Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ttg And In Denial? Can You Tell Me Your Number?


afitgirl

Recommended Posts

afitgirl Rookie

I have looked everywhere for this.   I'm new, scared and trying to understand whatever I can.   It seems that this TTG thing is the most important in the blood screening?  Why can't I find  random numbers of people?   I want to compare and find where I fit in?  Or is that denial?  I was a 17.   I want to see 35, 100, 11, etc.   The lower the score the better.....is a 17 say....not so bad??   I'm grasping at anything I can here.  


 
 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

What is the range for the test you took?  Different labs use a different measurement.  Sort of like measuring in inches or centimeters.  

afitgirl Rookie

What is the range for the test you took?  Different labs use a different measurement.  Sort of like measuring in inches or centimeters.  

0-3- neg

4-10 weak pos

10+ pos

But I'm wondering if 17 really isn't that high....Perhaps people have....400?

kareng Grand Master

0-3- neg

4-10 weak pos

10+ pos

But I'm wondering if 17 really isn't that high....Perhaps people have....400?

 

 

I don't think it measures that high (400)usually.  It really doesn't matter what my tests were for your circumstances.

 

Look - time to face it - your test was positive.  Have you had an endoscopy?  That is probably the best way to find out the extent of the damage.  It really doesn't matter if you are at the beginning of Celiac or have had it, untreated for 10 years, the treatment is the same.  You aren't " a little bit Celiac".  

LauraTX Rising Star

Usually when I see a positive result mentioned it is a more modest number like yours, although I have seen some that were very high, 100+.  However, like Karen said, it does not indicate how likely you may be to have Celiac, a positive is a positive no matter where it is on the scale, and you need to go ahead and have an endoscopy done for proper screening. If you want a measure of severity or damage, the endoscopy is going to tell you the most information. 

 

I have an IGA deficiency so my number would not be good to compare to someone with a normal immune system.  I totally understand you trying to rationalize things, that is very natural when you are faced with a scary diagnosis.  Let us know what happens.

RMJ Mentor

With negative being 0-3, I was a 76 for TTG IgA.

afitgirl Rookie

Thank you!! 

Kareng- I didn't know that.  I am so new that I truly believed that you could be a little celiac.   I thought perhaps my body was "tougher" maybe since my symptoms seem to be more silent (but apparently deadly :( )   I see my doctor Thursday after just hearing this results Friday.  I'm having a hard time.   Really hard time adjusting.   I know you are right and it's time to face it.  But I'm sure many people go through a denial point? I thought maybe I could be at such a early stage that it was more of an indication of my future in time and not my path yet.   Like...maybe I wouldn't really develop it for 10 more years and I had more time to take go all my kids favorite food places with them. 

 

Laura- Thank you for you input.  You told me what I needed to know.  Very kind.  I'm just...scared of this life.

RMJ- Thank you too!  I was hoping to hear a number like that.   It made me wonder if my biopsy wouldn't show much damage...perhaps I'm at a risk but not full blown celiacs yet?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

Yep, you are quite positive - about 4 times the upper normal limit of less than 4... definitely no grey area there.  :(  Even if your numbers were lower, you should know that we have celiacs around here who had a completely normal tTG IgA but extensive intestinal damage, and there are some with very high numbers who had very little intestinal damage.

 

I think of it like a pregnancy test - some people's double lines are faint and others are dark but they both mean the same thing.  ;)

 

Just because you asked, my tTG IgA was 200+ but my labs upper limit for normal was 20. 

 

Oh, and you need to get your kids checked too. :(  Celiac has a genetic component so your kids are at risk of developing it. They should be tested every 2-3 years if they continue to eat gluten even if they have no symptoms at all.

 

Best wishes while you adjust to the diet.  It is hard to accept at first, but after a few months it will be much much easier.  Promise.

  • 1 month later...
SMRI Collaborator

I was tested at 32.4.  I know my niece was 128 and had no symptoms.  I mainly have D but now that I'm reducing my gluten in prep of going gluten-free, having too much gluten has brought back some major gas that I had before but just thought it was what it was.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,073
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ImVenus
    Newest Member
    ImVenus
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
    • Scott Adams
      BTW, we've done other articles on this topic that I wanted to share here (not to condone smoking!):    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.