Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    GliadinX



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
    GliadinX


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confusing Test Result


Grumpopotamus

Recommended Posts

Grumpopotamus Rookie

Happy Monday friends,

I am new to this forum.  I'm a 36 y/o female, and am seeing a GI doctor for bowel changes and other unsavory symptoms.  I have suspected Celiac, and although the GI doctor said he didn't think it was Celiac, he ordered tests to be thorough. I have waited a few days to hear from his office regarding the results, but I received the results via email. I'm awful at this waiting game.  What the HECK does this mean?  I'm seeing conflicting numbers online, and I'm utterly confused.  Thank you for any light you can shed on these numbers:  

  • Endomysial Antibody Iga  Negative
  • T-Transglutaminase (Ttg) Iga  5  High

            Ref range:   0-3 U/ml

  • Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum:  224 Normal

           Ref Range:   87-352 mg/dL


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Authentic Foods
NutHouse! Granola Co.



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Food for Life


cyclinglady Grand Master

Welcome!  

I am not a doctor, so you should discuss your results with her/him.  But....you have a positive.  It only takes one on the panel.  You are not IgA deficient (your 224 result).  This is a control test (in this case) to determine if the TTG IgA or EMA IgA test was valid.  This means the testing worked!  

Keep eating gluten.  The next step is an endoscopy to obtain biopsies to see villi damage.   Any other questions?  We are here to help ?.  

Grumpopotamus Rookie

Thank you, cyclinglady. Your explanation is very helpful. My favorite part of your reply is when you said "keep eating gluten!" ?  I didn't realize only one of those needs to be positive, and references ranges seem to be different everywhere.  Thank you!

cyclinglady Grand Master

Those chickens on your avatar?  Are they yours?  

cyclinglady Grand Master

More about testing......

Open Original Shared Link

and....learn about the gluten free diet, but do not start it until all testing is done (lab results in your hands!)

 

Grumpopotamus Rookie

Thank you; when I saw the "high" result, I immediately thought I should modify my diet, but I see why I should hold off for now. 

Yes, those are my hens, silly things ?

Jmg Mentor

Hi! You may find some of the links in this thread of use?

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Tierra Farm
Lakefront Brewery



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Food for Life


Grumpopotamus Rookie

The nurse from the GI clinic called this morning and said the doctor "said everything is normal" (he had also ordered a CBC panel and TSH). I told her I was concerned about the one "high" value on the Celiac portion, and the response was "Well he is the hospital doctor and won't be back until next week. You can ask him about it at your procedure." 

I have a colonoscopy scheduled for next Wednesday, due to the symptoms I was having when he ordered the blood work.  Talk about confused and frustrated <_<

cyclinglady Grand Master

What??????? You should seriously consider a new GI!  You do NOT need to have a positive on every single celiac disease test -- just one.  He used the most common and standard test the TTG IgA and it was positive!   See this celiac disease diagnostic alogrithm from the Mayo Clinic  for yourself (do not look at the ranges since these do not match your lab ranges and labs vary).  

Open Original Shared Link

Why isn't he following the College of GI's recommendations for diagnosing celiac disease as published in the American Gastroenterology Journal?  

Open Original Shared Link

Wait, can you re-confirm your lab ranges?  

Forget talking to the nurse.  Document your concern in a letter to arrive by next week and reference the links if you want to cover all bases!   A colonoscopy RARELY catches celiac disease because most damage occurs just past the stomach.  You probably need both (rule out IBD etc.)

 

Grumpopotamus Rookie

I'm going to run this by my primary care physician and see if we can't get another opinion. 

The reference range on the lab report said 0-3 is "Normal," and that 5 is "High." ?

cyclinglady Grand Master

I can tell you that personally only my DGP IgA was positive on the complete panel: IgG and IgA versions of the TTG, DGP and EMA (this one just IgA was ordered).  My biopsies revealed moderate to severe intestinal damage.  Anemia  was my only symtptom at the time and it resolved in the gluten free diet.  Even in follow-up testing, I still test positive to the DGP only (when glutened).  Weird, but true.  That is why there are several celiac blood  tests.  The TTG is the preferred for screening (cheap and effective but not 100%).  IF that is negative, the GI can order the rest of the panel, if he suspects celiac disease.  

I would hate to have this overlooked.  Later on, you'll be fracturing bones because it was not diagnosed or like a few members develop lymphoma (rare).  

I bet the GI relies on the EMA which I have never had a positive on.    Wonder how many celiacs he has missed?  

You might not have celiac disease, but if he is doing a colonoscopy, he should do an endoscopy to rule it out.  

squirmingitch Veteran
20 minutes ago, cyclinglady said:

I can tell you that personally only my DGP IgA was positive on the complete panel: IgG and IgA versions of the TTG, DGP and EMA (this one just IgA was ordered).  My biopsies revealed moderate to severe intestinal damage.  Anemia  was my only symtptom at the time and it resolved in the gluten free diet.  Even in follow-up testing, I still test positive to the DGP only (when glutened).  Weird, but true.  That is why there are several celiac blood  tests.  The TTG is the preferred for screening (cheap and effective but not 100%).  IF that is negative, the GI can order the rest of the panel, if he suspects celiac disease.  

I would hate to have this overlooked.  Later on, you'll be fracturing bones because it was not diagnosed or like a few members develop lymphoma (rare).  

I bet the GI relies on the EMA which I have never had a positive on.    Wonder how many celiacs he has missed?  

You might not have celiac disease, but if he is doing a colonoscopy, he should do an endoscopy to rule it out.  

I agree!

Grumpopotamus Rookie

Just an update that may serve others well who are in this situation. The doctor himself called first thing yesterday morning and said he had misread the test results because of how they appeared on his computer screen (?), and promptly scheduled an endoscopy during my procedure next week.  

Moral of this story so far is that if something is confusing, ask until you get answers!  If I hadn't spoken up an asked for a double-check and feedback, well... 

thank you folks for the encouragement. 

cyclinglady Grand Master

Whew!  I am glad it worked out.  ?

squirmingitch Veteran

Yay, Yay!!!! Good for you persisting.

This is also a lesson to others on how important it is to get copies of your medical records & check them over yourself .

Also, a big WHEW! it's nice to know your doc at least recognizes that only one positive is required to move to the endoscopy.

  • 3 weeks later...
Grumpopotamus Rookie

Final Update:  

The endoscopy showed no signs of celiac damage (several biopsies were taken).  There was "minor inflammation - not clinically significant." 

As it happens, endometriosis may be the culprit concerning GI symptoms and back pain; we had a bit of an epiphany-week!

Unsure why the weak positive showed on the ttg, but I will be going "gluten-lite" and monitoring my diet to see what causes flare-ups of symptoms. 

When I realized how difficult a celiac-style life change would be, that was the most worrisome aspect for me if I had shown positive for it on the biopsies. I plan to do some research and approach local restaurants, cafes, bakeries, etc., to get feedback on who provides a true gluten-free experience, and look at the potential for cross-contamination (hey pizza place, is your gluten-free pizza made on the same equipment as the regular stuff?). I hope to compile a good resource for a local family-style publication we have here, and maybe it will help local celiac families make decisions.  

If I were a true celiac, this would be my go-to hangout spot, as you all are very kind and compassionate around here! Thank you for taking the time to listen and give feedback.  

frieze Community Regular

Open Original Shared Link

 

not so fast.....many other links

Jmg Mentor
On 5/6/2017 at 4:04 PM, Grumpopotamus said:

Unsure why the weak positive showed on the ttg, but I will be going "gluten-lite" and monitoring my diet to see what causes flare-ups of symptoms. 

My only worry reading this is that you could actually have celiac or if not non celiac gluten sensitivity, and if so going gluten lite just won't cut it. :(  I know you find the idea of the diet daunting, but do consider trialling it, even just for a couple of weeks. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Victoria5289 Apprentice
On 4/17/2017 at 11:49 AM, Grumpopotamus said:

Happy Monday friends,

I am new to this forum.  I'm a 36 y/o female, and am seeing a GI doctor for bowel changes and other unsavory symptoms.  I have suspected Celiac, and although the GI doctor said he didn't think it was Celiac, he ordered tests to be thorough. I have waited a few days to hear from his office regarding the results, but I received the results via email. I'm awful at this waiting game.  What the HECK does this mean?  I'm seeing conflicting numbers online, and I'm utterly confused.  Thank you for any light you can shed on these numbers:  

  • Endomysial Antibody Iga  Negative
  • T-Transglutaminase (Ttg) Iga  5  High

            Ref range:   0-3 U/ml

  • Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum:  224 Normal

           Ref Range:   87-352 mg/dL

I believe he tried to let you know that this be chromes disease

notme Experienced
6 hours ago, Victoria5289 said:

I believe he tried to let you know that this be chromes disease

is that the disease that makes you incredibly shiny and irresistible to truckers???!!  i think i have that.  explains the husband, too......  ;)

Victoria1234 Experienced
6 hours ago, Victoria5289 said:

I believe he tried to let you know that this be chromes disease

All these short, difficult to understand replies from today's new member are kinda funny. 

icelandgirl Proficient
35 minutes ago, Victoria1234 said:

All these short, difficult to understand replies from today's new member are kinda funny. 

Exactly my thought! ?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
    Little Northern Bakehouse



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,962
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Roieliu
    Newest Member
    Roieliu
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
    Holidaily Brewing Co.


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
    GliadinX




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
    Little Northern Bakehouse



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Hello @CeliacNew, If you are Vegan to help you feel better, reconsider returning to omnivore.  Actually, since you are already on a very restrictive diet, transitioning to gluten free might be easier for you.  Read the ingredient labels, Particularly vitamin D and Choline require supplements for vegan diet because our primary source is sun, eggs and beef.  B12 also.
    • Wheatwacked
      Once you've completed testing and still don't have improvement, start a trial gluten free diet.  Looking for imprvement that may indicate Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity, which is 10 times more prevalent than Celiac Disease. Deficiencies in vitamins B6, B12, D, and C can manifest as skin rashes.  Virtual guaranty you are deficient in vitamin D.
    • cameo674
      So those rs numbers tell researchers where the dbSNP is located in a Genome so that other reasearchers or an AI system can look in that specific spot for that Snip of information.  You can look those rs # s by pasting the numbers after rs into the lookup on this page https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/ right under the Blue header bar at the top of the webpage.  Since you are not a researcher, I do not know how this will help you though.
    • cameo674
      So I posted here once before, and everyone advocated that I get into a GI doc.  I finally got into my functional health appointment on 6/16 to get my blood results evaluated and get the Gastro referral. I was told that I would be fortunate to see a gastro doctor by December, because of the number of people waiting to get in, but they did believe that I needed to see a GI doc among others.  Well, the stars aligned. I got home. I looked at MyChart and it showed an appointment available for later that same day. I never clicked so fast on an appointment time. The gastro doc ran some additional blood work based off the December values that had confirmed my daughter's suspicion that I have undiagnosed stomach issues.  Gastro has also scheduled me to get an upper endoscopy as well as a colonoscopy since it has been 8 years since my last one. She said it would rule out other concerns if I did not show Celiac per the biopsies.  Those biopsies will not occur until August 29th and like everyone here stated, Gastro wants me to keep gluten in my diet exactly as everyone suggested. To be honest, I was barely eating any gluten since I figured I would have plenty of time to do so before testing.  Doc is also looking for the cause of the low level heartburn that I have had for 30 years.  I have mentioned the heartburn to PCPs in the past and they always said take a tums or other OTC drug.  The upper endoscopy is for ruling out eosinphilic esophagitis, h. pylori, and to biopsy the duodenal bulb and second portion to confirm or exclude celiac. The colonoscopy will have random biopsies to rule out microscopic colitis. I didn't really catch her reasoning for the bloodwork.  Doc looked at the December numbers and said they were definitely concerning for Celiac.  She also said, “Hmm that’s odd; usually it’s the reverse”, but I did not catch which result made her say that. She seems very through.  She also asked why I had never bothered to see a GI before.  To be honest, I told her I just assumed that the heartburn and loose stool were a part of aging.  I have been gassy since I was born and thought constantly passing gas was normal?  Everyone I know with Celiac have horrible symptoms that cannot be attributed to other things.  They are in a lot of stomach pain.  I do not go through that.  I attribute my issues to the lactose intolerance that comes with aging, but have slowly been eliminating foods from my diet due to the heartburn or due my assumption that they did not agree with a medication that I was prescribed. I have already eliminated milk products especially high fat ones like ice cream; fats like peanut butter; acids like citrus and tomatoes; chocolate in all forms; and breads more because it is so hard to get in 100 grams of protein if I eat any foods that are not a protein.  I would not have even done the testing if my daughter had not brought up the fact that she thought I might have an undiagnosed condition since she has issues with bloating and another sibling has periodic undiagnosed stomach pain that GI docs throw pills at instead of helping.  Who knew that Bristol scale 5 and 6 were not considered normal especially multiple times a day? I watched my MIL go through basically the same bowel changes starting at 50 so to be honest, I really did think it was normal before this week's appointment.   December 2024's blood tests ran through Quest Labs were:  Deamidated Gliadin (IgA) 53.8 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Deamidated Gliadin (IgG) >250.0 U/mL Above Range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgA) 44.0 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgG) <1.0 In range <15.0; Immunoglobulin A (IgA) 274 mg/dL In range 47-310 mg/dL 6/16/25 bloodwork:  Until today, I did not really know what all the four tubes of blood were for and since I did not understand the results, I got into the clinical notes to see what was ordered, but it did not exactly explain why for everything. Immunoglobulins IGG, IGA, IGM all came back in range:  IGG 1,010 mg/dL In range 600-1,714; IgA 261 mg/dL In range 66-433 mg/dL; IGM 189 mg/dL In range 45-281.  How do these numbers help with diagnosis? Google says she checked these to see if I have an ongoing infection? I do have Hashimoto's and she did say once you have one autoimmune disease others seem to follow. Celiac Associated HLD-DQ Typing: DQA1* Value: 05; DQA1*DQA11 Value: 05; DQB1* Value: 02; DQB1-DQB11 Value: 02; Celiac Gene Pairs Present Value: Yes; Celiac HLA Interpretation Value: These genes are permissive for celiac disease.  However, these genes can also be present in the normal population. Testing performed by SSOP.  So google failed me.  I think these results basically say I have genes, but everybody has these genes so this test was just to confirm that there is a vague possibility?  Maybe this test result explains why I do not have the horrible symptoms most individuals with celiac have?  I told the GI my assumption is that I am just gluten intolerant since I do not have the pain? So maybe this test explains why I have antibodies? Comprehensive Metabolic Panel: Everything was in the middle of the normal range.  Google says this just says I am metabolically healthy. Tissue Transglutaminase ABS test results – Done by the Mayo Clinic’s Labs –  T-Transglutaminase IGA AB --Value: 3.1 U/mL – Normal Value is <4.0 (negative) U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase, IgG -- Value: 15.3 U/mL High -- Normal Value is <6.0 (Negative) U/mL – Interpretation Positive (>9.0) – These are the only labs the GI did that have been labeled Abnormal.  I am confused at how/why these came back different than the December labs? Because these numbers seem to be the opposite of what the were in December and I know I have eaten less gluten.  They were definitely measured differently and had different ranges. This must be why she said they are usually opposite? Molecular Stool Parasite Panel said I was Negative for Giardia Lamblia by PCR; Entamoeba Histolytica by PCR and Cryptosporidium Parvum/Hominis by PCR.  So at least I do not need to do a parasite cleanse like everyone on TikTok seems to be doing. So I guess, I am just really asking why the Tissue Transglutaminase numbers are different.  Was it because they were truly different tests? Is it because I have not consumed the crazy amount of gluten one is suppose to eat prior to testing? To be honest, I thought that was only for the biopsy testing. I generally only eat twice a day, and the thought of eating the equivalent of 6 slices of bread is daunting. Even in my youth, I probably only consumed the equivalent of maybe 3 slices a day. Like I said before, now I usually focus on trying to eat 60 gram of protein.  I am suppose to consume 100 grams, but have failed to succeed. I will focus on eating gluten starting in July now that I know my procedure date.
    • Scott Adams
      I agree with @trents and wiping down the spot you eat your lunch, and eating the food your brought from home should be safe for even sensitive celiacs. Gluten can jump on your food, so it would likely better better for you to continue eating where you prefer.
×
×
  • Create New...