Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Contamination Anxiety- Help!


afitgirl

Recommended Posts

beth01 Enthusiast

I have a feeling that those that think you don't need to be "anal" about cross contamination are the ones that haven't been sick their whole lives and haven't had to wait for a diagnosis and don't have tons of other medical issues that have stemmed from undiagnosed celiac. When you live your whole life like that, you welcome any change no matter how drastic is seems.

 

I frankly have been very anal about cross contamination.  I am sick of the brain fog, sick of the stomach aches, sick of the joint pain, sick of the muscle aches, sick of the nerve damage that affects my whole body from head to toe.  But I guess if you haven't had to live with all that, having a few beers and some soy sauce is nothing. I myself would rather stick a hot needle in my eye than eat one crumb of gluten, as I sit here looking like I am 24 months pregnant from all the bloating and D of getting CC'd by my boyfriend forgetting to brush his teeth ( he feels just awful, if I hear " I'm sorry" one more time....) and not looking forward to the next seven days or more.  Took me 7 days to recover from the last glutening, hopefully this one won't take as long.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Redbard52 Newbie

beth01:

 

I am sorry to hear that you have had so many issues with gluten.  I fully support your right to be "anal" about gluten.

 

(FYI, you are right in that I was only diagnosed 2 years ago, so my time dealing with celiac disease has been relatively short.)

 

I am only advocating my approach for those that are not extremely sensitive and find that trace amounts of gluten do not impact their daily life.  They do still need to monitor their consumption of items that potentially contain gluten - even at 20 ppm, too much quantity can reach damaging levels.

 

Redbeard52

kareng Grand Master

I don't think the study or the quote below were meant to mean that you should go out and consume gluten up to a certain level on purpose.  I think it was meant to re-assure people that a tiny inadvertent amount won't bother most Celiacs.  Because we might be getting a tiny amount at any time, we shouldn't go out looking for trouble by consuming things with known gluten - like a beer or a wheat based soy sauce.  

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

Is it possible to completely eliminate gluten from my diet?

Celiacs must be aware that trace amounts of gluten (remaining gluten residual, cross-contamination, gluten in naturally gluten-free products) will be practically impossible to avoid. A safe limit of intake for most celiacs is less than 100mg per day, though some do react with as little as 10mg.

 

 

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

 

 

A lifetime commitment

The gluten-free diet is a lifetime requirement. Eating any gluten, no matter how small an amount, can damage your intestine. This is true for anyone with the disease, including people who do not have noticeable symptoms.

notme Experienced

I fully support your right to be "anal" about gluten.

hello, friend.  you seem to be obsessed with the buttholious. <_<

 

there are people on here who will get really sick from drinking regular beer and soy sauce made of wheat.  if you are too weak or unwise enough to resist these things, please do not try to encourage others to engage in things that will hurt them.  i am thinking that since you are still ingesting gluten regularly that you haven't experienced the clarity of mind that comes with a celiac completely removing gluten from their diet.  maybe you should try it :)

Redbard52 Newbie

notme!:  My references to "anal" used the same language as the original posters - I was only using the language they had initiated.  And I have repeatedly stated that people that react with symptoms to minute amounts of gluten should not do what I do.

 

I have been told that I cannot suggest that anyone can intentionally ingest even trace amounts of gluten on this forum (even though it is not explicitly stated in the Board Rules Policy).  But I can post legitimate research.  Please refer to the following research paper:

 

"A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to establish a safe gluten threshold for patients with celiac disease.
Open Original Shared Link1Open Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared Link,Open Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared Link.
Open Original Shared Link
  • 1Center For Celiac Research, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

Conclusions: The ingestion of contaminating gluten should be kept lower than 50 mg/d in the treatment of celiac disease.

Comment in
  • Open Original Shared Link [Am J Clin Nutr. 2007]"

 

 

This paper concludes that 50 mg of gluten can damage your intestines but 20 mg of gluten did not show damage in the research.  (Note that the participants ingested gluten intentionally as part of the research project.)  Draw your own conclusions.

 

Redbeard52 

notme Experienced

This paper concludes that 50 mg of gluten can damage your intestines but 20 mg of gluten did not show damage in the research.  (Note that the participants ingested gluten intentionally as part of the research project.)  Draw your own conclusions.

 

Redbeard52 

it also says some had a relapse....  :(  

 

to argue over 20 mg of gluten is kind of hey have one bite of pizza?  i guess whatever floats your boat - it wasn't a long term study, right.  so, that's what you are:  a living, long term study?   report back in 10 years, i suppose.  you must have been diagnosed for a reason.

beth01 Enthusiast

What most of us don't understand is that a diagnosed celiac would intentionally ingest gluten.  Would you intentionally ingest poison?  That is what the vast majority of us don't understand.  I spent 37 years of my life sick with no known cause from the doctors until three months ago.  I have so many unresolved health problems stemming from misdiagnosis for 37 years, and I am not the only one. Some of those symptoms may never go away and they happen to be damn painful.  This is a diagnosis for life, until and if they come up with something that will block the autoimmune response that happens when we ingest gluten. Some patients may be more tolerant of trace amounts of gluten, but no medical doctor in their right mind is going to suggest going for it even if you don't have a response. You should not be ingesting gluten no matter what, if you react to it or not.  It's common sense.

 

That's my story and I'm sticking to it! 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

notme!:  My references to "anal" used the same language as the original posters - I was only using the language they had initiated.  And I have repeatedly stated that people that react with symptoms to minute amounts of gluten should not do what I do.

 

I have been told that I cannot suggest that anyone can intentionally ingest even trace amounts of gluten on this forum (even though it is not explicitly stated in the Board Rules Policy).  But I can post legitimate research.  Please refer to the following research paper:

 

"A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to establish a safe gluten threshold for patients with celiac disease.
Open Original Shared Link1Open Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared Link,Open Original Shared LinkOpen Original Shared Link.
Open Original Shared Link
  • 1Center For Celiac Research, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

Conclusions: The ingestion of contaminating gluten should be kept lower than 50 mg/d in the treatment of celiac disease.

Comment in
  • Open Original Shared Link [Am J Clin Nutr. 2007]"

 

 

This paper concludes that 50 mg of gluten can damage your intestines but 20 mg of gluten did not show damage in the research.  (Note that the participants ingested gluten intentionally as part of the research project.)  Draw your own conclusions.

 

Redbeard52 

 

 

 

If your follow-up tests are all negative, I guess you are doing OK.  

 

Like I said before, that test wasn't done to say "Hey Celiacs!  You can cheat everyday."  I think it was one of the ones done to try to see if a 20ppm standard would be safe for most Celiacs.  When I heard them talk about that study, they never once suggested it was so people could cheat on their diet.  

 

There are issues with tests for gluten in beer, so I don't think we can really know how much gluten are in them from the barley at this point.

Redbard52 Newbie

I am just reporting what works for me - as I said, draw your own conclusions.  I do not eat food known to contain more than 20 ppm gluten.

 

notme!: a bite of "normal" pizza would likely be more than 20 mg of gluten!!  I make my own gluten free pizza.

 

beth01:  I regularly and intentionally ingest poison - drinking water, food from the grocery store, etc.  Food is rarely "pure and clean".  Ask your local water department what trace amounts of various chemicals they allow.

notme Experienced

 

This paper concludes that 50 mg of gluten can damage your intestines but 20 mg of gluten did not show damage in the research.  (Note that the participants ingested gluten intentionally as part of the research project.)  Draw your own conclusions.

 

Redbeard52 

quoting you, dude.  ok, so, not even enough gluten to be semi-enjoyable.   so, the point is..........?

beth01 Enthusiast

glutendude.com/alcohol/is-corona-gluten-free

 

This guy know his stuff.  Has very valid points. Like many of the gals said along with glutendude, you say it's safe even though you don't know for a fact it is, someone reads only your post when doing a search, they then think it's safe ( hey, this dude on celiac.com said it was), then others follow. All from one piece of bad information. Like Karen said, testing for gluten in beer is not an exact science, it's very controversial.

LauraTX Rising Star

Open Original Shared Link

 

There is a clickable link for the less tech savvy of our readers.  It is a good read.  Thanks for pointing us to it, Beth!

Redbard52 Newbie

So "glutendude" is considered to be a "legitimate source"??  Ramblings about gluten testing of beer without any new facts?

 

I would guess that many people on this forum with celiac disease eat foods labeled "Gluten Free".  So here is my rambling...

 

 

I have celiac disease, so I eat foods labeled "Gluten Free".

 

But Gluten Free only means "less than 20 ppm gluten".

 

So I may be ingesting 19 ppm gluten!

 

But the FDA says it is safe for me to eat foods with 20 ppm gluten?

 

But others tell me that I should not consume "any" gluten.

 

I'm so confused!!

 

:)

 

Redbeard52

kareng Grand Master

So "glutendude" is considered to be a "legitimate source"??  Ramblings about gluten testing of beer without any new facts?

 

I would guess that many people on this forum with celiac disease eat foods labeled "Gluten Free".  So here is my rambling...

 

 

I have celiac disease, so I eat foods labeled "Gluten Free".

 

But Gluten Free only means "less than 20 ppm gluten".

 

So I may be ingesting 19 ppm gluten!

 

But the FDA says it is safe for me to eat foods with 20 ppm gluten?

 

But others tell me that I should not consume "any" gluten.

 

I'm so confused!!

 

:)

 

Redbeard52

 

 

This seems like deja vu.  Seems like we have had these same comments before.....   B)

 

Eating gluten-free and accidental gluten are not the same as telling people they can eat things with gluten just because it didn't bother you.  

GottaSki Mentor

Corona may have less gluten...but still has gluten...nothing scientific, but I was not diagnosed until age 43 by which time I had had a few beers in my life.

 

I never liked any beer -- made me bloat like crazy -- interestingly when camping in baja during my late teens and twenties...we only drank real Corona...the stuff you bought next to the water stores in Baja...at that age when presented with buying drinking water or beer for nearly the same price, well you get the idea -- we all survived on cases of corona or tecate rather than buying bottled water while camping in Mexico.

 

Here is the interesting part -- when back in the states I'd order Corona or Pacifico and bloat -- different manufacturing plant -- different reaction.

 

As I said, nothing scientific about it since I didn't learn the words Celiac or Gluten until a couple of decades later ;)

 

If you are diagnosed with Celiac Disease...it is simple.  Avoid all gluten, regardless of reaction.

Redbard52 Newbie

I agree with kareng: it seems that I keep seeing the same comments as before.  I will not respond any more to comments that say little more than "your'e wrong, we're right" unless accompanied by legitimate factual sources.

 

Let's return this thread to the questions raised by Afitgirl, which is what I was originally responding to.

GottaSki Mentor

I agree with kareng: it seems that I keep seeing the same comments as before.  I will not respond any more to comments that say little more than "your'e wrong, we're right" unless accompanied by legitimate factual sources.

 

Let's return this thread to the questions raised by Afitgirl, which is what I was originally responding to.

 

That is a great idea :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    2. - JudyLou posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    3. - marzian commented on Scott Adams's article in Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment
      5

      A Future Beyond the Gluten-Free Diet? Scientists Test a New Cell Therapy for Celiac Disease (+Video)

    4. - Jmartes71 posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      0

      Medications

    5. - Scott Adams replied to GlutenFreeChef's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Blood Test for Celiac wheat type matters?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,141
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    islaPorty
    Newest Member
    islaPorty
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @JudyLou! There are a couple of things you might consider to help you in your decision that would not require you to do a gluten challenge. The first, that is if you have not had this test run already, is to request a "total IGA" test to be run. One of the reasons that celiac blood antibody tests can be negative, apart from not having celiac disease, that is, is because of IGA deficiency. If a person is IGA deficient, they will not respond accurately to the celiac disease blood antibody tests (such as the commonly run TTG-IGA). The total IGA test is designed to check for IGA deficiency. The total IGA test is not a celiac antibody test so I wouldn't think that a gluten challenge is necessary. The second is to have genetic testing done to determine if you have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease. About 30-40% of  the general population have the genetic potential but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to rule it out. Those who don't have the genetic potential but still have reaction to gluten would not be diagnosed with celiac disease but with NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).  Another possibility is that you do have celiac disease but are in remission. We do see this but often it doesn't last.
    • JudyLou
      Hi there, I’m debating whether to consider a gluten challenge and I’m hoping someone here can help with that decision (so far, none of the doctors have been helpful). I have a history of breaking out in a horrible, burning/itchy somewhat blistering rash about every 8 years. This started when I was in my early 30’s and at that point it started at the ankles and went about to my knees. Every time I had the rash it would cover more of my body, so my arms and part of my torso were impacted as well, and it was always symmetrical. First I was told it was an allergic reaction to a bug bite. Next I was told it was eczema (after a biopsy of the lesion - not the skin near the lesion) and given a steroid injection (didn’t help). I took myself off of gluten about 3 weeks before seeing an allergist, just to see if it would help (it didn’t in that time period). He thought the rash looked like dermatitis herpetiformis and told me to eat some bread the night before my blood tests, which I did, and the tests came back negative. I’ve since learned from this forum that I needed to be eating gluten daily for at least a month in order to get an accurate test result. I’m grateful to the allergist as he found that 5 mg of doxepin daily will eliminate the rash within about 10 days (previously it lasted for months whether I was eating gluten or not). I have been gluten free for about 25 years as a precaution and recommendation from my doctor, and the pattern of breaking out every 8 years or so remains the same except once I broke out after just one year (was not glutened as far as I know), and now it’s been over 9 years. What’s confusing to me, is that there have been 3 times in the past 2 years when I’ve accidentally eaten gluten, and I haven’t had any reaction at all. Once someone made pancakes (they said they were gluten-free, they were not) and I ate several. I need to decide whether to do a gluten challenge and get another blood test. If I do, are these tests really accurate? I’m also concerned that I could damage my gut in that process if I do have celiac disease. My brother and cousin both had lymphoma so that’s a concern regarding a challenge as well, though there is a lot of cancer in various forms in my family so there may be no gluten connection there. Sorry for the ramble, I’m just doubting the need to remain gluten free if I don’t have any reaction to eating it and haven’t had a positive test (other than testing positive for one of the genes, though it sounds like that’s pretty common). I’d appreciate any thoughts or advice! 
    • Jmartes71
      Hello, just popped in my head to ask this question about medications and celiac? I have always had refurse reaction to meds since I can remember  of what little meds my body is able to tolerate. I was taking gabapentin 300mg for a week,  in past I believe 150? Any ways it amps me up not able to sleep, though very tired.However I did notice it helped with my bloating sibo belly.I hate that my body is that sensitive and medical doesn't seem to take seriously. Im STILL healing with my skin, eye, and now ms or meningioma ( will know in April  which)and dealing with this limbo nightmare. I did write my name, address ect on the reclamation but im not tech savvy and not sure if went through properly. I called my city representative in Stanislaus County and asked if theres a physical paper i can sign for proclamation for celiac and she had no clue about what I was saying, so I just said I'll go back on website. 
    • Scott Adams
      I'm not saying that some celiacs won't need it, but it should be done under a doctor's supervision because it can cause lots of problems in some people.
    • Jmartes71
      I also noticed I get debilitating migraines when I smell gluten, wheat and its not taken seriously when it affects one in every way.Im still begging to properly be heard.I also noticed tolerance level is down the drain with age and life changes. I have been told by incompetent medical that im not celiac or that sensitive. Diagnosed in 1994 by gi biopsy gluten-free ever since along with other lovely food allergies. Prayers
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.