestines.

that's what my GI dr told me. it seems maybe they will be changing the way they diagnose since there are so many inconsistencies with biopsies. I went through a lot of negative testing before finally breaking out with DH and was diagnosed based on that. I thought my negative results were from being on prednisone (straight through my IV and through a shot in the hip so it was a lot of prednisone) but after reading these responses I'm thinking biopsies are hard to see the damage. And not to mention if the pathologist isn't trained in celiac they will miss it.

 

this is an interesting thread to see how many have had negative biopsies!

GFinDC Veteran
GFinDC
Posted

Hi MChase,

 

It would be better to get the full celiac antibodie panel now.  Even if the biopsy doesn't show celiac disease, your blood antibodies may show it.  The nice things about having the test results for antibodies is you can get them tested again later and verify if they have gone down or not.

 

I think you meant to say no scalloping right?  A scalloped appearance of the small intestine is how they describe the advanced villi damage.  Scalloping doesn't show up for less advanced damage though.  That's why they take the biopsy samples to check them under a microscope.  Any villi damage is a bad thing though.

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

Cyclinglady,

I thought it was odd that he would do an endoscopy before blood tests. When I asked about it, he said he was requesting what blood tests the hospital did. I was in the ER in August for extreme pain. They said diverticulitis. My primary (I've been seeing for 8 years) said it was not that but definitely either Celiac or Ulcerative Colitis, she sent me to the GI with a request for Celiac and IBD testing.

Maybe he thought the ER ran a Celiac panel,but I doubt it. Get the blood test and then get off gluten! Take copies of testing procedures from reputable sites (e.g. University Hospitals) if you get resistance from him.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin. In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began...
    2. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted...
    3. JoJo0611
      - JoJo0611 replied to JoJo0611's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      CT with contrast.

      Thank you.
    4. deanna1ynne
      - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased int...
    5. cristiana
      - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott. Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
      CT with contrast.

      By JoJo0611 · Posted

      Thank you. 
    • deanna1ynne
      Inconclusive results

      By deanna1ynne · Posted

      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      By cristiana · Posted

      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.