Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Test Results Help Please


veryami1

Recommended Posts

veryami1 Apprentice

Hi,

 

I just returned from an appointment with my GI. She said I am negative for celiac, however, the copy of the test results I received said "supports a diagnosis of celiac." I am obviously confused. I went back to ask her why she said it was negative, and she didn't have time for me. Suffice to say, I won't be going back. But I do have these results and I'd like your opinion on how to interpret them.

 

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibody - IgG - 43.0 EU

Deamidated Giagin Peptide Antibody IgA - 9.3 EU

Anti-hunman tissue transglutaminase igA - 75.0 EU

Anti-endomysial igA IFA - positive

total serum iGA by Nephelometry, total igA - 129

 

One ellele HLA DqA1*05 of Dq2.5 detected, HLA DQB81*02 not detected.

Celiac risk haplotype not detected

 

I suspect because I do not test positive for the gene, she said I was negative for celiac? Any opinions? Would really appreciate any help!

 

For some reference, I blood test positive for a wheat allergy and I've been avoiding gluten for almost three weeks because I suspet celiac.

 

thank you!

 

Ami


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GottaSki Mentor

Hi,

 

I just returned from an appointment with my GI. She said I am negative for celiac, however, the copy of the test results I received said "supports a diagnosis of celiac." I am obviously confused. I went back to ask her why she said it was negative, and she didn't have time for me. Suffice to say, I won't be going back. But I do have these results and I'd like your opinion on how to interpret them.

 

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibody - IgG - 43.0 EU

Deamidated Giagin Peptide Antibody IgA - 9.3 EU

Anti-hunman tissue transglutaminase igA - 75.0 EU

Anti-endomysial igA IFA - positive

total serum iGA by Nephelometry, total igA - 129

 

One ellele HLA DqA1*05 of Dq2.5 detected, HLA DQB81*02 not detected.

Celiac risk haplotype not detected

 

I suspect because I do not test positive for the gene, she said I was negative for celiac? Any opinions? Would really appreciate any help!

 

For some reference, I blood test positive for a wheat allergy and I've been avoiding gluten for almost three weeks because I suspet celiac.

 

thank you!

 

Ami

 

Welcome Ami!

 

Looks like your doctor is wrong and you do have Celiac Disease in addition to your wheat allergy - Make sure your primary doc gets copies of all these tests -- unless you want to proceed with an endoscopy, there is no need for a celiac specialist.  If you decide to proceed with an endo -- try to find another GI that has training/experience with Celiac Disease.

 

Do you have the ranges for these tests -- they certainly look like they support a diagnosis of Celiac Disease - especially the positive Anti-Endomysial IgA -- also known as EMA-IgA.

 

Were you already gluten free for a time before these antibody tests were run?

 

Let us know the ranges if you have them.

veryami1 Apprentice

Hi Lisa,

Thanks for the quick reply. These are the ranges listed on the paperwork, in parenthesis.

 

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibody - IgG - 43.0 EU  (<4.9 EU)

Deamidated Giagin Peptide Antibody IgA - 9.3 EU  (<6.1 EU)

Anti-hunman tissue transglutaminase igA - 75.0 EU (<10.3)

Anti-endomysial igA IFA - positive  (range, negative)

total serum iGA by Nephelometry, total igA - 129   (<3 years, 8-220, 3-13 years 41-395, >13, 44-441)

 

I don't know how to interpret any of the above!

 

I've been wheat/gluten free for 3 weeks, on Saturday. At the time of the above blood test, I was about 2 weeks free.

 

What leads you to quickly say that yes, I am celiac positive?

 

Thanks for any help! I found another doctor for a follow up in two weeks, will stay gluten-free regardless of all of this! My allergies seem to be clearing although my stomach issues are roughly the same since starting gluten-free.

 

Ami

cmc811 Apprentice

Every one of your tests was positive. Get a new GI or like Lisa said make sure your PCP has these results.

GottaSki Mentor

Every one of these tests is strong positive, which is what it looked like - but I do like to see ranges because ranges vary between labs.

 

Glad you'll be seeing another doctor soon.

 

It takes time for symptoms to improve gluten-free.  Sometimes it is days, weeks, months and sadly even years....but things do improve.  Healing happens.

 

The tTG-IgA and EMA-IgA both indicate there is damage within your small intestine caused by an autoimmune reaction that your body has to gluten.  This is not an allergy, but a person can be both celiac and allergic to wheat, barley or rye.

 

The  Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP-IgA and IgG) are tests that measure the antibodies your body is producing to one of the peptides in the protein of Gluten - called Gliadin.

 

Hope that make sense.  

 

If there is a chance that you will be having an endoscopic biopsy you will need to continue to consume gluten each day -- it can be very tough to add it back in, so talk to the new doctor about your options.

 

Here is a great thread for those newly diagnosed and those new to living gluten-free:

 

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/91878-newbie-info-101/

 

Hang in there :)

veryami1 Apprentice

Thank you all SO much! What do the allelle results mean?

 

Do you think that she interpreted the results as negative simply because I did not test positive for both genes? How can she be so stupid, to put it not so mildly?

 

With these results, is there ANY WAY I can not have celiacs, not taking into account possible testing errors or such?

 

Looking forward to getting to know everyone here more, since I think I'll be staying around :)

 

Ami

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,669
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CDR40
    Newest Member
    CDR40
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.