Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

The "i'm Not Celiac, Therefore I Don't Have To Be As Careful" Reasoning


BlessedMommy

Recommended Posts

BlessedMommy Rising Star

I've noticed something and it's that people have a tendency to proclaim that they're not celiac and then give a follow up line about not being as careful on the gluten-free diet.

 

My thoughts are as follows:

 

1) Really? How do you know that you're not celiac? If a person went on the gluten free diet without bloodwork, then they definitely haven't ruled out celiac.

 

Those who have been blood tested could've gotten a false negative. Even if they did a biopsy, they could've missed the section of your intestine that has it.

 

2) How do you scientifically know that doing a lax version of the gluten-free diet won't hurt you?

 

I just am not sure why people go around proclaiming 2 different sets of rules for celiac and non-celiac gluten free diets. Rhetorical question: Is there any scientific information proving that purposefully cross contaminating myself is a good idea? 

 

This came from a conversation that I overheard at the health food store. The employee was advising a gluten intolerant person about oats and though I didn't hear the whole conversation, it sounded like she may have been encouraging the person that eating non certified oats was fine, because "you're not celiac."

 

I started chatting with the lady while standing in line and as it turns out, although she's supposedly not celiac, she is pretty much bedridden and violently ill if she gets any gluten.

 

I advised her that even if the celiac tests don't show celiac, it doesn't mean that she's not.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



LauraTX Rising Star

Woe to anyone who trusts a non-expert store clerk with health advice.

nvsmom Community Regular

Woe to anyone who trusts a non-expert store clerk with health advice.

 

LOL :D

 

I'm normally not a huge fan of about.com, but in Open Original Shared Link she quotes Dr Fasano (celiac expert) as saying:

In gluten sensitivity, the innate immune system -- an older part of the immune system and the body's first line of defense against invaders -- responds to gluten ingestion by fighting the gluten directly. That creates inflammation both inside and outside the digestive system, according to Dr. Fasano.

Inflammation is nasty. It messes with your whole system and can nudge you right along into heart disease and diabetes. That's a good reason for those with NCGS o avoid gluten right there.

 

On page 2 she discusses diagnosing a celiac based on the biopsy.  Marsh  III is celiac disease, but Marsh I and II are NCGS (non-celiac gluten sensitivity) but some who continued on a gluten filled diet went on to "develop" celiac disease when they graduated to Marsh III.   :blink:  But they weren't celiac disease to begin with...False negatives are possible.  They aren't the majority by any means, but they do happen.

124chicksinger Apprentice

This interests me because I have a "no celiac" diagnosis by blood work and biopsy (tho I think he didn't take enough samples) and the blood test could be false negative.  I showed inflammation in the entire upper scope, and he took biopsies of my esophagus and stomach too. Pathology for whatever he requested was all negative.  But, I stopped eating gluten anyhow, the day before the scopes (both ends).  And when I asked what caused the inflammation, he had no answer other than -- gerd/heartburn - which neither was really an issue for me (unless very occasional only heartburn could cause such inflammation).

 

I have not thrown out my toaster, and I have toasted a piece of gluten-free cornbread in it and ate that without repercussion.  Nor my pots, which i do use to cook for the entire family.  Am I careful at home to not cross-contaminate?  Yes, but, having "you're not celiac" diagnosis, I assume a crumb on the counter, if it came into contact with something else I put in my mouth, cannot damage my small intestine, and perhaps would not cause a reaction at all - but I don't know that for sure.  I do know that eating out on Sunday gave me 3 trips to the toilet, 2 of them urgent/explosive, so cause/effect was definitely occurring - I don't think it was coincidence - even tho I ate what I believed to be gluten-free choices.  Meanwhile, I have eaten an omelet from a place down the street that likely was cooked on a griddle where pancakes were cooked prior, without incident.

 

Do I think it would be okay for me to have a piece of ---- pizza?  No.  Nor cake, nor toast, etc.  I do believe a few pieces of regular macaroni would likely cause me intestinal distress, and therefore, I have lost my desire to eat it.  All in all, I think I probably do not have to be as careful as a diagnosed celiac, but I really don't know.

 

I had planned in a few months to test the waters and eat something really doughy and wheaty and sure to be the culprit IF it made me sick, but honest and truly, I have no desire for such food, so I don't know how/when I'll test myself.  And, when I do, if I don't react---then what has this gluten-free path been about?  

GottaSki Mentor
 

 And, when I do, if I don't react---then what has this gluten-free path been about?  

 

 

That you found improved health gluten-free?

 

If you really are gluten intolerant or have early celiac....you will know it when/if you decide to return to eating gluten.

 

In my opinion, you are ahead of the game simply because you are connecting the food you consume to your health.

 

:)

GottaSki Mentor

 

I advised her that even if the celiac tests don't show celiac, it doesn't mean that she's not.

 

For me...I would not have this conversation in the grocery check out line -- simply because there is no way to know in a brief conversation the medical history/testing of this individual.

 

I do, however, regularly engage in conversations in the grocery isles when I find people in obvious distress reading ingredient labels ;)

FruitEnthusiast Enthusiast

The way I look at it, whether Celiac or NCGI, it's never a good idea to mess around with anything regarding our immune systems or inflammation. Our bodies have given us a warning sign. Gluten and intolerances in general aren't something to be taken lightly. That ball can get rolling until it's big enough to crush your life, like it has mine for the time being. I won't ever take good health for granted again, after fighting with everything I have to get back in the game... and I will get there :)  When I do I won't let anything happen to get stuck on the bench again.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      46

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    2. - trents replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Is it gluten?

    3. - RMJ replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      nothing has changed

    4. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      nothing has changed

    5. - nanny marley replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      You may also need to supplement with B12 as this vitamin is also involved in iron assimilation and is often deficient in long-term undiagnosed celiac disease.
    • trents
      @par18, no, Scott's use of the term "false negative" is intentional and appropriate. The "total IGA" test is not a test used to diagnose celiac disease per se. The IGA immune spectrum response encompasses more than just celiac disease. So, "total IGA" refers to the whole pie, not just the celiac response part of it. But if the whole pie is deficient, the spectrum of components making it up will likely be also, including the celiac disease response spectrum. In other words, IGA deficiency may produce a tTG-IGA score that is negative that might have been positive had there not been IGA deficiency. So, the tTG-IGA negative score may be "false", i.e, inaccurate, aka, not to be trusted.
    • RMJ
      This may be the problem. Every time you eat gluten it is like giving a booster shot to your immune system, telling it to react and produce antibodies again.
    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
    • nanny marley
      I have had a long year of testing unfortunately still not diagnosed , although one thing they definitely agree I'm gluten intolerant, the thing for me I have severe back troubles they wouldnt perform the tests and I couldn't have a full MRI because I'm allergic to the solution , we tryed believe me  I tryed lol , another was to have another blood test after consuming gluten but it makes me so bad I tryed it for only a week, and because I have a trapped sciatic nerve when I get bad bowels it sets that off terribly so I just take it on myself now , I eat a gluten free diet , I'm the best I've ever been , and if I slip I know it so for me i have my own diagnosis  and I act accordingly, sometimes it's not so straight forward for some of us , for the first time in years I can plan to go out , and I have been absorbing my food better , running to the toilet has become occasionally now instead of all the time , i hope you find a solution 🤗
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.