Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Annoyed - "modern Bread Rising Methods Cause Gluten Issues"


JodyM75

Recommended Posts

JodyM75 Apprentice

So, I was just at a family gathering and got an earfull, and I was wondering if anyone else had heard this one before.

 

I got into a conversation with a cousin (2nd cousin or so) about having celiac.  He told me one of his sons also can't have gluten, although he didn't say if it was celiac, allergy, etc. 

 

He then told me his theory that the modern way they make bread rise - by using chemicals rather than yeast - is part of the cause behind so many gluten issues today.  I mean, (he said), there has to be a connection, right?  They used to use yeast, they don't anymore, and now more and more people have problems with gluten.

 

I know this is bunk, but I was wondering if anyone had heard this theory before. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Bunk. Commercial bakers still use yeast to make bread rise. There are lots of additives added, but those are added to lots of processed foods to yield better, more palatable results, not to mention a longer shelf life.

Autoimmune diseases seems to be on the rise, but is it environmental or just a case of being able to identify disease better? In the "olden" days, Aunt Heddy died of a "wasting disease" which could have been attributed to a number of diseases. Who knows? Scientists have many theories but few have been proven.

notme Experienced

In the "olden" days, Aunt Heddy died of a "wasting disease" which could have been attributed to a number of diseases. 

right??!!  what did 'the consumption' ever turn out to be?   <_<

kareng Grand Master

There is some thought that modern bread has a higher gluten content.  They add extra of the "gluten" component of wheat to the flour for higher rising, spongyer bread.  The wheat isn't higher gluten - the flour mixture is.  It can still be labelled as "flour" because that is what it is.  (a bit like why 2 different corn flakes could have more sugar and the same ingredient list - one has more sugar).

SMRI Collaborator

right??!!  what did 'the consumption' ever turn out to be?   <_<

tuberculosis

 

I agree-I think better diagnosis is the root behind the "increase".  Like most diseases and conditions, often in the past it went undiagnosed or lumped into a general category.  Also keep in mind that people didn't live as long so many diseases/conditions just didn't appear or were not as severe as to be noticed.  100 years ago I probably wouldn't have been diagnosed with Celiac because I probably would have been dead before my symptoms became bothersome.

JodyM75 Apprentice

I agree-I think better diagnosis is the root behind the "increase".  Like most diseases and conditions, often in the past it went undiagnosed or lumped into a general category.  Also keep in mind that people didn't live as long so many diseases/conditions just didn't appear or were not as severe as to be noticed.  100 years ago I probably wouldn't have been diagnosed with Celiac because I probably would have been dead before my symptoms became bothersome.

 

I agree about the increase and the longer life span, too.  I also think women are more likely to be diagnosed with AI diseases because...women go to the doctor more? 

 

I didn't know that about modern bread flours having more gluten in them, that's interesting.  I did know modern bakers still use yeast (that was the main thing that told me this guy didn't know what he was talking about).

cyclinglady Grand Master

There is some thought that modern bread has a higher gluten content.  They add extra of the "gluten" component of wheat to the flour for higher rising, spongyer bread.  The wheat isn't higher gluten - the flour mixture is.  It can still be labelled as "flour" because that is what it is.  (a bit like why 2 different corn flakes could have more sugar and the same ingredient list - one has more sugar).

Karen is right. I forgot that I is used to add more gluten to my bread. Later, I gave it up because I realized that my grandma never needed it and my results were always good without the additive.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

Karen is right. I forgot that I is used to add more gluten to my bread. Later, I gave it up because I realized that my grandma never needed it and my results were always good without the additive.

 

 

I am trying to find a link for it but I heard it, originally at ICDS last year.  And some varieties of wheat have more gluten than others and are used differently - some for baking flour, some for all purpose flour, etc.

beth01 Enthusiast

According to my endo ( but he is a doctor so who knows how right he is ) pregnancy causes a lot of chemistry changes in the body leaving women more prone to autoimmune issues. Shortly after having my first child I developed a lot of drug and environmental allergies and Grave's. But, until men start having babies there is no way to prove that theory.

I don't think there are higher incidences of these disease, just more awareness and education about them.

JodyM75 Apprentice

Thanks everyone!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,439
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.