Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ttg Iga 14 - Not That High?


hazelnutty42

Recommended Posts

hazelnutty42 Rookie

I'm new here and have been reading through posts trying to find answers but didn't see anything about this specifically. I've had GI issues for a few years and finally had blood tests done and my TTG IgA was 14. I know that anything greater than 10 is positive but seems like most people here have numbers WAY higher (100+).  I have an biopsy and colonoscopy scheduled and my GI doc said there isn't much to say until he sees those results. He said 14 is technically celiac but he's "not convinced". Whatever that means. So is 14 just a little high? Not a big deal? Would love any feedback. Thanks! 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GottaSki Mentor

I'm new here and have been reading through posts trying to find answers but didn't see anything about this specifically. I've had GI issues for a few years and finally had blood tests done and my TTG IgA was 14. I know that anything greater than 10 is positive but seems like most people here have numbers WAY higher (100+).  I have an biopsy and colonoscopy scheduled and my GI doc said there isn't much to say until he sees those results. He said 14 is technically celiac but he's "not convinced". Whatever that means. So is 14 just a little high? Not a big deal? Would love any feedback. Thanks! 

 

Positive is positive.  One need not have extremely high numbers on any of the celiac antibody tests to have celiac disease.  There are a few reasons other than Celiac Disease that raise the tTG, but with digestive issues and positive antibody test it certainly sounds like celiac.

 

Did this doctor run a complete celiac antibody panel or just the tTG?

 

Here is a complete panel:

 

Total Serum IgA

tTG - both IgA and IgG

DGP - both IgA and IgG

EMA - IgA

 

As an example...all of my celiac antibodies were positive, but most were only "weak" positive, yet I had complete villious atrophy - all samples.

 

Keep eating gluten until the endoscopy and do make sure your doctor is planning to take 6-8 samples from the small intestine.

 

Welcome to the forum!

SMRI Collaborator

It's kind of like being pregnant--either you are or you are not :D

BlessedMommy Rising Star

^I was just about to say the same thing! :)

 

My pregnancy test with my oldest was a very "weak positive" but I was just as pregnant! 

nvsmom Community Regular

Welcome to the board.  :)

 

You are 40% over and above the normal range... doesn't seem that weak to me.  ;)  Yes, some of us had really high tests, but many did not - that's part of the reason this forum is so popular is because the testing can be soooo confusing.  There are also those out there who had completely negative blood tests but a positive biopsy.  And then there is the reverse where you get a negative biopsy but positive labs....

 

I very rarely see someone whose lab results all scream "Celiac!"  It's definitely the minority. LOL

SMRI Collaborator

Welcome to the board.   :)

 

You are 40% over and above the normal range... doesn't seem that weak to me.   ;)  Yes, some of us had really high tests, but many did not - that's part of the reason this forum is so popular is because the testing can be soooo confusing.  There are also those out there who had completely negative blood tests but a positive biopsy.  And then there is the reverse where you get a negative biopsy but positive labs....

 

I very rarely see someone whose lab results all scream "Celiac!"  It's definitely the minority. LOL

 

I think I am one of the few here that tested positive for every test, the IGA, IGG, genes, biopsy, etc.  I would also say that I am one of the least symptomatic people here too....so you just never know. :D.  I was being tested for other things and my dr tossed in the Celiac testing.  My only real symptom was D.  I had other symptoms that I didn't know where related until they went away or started getting better without gluten--brain fog especially--but since most of my friends report the same in perimenopause-I just attributed it to that.

hazelnutty42 Rookie

Thank you everyone. These are the blood tests that I know where done:

 

Celiac AB:

Deamidated Gliadin IgA--?

TTG IgA --14

Serum IgA Quantitation--?

 

I wasn't told any answers except TTG IgA . My primary doc was the one to call me and say the "gluten test was abnormal and you'll need to follow a gluten free diet". Then at my GI appt yesterday that doc didn't even mention the abnormal test until I asked him. He was only going to do a colonoscopy to check for colitis but I asked him what that test result was my other doctor was talking about. That made him go back to look - like he hadn't before! - and said the TTG IgA was 14 and so he would do a biopsy as well. He still wasn't convinced. My liver, etc were fine. I just wonder what he's not convinced about. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SMRI Collaborator

Thank you everyone. These are the blood tests that I know where done:

 

Celiac AB:

Deamidated Gliadin IgA--?

TTG IgA --14

Serum IgA Quantitation--?

 

I wasn't told any answers except TTG IgA . My primary doc was the one to call me and say the "gluten test was abnormal and you'll need to follow a gluten free diet". Then at my GI appt yesterday that doc didn't even mention the abnormal test until I asked him. He was only going to do a colonoscopy to check for colitis but I asked him what that test result was my other doctor was talking about. That made him go back to look - like he hadn't before! - and said the TTG IgA was 14 and so he would do a biopsy as well. He still wasn't convinced. My liver, etc were fine. I just wonder what he's not convinced about. 

 

Without knowing the range the lab used, it's hard to say if it's "normal" or not.  My lab would have called you a weak positive and then referred you for further testing because lab errors could account for the 14 vs 10 or less that would signal a negative.  I would guess, given the GI's reaction, that your other tests were in normal ranges??  I would call the first dr and request a copy of the complete test results--or, if you have online access, they should be there.  My numbers were not 100+ high but my TTG IgA was 32, my TTG IgG was in the 65 range.  For my lab, anything over 20 was a definite positive but they still did the scope and biopsy for a baseline look and the gene testing.

cyclinglady Grand Master

My test results were "mildly positive" but the biopsy showed moderate to severe damage (Marsh Stage IIIB). My only symptom at the time was anemia and since I already had a genetic anemia and I was going through perimenopause (heavy periods), my doctors did not catch it. Only during a GI consult for a routine colonoscopy was my celiac disease caught (I seriously think my GI doc must have just attended a conference or recently read a paper about celiac diease.)

What was really shocking (and put me into denial), was the fact my husband had been gluten-free for 12 years. He went gluten-free per the advice of my allergist and his GP. Sinus infections, snoring, fatigue, body aches? Give up gluten. It worked!!!!!! We really would have like a formal diagnosis though!

GottaSki Mentor

Thank you everyone. These are the blood tests that I know where done:

Celiac AB:

Deamidated Gliadin IgA--?

TTG IgA --14

Serum IgA Quantitation--?

I wasn't told any answers except TTG IgA . My primary doc was the one to call me and say the "gluten test was abnormal and you'll need to follow a gluten free diet". Then at my GI appt yesterday that doc didn't even mention the abnormal test until I asked him. He was only going to do a colonoscopy to check for colitis but I asked him what that test result was my other doctor was talking about. That made him go back to look - like he hadn't before! - and said the TTG IgA was 14 and so he would do a biopsy as well. He still wasn't convinced. My liver, etc were fine. I just wonder what he's not convinced about.

Unfortunately not all gastroenterologists are well educated with regard to celiac disease. We should not have to convince our doctors...sadly it happens far too often.

Just a suggestion, but I would check if there are any celiac savvy GIs near you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,439
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.