Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Blood Work, Negative Biopsy?

Bttrfly62

Recommended Posts

Bttrfly62 Rookie
Bttrfly62
Posted

Has anyone ever had positive blood work (tTG and Gliadin Deamidated ABS), but had a negative biopsy? I went in for an endoscopy yesterday and when I woke up, he said everything looked really good and there wasn't any visible damage. Obviously I have to wait for the results in a week or so, but it made me wonder if it was possible that it would come back negative because no damage (or possibly not enough damage?) was done at this point? Thanks in advance! 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

There are folks that have had negative biopsies even with positive blood work. Sometimes damage is patchy and it can be missed. With positive blood work you do need the diet no matter what the biopsy results turn out to be. Since you have postive blood work and have had your biopsy you can go ahead and start the diet you don't need to wait for the results.

You may even find you get some relief from your symptoms before the biopsy is even back.

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

Visually, my GI thought I looked fine, but my biopsies showed a Marsh Stage IIIB (moderate to severe damage). Based on member comments, this seems to be the norm. After all the villi are pretty small! Remember, too that the small intestinal tract when stretched out is about the size of a tennis court. There are many damaged areas that could be missed. Let's hope your GI took the recommended six biopsy samples!

So, start that gluten-free diet. Chances are you have celiac disease!

Bttrfly62 Rookie
Bttrfly62
Posted
  • Author

I specifically asked how many he was taking (because of this page!) and he said 6- i know more than 6 is better, but at least he hit the minimum! Does the medical profession disregard the possibility of Celiac without a positive biopsy? Just seems like a flawed "gold standard" if it can't be 100% accurate! Seems to me that the biopsy should show SOME damage, or I will be very confused... malabsorption of meds was actually why I ended up in the GI world to begin with... would seem odd if enough damage was done to prevent proper absorption, but not to confirm a diagnosis? But stranger things have happened! Thanks for the responses! 

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

The diagnostic process is flawed and the leading researchers know it, but the technology just is not there. I wish it were easier and consistent!

Waiting is hard when it involves lab tests. However, there is the option of going gluten free. Yep. It can be done. My husband did just that 14 years ago per the poor advice of his GP and my allergist. It worked! Symptoms resolved! He will say that I have had it easier in terms of medical support (friends and family too) but he refuses to do a challenge. Who can blame him?

So, there is always the option of going gluten-free and healing!

Bttrfly62 Rookie
Bttrfly62
Posted
  • Author

Once I take the plunge, I'm not going back- that seems like an awful thing to do to yourself and for no real gain. 6 months is a very, very, long time when you feel terrible! Especially after you've figured out what the problem is and have fixed it! 

captaincrab55 Collaborator
captaincrab55
Posted

Were you eating gluten before the biopsy?     You could have DH.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Bttrfly62 Rookie
Bttrfly62
Posted
  • Author

Yep, no change in my daily gluten consumption- which is substantial! Dh? Dermatitis Herpetiformis? I don't have a rash. Honestly, my actual symptoms seem much milder than many others, the most bothersome of which overlap a great deal with my poorly controlled Hashimoto's. I think I was lucky- If you can say that with Celiac? Being on a regularly tested med allowed them to catch an absorption issue. I'm not sure I would ever have pursued any GI path if my ends hadn't been convinced Celiac was causing the dosing and control difficulties. I know many struggle for years to get on the right path and get the support they need. I had a Celiac diagnosis before I knew there was a problem!

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

Lucky you! My Hashi's was swinging wildly just prior to my diagnosis, but my docs just attributed it to the last year of perimenopause. I went for a routine colonoscopy after I went through menopause. I was very anemic. Again, my other doctors just thought it was due to my Thalassemia (gentic anemia). But my GI guy caught it. At the time, I had no intestinal issues. My Hashi's finally stabilized but it took about two years.

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

Most celiacs do not have visual damage during the biopsy.  That's pretty normal so far.  :)

 

If the biopsy does come back negative, keep in mind that the biopsy has a sensitivity as low as 80%, meaning up to 1 in every celiacs will have a negative biopsy.  A negative biopsy does NOT disregard positive blood tests, it just doesn't support it.  If you have two positive blood tests, the celiac disease is a sure thing.  :(  Page 12 of this report shows how specific the tests actually are: Open Original Shared Link

 

Good luck with the gluten-free diet.  :)

  • 2 weeks later...
Bttrfly62 Rookie
Bttrfly62
Posted
  • Author

Well, results officially came back negative. He basically said that I had 2 strong positive blood results and one weak positive and a negative biopsy, so let's assume no celiac and keep going on gluten until we can see damage and then it's Celaic. Kinda confused and super irritated. I guess I don't understand how specific Celiac tests come back positive but because I havent jeopardized my health enough (I have only had mild symptoms for 3 years and med absorption issues for about a year) to have Celiac? I realize that I can always make that gluten free step myself, but being told it isn't really doing any damage, is not a real motivator. I kinda feel like I was given a pregnancy test at the dr's office that came back positive, but was told "you aren't 12 weeks pregnant so you can keep drinking alcohol" or something. Anyway, just wanted to update-good, but confusing, results.

Palvyre Apprentice
Palvyre
Posted

Please ask for a genetic test and if positive move on to a trial gluten-free diet and retest antibodies in 3-4 months. I had a high positive test and my biopsy was negative. My doctor followed through with the genetic testing and then trial diet. My antibodies went to normal and I received an official diagnosis. Since then I had found out I have osteoporosis due to long term undiagnosed celiac disease, I am only 39 and male. This is not something to mess around with.

foam Apprentice
foam
Posted

You have auto immune disease , positive bloods. You have celiac disease. Genius idea to do nothing, wait for the damage to be permanent, wait till you get t cell cancer, hodgkins. Great idea:). STOP EATING THAT SHIT TODAY, thats what any sane doctor would tell you. Ps have the gene test, if you have that and eat enough bread you will get celiac disease... Eventually 

Bttrfly62 Rookie
Bttrfly62
Posted
  • Author

I felt the same way- i wasn't sure when the medical profession moved to "first do harm, then confirm it's harmful"- but I guess that's where Celiac is categorized? I've had the genetic testing- positive for the genes. Literally, he is not convinced without visible damage. Has anyone else had a GI dr who practiced that way? I do think it was inadvertently caught early (because of the med levels), but early is still positive, right? Has anyone ever had positive bloodwork, negative biopsy, stayed on gluten because doc says it probably isn't Celiac and never actually done any damage to the villi?

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

You really need to consider yourself diagnosed, IMHO. You have the genes and you had positive blood tests. You ARE celiac. Did you get a copy of your biopsy results? How many biopsies did the doctor do? Some idiot doctors won't diagnose until the villi are totally destroyed. Plus with you still on gluten chances are you will need lots more appointments and repeat endos so it is much better financially for the doc to keep you on gluten until your gut is totally destroyed. Celiac...the one disease that doctors want us half dead before they will diagnose.

foam Apprentice
foam
Posted

We are going to come down pretty harshly on this because the long term undiagnosed are living with unfixable problems. Keep eating gluten and you may as well roll a dice on your next autoimmune disease. Get unlucky there and you can end up with organ failure. Youll be at a very high risk of cancer, brain disease etc. Its like dead serious buisness, for you gluten is poison and thats the respect it needs.

Bttrfly62 Rookie
Bttrfly62
Posted
  • Author

It's funny because i actually already have 2 autoimmune diseases- I guess I just don't understand why he was so dismissive. It isn't like I'm hoping something is wrong. I actually expected negative bloodworm, but if the bloodwork doesn't matter, I guess I don't understand the point in doing it at all. I've generally been pretty happy with my medical care, but I can't say I'm at all happy this time. As many long term Celiacs can attest to on the forum, remaining gluten free can be a real challenge to maintain when you are told you don't have Celiac (and are only very mildly affected by the symptoms) and gluten will not affect you either way.

notme Experienced
notme
Posted

I felt the same way- i wasn't sure when the medical profession moved to "first do harm, then confirm it's harmful"- but I guess that's where Celiac is categorized? I've had the genetic testing- positive for the genes. Literally, he is not convinced without visible damage. Has anyone else had a GI dr who practiced that way? I do think it was inadvertently caught early (because of the med levels), but early is still positive, right? Has anyone ever had positive bloodwork, negative biopsy, stayed on gluten because doc says it probably isn't Celiac and never actually done any damage to the villi?

 

you have positive bloodwork!  not to mention the genes and the other AI diseases....  you have celiac.  get a new doctor.  i *was* half dead (ok, mostly dead!) before they even considered testing for celiac (never even heard of it, been going to doctor after doctor with seemingly unrelated symptoms)  start eating gluten free, read the newbie 101 section on the 'coping with' forum, and start feeling better!  what the crap is wrong with that doctor....  why in the world would he just dismiss such a serious (and systemic!) disease is beyond me.

 

welcome to the club you never wanted to join  <_<  the good news is that eating gluten free will probably make your other ai diseases more manageable.  good luck and welcome to the forum :)

bartfull Rising Star
bartfull
Posted

Get copies of all the blood work, the gene test, and of the biopsies. Then take them to a different doctor. If you're lucky enough to find a decent doctor he will look at those tests and give you an official diagnosis.

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

The bottom line here is that the vast majority of GI's STILL don't understand celiac disease nor how to diagnose it and apparently have their heads up their ass when they think it's okay for you to keep damaging yourself until THEY can see the damage. It's a very sad state of affairs. Those of us who have been on here a while have heard it over & over & over again and still it seems to shock us every time.

It's extremely difficult to find a GI who actually knows what they're talking about when it comes to celiac disease. 

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

Well, results officially came back negative. He basically said that I had 2 strong positive blood results and one weak positive and a negative biopsy, so let's assume no celiac and keep going on gluten until we can see damage and then it's Celaic. Kinda confused and super irritated. I guess I don't understand how specific Celiac tests come back positive but because I havent jeopardized my health enough (I have only had mild symptoms for 3 years and med absorption issues for about a year) to have Celiac? I realize that I can always make that gluten free step myself, but being told it isn't really doing any damage, is not a real motivator. I kinda feel like I was given a pregnancy test at the dr's office that came back positive, but was told "you aren't 12 weeks pregnant so you can keep drinking alcohol" or something. Anyway, just wanted to update-good, but confusing, results.

 

 Ugh... This is why celiacs suffer for so many years.  :(  They MISSED the damage in the biopsy so you don't have celiac?! Sigh.

 

I agree that you most likely do have celiac disease.  A negative biopsy does not support your positive tests.  That's it.  It doesn't mean that it cancels them out.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. knitty kitty
      - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens. I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium. I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells. When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly. This is safe...
    2. Jane02
      - Jane02 replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency. I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently...
    3. knitty kitty
      - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      Hello, @Jane02, I take Naturewise D 3. It contains olive oil. Some Vitamin D supplements, like D Drops, are made with fractionated coconut oil which can cause digestive upsets. Fractionated coconut oil is not the same as coconut oil used for cooking. Fractionated coconut oil has been treated for longer shelf life, so it won't go bad in the...
    4. Scott Adams
      0

      Penobscot Bay, Maine: Nurturing Gluten-Free Wellness Retreat with expert celiac dietitian, Melinda Dennis

      until
      Hello! Join me and treat yourself to a four-day, three-night restorative gluten-free retreat in a peaceful, private coastal retreat setting near Penobscot Bay in Maine. Dates: April 10-13, 2026 Enjoy engaging classes...
    5. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product.
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,331
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Kristy2026
    Newest Member
    Kristy2026
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
    • Jane02
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By Jane02 · Posted

      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency.  I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently meet from my diet is vitamin D. Calcium is a hit and miss as I rely on vegetables, dark leafy greens as a major source, for my calcium intake. I'm able to meet it when I either eat or juice a bundle of kale or collard greens daily haha. My thiamine intake is roughly 120% of my needs, although I do recognize that I may not be absorbing all of these nutrients consistently with intermittent unintentional exposures to gluten.  My vitamin A intake is roughly 900% (~6400 mcg/d) of my needs as I eat a lot of sweet potato, although since it's plant-derived vitamin A (beta-carotene) apparently it's not likely to cause toxicity.  Thanks again! 
    • knitty kitty
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Hello, @Jane02,  I take Naturewise D 3.  It contains olive oil.   Some Vitamin D supplements, like D Drops, are made with fractionated coconut oil which can cause digestive upsets.  Fractionated coconut oil is not the same as coconut oil used for cooking.  Fractionated coconut oil has been treated for longer shelf life, so it won't go bad in the jar, and thus may be irritating to the digestive system. I avoid supplements made with soy because many people with Celiac Disease also react to soy.  Mixed tocopherols, an ingredient in Thornes Vitamin D, may be sourced from soy oil.  Kirkland's has soy on its ingredient list. I avoid things that might contain or be exposed to crustaceans, like Metagenics says on its label.  I have a crustacean/shellfish/fish allergy.  I like Life Extension Bioactive Complete B Complex.  I take additional Thiamine B 1 in the form Benfotiamine which helps the intestines heal, Life Extension MegaBenfotiamine. Thiamine is needed to activate Vitamin D.   Low thiamine can make one feel like they are getting glutened after a meal containing lots of simple carbohydrates like white rice, or processed gluten free foods like cookies and pasta.   It's rare to have a single vitamin deficiency.  The water soluble B Complex vitamins should be supplemented together with additional Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine and Thiamine TTFD (tetrahydrofurfuryl disulfide) to correct subclinical deficiencies that don't show up on blood tests.  These are subclinical deficiencies within organs and tissues.  Blood is a transportation system.  The body will deplete tissues and organs in order to keep a supply of thiamine in the bloodstream going to the brain and heart.   If you're low in Vitamin D, you may well be low in other fat soluble vitamins like Vitamin A and Vitamin K. Have you seen a dietician?
    • Scott Adams
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By trents · Posted

      Contact them.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.