Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Are Kashi Gluten Free Waffles safe?


Forman337

Recommended Posts

Forman337 Apprentice

I have a box of Kashi Gluten free waffles and an unsure if they are cross-contamination safe. The box says they're gluten free but it doesn't have the gluten-free verified symbol and I'm worried about cross contamination issues. The ingredients even list whole oat flour, and whole grain sorghun flour. Anyone else tried Kashi Gluten Free waffles? Any bad reactions? My gluten sensitivity is very high so I have to be super careful. Any info would be a great help! Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



dharwood Rookie

I am still somewhat new to celiac disease (dx'd in May). My symptoms included stomach issues but since going gluten-free it seems like my muscles, joints, brain fog and depression have been plaguing me. Two weeks ago I probably had the best 5 days in a row since May. Then last week it all came back bad. After reading your post, I checked the freezer and low and behold, my wife had been putting them in my lunch. I have no clue if that's why I feel this way but I darn sure threw them out. I will be following this post to see if you find anything out. Thanks. 

kareng Grand Master

I didn't know they made gluten-free waffles.  Why not ask the company what they do to make sure they are gluten-free - testing?    Segregated manufacturing, etc.  when you find out, please come back and post the answers.

 

there seems to be some odd labeling law, or maybe it's some companies interpretation - but they aren't supposed to add extra words to ingredient lists.  So they aren't supposed to say " gluten free oats" .  They are allowed to call the product gluten-free if the oats are.  I think the law is meant to prevent hard to read ingredients lists like " delicious whole grain corn, nautral sea salt, ..."  

  • 3 months later...
Fbmb Rising Star
On 10/2/2016 at 11:38 AM, Forman337 said:

I have a box of Kashi Gluten free waffles and an unsure if they are cross-contamination safe. The box says they're gluten free but it doesn't have the gluten-free verified symbol and I'm worried about cross contamination issues. The ingredients even list whole oat flour, and whole grain sorghun flour. Anyone else tried Kashi Gluten Free waffles? Any bad reactions? My gluten sensitivity is very high so I have to be super careful. Any info would be a great help! Thanks!

My understanding is that they couldn't say that they are gluten free if they aren't. Is that not correct? 

cyclinglady Grand Master
38 minutes ago, Fbmb said:

My understanding is that they couldn't say that they are gluten free if they aren't. Is that not correct? 

This might help and it is easier to understand than the actual FDA ruling:

https://www.verywell.com/fda-rules-for-gluten-free-labeling-562768

The bottom line is that if the label says it is gluten free, it should have less than 20 parts per million.  But some people react to ANY gluten and 20 parts may be too much.  This is something you have to figure out for yourself (yeah, celiac disease sucks!)  This can be much easier to discover if you have DH (celiac rash).  

For  example, I personally jumped on the gluten-free band wagon after my diagnosis.  It was easy since my hubby had been gluten-free for 12 years prior to my diagnosis.  My learning curve was short as I had been shopping and cooking gluten-free for him.  Problem was my gut was damaged and his had long healed.  I blamed glutenings  on things like gluten-free bread, but it really was an intolerance to xanthan gum (it still bothers me).  Problem solved when I baked for myself.  time went on and  I healed.  Anemia resolved, but then I was diagnosed with diabetes.  I eliminated pretty much all grains and sugary junk.    Wow, I felt so good!  This past holiday season, I indulged in gluten-free baked goods.  Hum.....found out that it really did not make me feel good.  Not exactly a glutening, but off.  (could be elevated blood sugar).  

So, some folks can eat gluten-free foods that are processed and some can not.  The spectrum is wide.  You just need to find out where you fall on that line.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fbmb Rising Star
1 hour ago, cyclinglady said:

This might help and it is easier to understand than the actual FDA ruling:

https://www.verywell.com/fda-rules-for-gluten-free-labeling-562768

The bottom line is that if the label says it is gluten free, it should have less than 20 parts per million.  But some people react to ANY gluten and 20 parts may be too much.  This is something you have to figure out for yourself (yeah, celiac disease sucks!)  This can be much easier to discover if you have DH (celiac rash).  

For  example, I personally jumped on the gluten-free band wagon after my diagnosis.  It was easy since my hubby had been gluten-free for 12 years prior to my diagnosis.  My learning curve was short as I had been shopping and cooking gluten-free for him.  Problem was my gut was damaged and his had long healed.  I blamed glutenings  on things like gluten-free bread, but it really was an intolerance to xanthan gum (it still bothers me).  Problem solved when I baked for myself.  time went on and  I healed.  Anemia resolved, but then I was diagnosed with diabetes.  I eliminated pretty much all grains and sugary junk.    Wow, I felt so good!  This past holiday season, I indulged in gluten-free baked goods.  Hum.....found out that it really did not make me feel good.  Not exactly a glutening, but off.  (could be elevated blood sugar).  

So, some folks can eat gluten-free foods that are processed and some can not.  The spectrum is wide.  You just need to find out where you fall on that line.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

So in most cases with gluten-free foods it isn't the traces of gluten that makes you sick, but other ingredients? It's just good to know because any time I feel off or have an issue with something I assume it's gluten and that it's setting me back. But knowing it could be an additive at least lets me know my immune system isn't destroying my intestines after eating something. Of course I always avoid things once I know they don't set well.

cyclinglady Grand Master

It CAN be related to traces of gluten.  It CAN be other ingredients.  It is why we tend to stress Whole Foods when you are first starting out until you see signs of healing (or your antibodies are on a downward trend).  


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



squirmingitch Veteran
12 hours ago, cyclinglady said:

It CAN be related to traces of gluten.  It CAN be other ingredients.  It is why we tend to stress Whole Foods when you are first starting out until you see signs of healing (or your antibodies are on a downward trend).  

Exactly!

One has to find this out for oneself. Like cyclinglady says.... it could be either.....or even both. I found out I am extremely sensitive to ANY trace gluten. No certified gluten free foods for me even those that don't contain any other "additives". I am presently on the Fasano gluten contamination elimination diet which is very limiting. Only FRESH fruits & veggies, FRESH meats, no cured meats, unflavored milk & yogurt, aged unflavored cheeses, nuts IN THE SHELL, dried beans b/c you can sort & wash them. No canned or frozen fruits & veggies. I am doing better on this diet than I ever was before! In other words, it eliminates any chance of even getting .05 ppm of gluten.

  • 11 months later...
Huh Newbie

Just called Kashi and they verified internal testing of all Kashi products labeled gluten free to be < 20 ppm, they buy gluten-free oats, use good manufacturing practices with separate lines, etc. Not tested by third party which is why you don’t see the “certified” gluten-free label.  Hope that helps, some more sensitive people may still react?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,442
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nony
    Newest Member
    Nony
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.