Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Does A Weak Positive Ttga Mean?

roses8

Recommended Posts

roses8 Newbie
roses8
Posted

Hi there,

I was wondering if anyone knows what it means to have a weak positive TTGA (tissue transglutamine level? I have had two consecutive weak positive results. What is the likelihood that someone with a weak positive result is actually a true celiac? I have had persistent gas and bloating, and lactose intolerance. My doctor says a biopsy is the next step, but that seems a bit drastic.

Actually, I am confused about the research that I have read because; usually there are lots of references to the presence of these ttga auto antibodies, as being a strong indication of celiac. But if that is true, why are there any normal levels of these antibodies, do most people have a small amount of them, or not? And if normal people have them, what are they for?

Thanks for any insight into this,

Roses

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Rachel--24 Collaborator
Rachel--24
Posted

A positive tTG (even a weak positive) is indicative of Celiac. The next logical step would be to have the biopsy or begin the diet. If the biopsy is negative you could still have Celiac as the biopsy can't rule OUT celiac. If its positive then there are no doubts about it. The biopsy is no big deal...its totally pain-free. I'm pretty sure its best to have no tTG present but if its higher than what is considered to be the "normal" range then this indicates that damage is occurring due to gluten consumption.

key Contributor
key
Posted

I had a weak positive too, but I had been on the gluten-free diet for two months already. I was feeling better and didn't wish to start eating gluten again for a biopsy. I would recommend you have the biopsy. My GI told me I probably had Celiac (my son has it too) and to follow the diet. My level was two points below the abnormal. He said most people that don't have it, would have a number of Zero. My other son got tested and his number was zero, plus all his other celiac panel levels were normal.

The biopsy is painless so they say and I sort of wish I had had it done, but not willing to make myself sick again to have it done.

Monica

jnclelland Contributor
jnclelland
Posted
He said most people that don't have it, would have a number of Zero.

Really? I had this test done after 6 weeks off wheat, and my numbers were 3.8 IGA/3.9 IGG, with "normal" being anything less than 20. I assumed that this was a definitive negative - not too surprising since I had been off wheat for 6 weeks. But I *was* still eating barley and rye at the time, and I've been trying to find out if a test done at that point could yield any useful information at all. It would be nice to have something in the way of useful test results, but no way am I going back on gluten just for that!

Jeanne

roses8 Newbie
roses8
Posted
  • Author

Jeanne,

That was my understanding too, that anything less than 20 was negative, and that anything over twenty is suspect. But, I don't know whether most "normal" people have numbers that are close to twenty, or not.

My numbers for TTGA were in the low mid twenties. I have heard that most celiacs not on the diet have much higher numbers than that, but I'm not sure.

It is very confusing. Does anyone else remember their pre-diagnosis antibody level ?

AmandaD Community Regular
AmandaD
Posted

My TTG antibody level at my doctor's office was only 10.5 and they found moderate damage when they did the endoscopy...weird?

Jeanne,

That was my understanding too, that anything less than 20 was negative, and that anything over twenty is suspect. But, I don't know whether most "normal" people have numbers that are close to twenty, or not.

My numbers for TTGA were in the low mid twenties. I have heard that most celiacs not on the diet have much higher numbers than that, but I'm not sure.

It is very confusing. Does anyone else remember their pre-diagnosis antibody level ?

ryebaby0 Enthusiast
ryebaby0
Posted

My son's pre-dx Ttg was 152, after 3 months gluten-free it was 75, and after 20 months it was 8.

My husband's Ttg was 24, a "weak positive" and his GI wanted to scope him. My son's peds GI said that in her opinion, there's no such thing as a weak positive -- non-celiacs are clearly negative, celiacs (silent ones included) are positive or weakly positive. He opted not to have a biopsy, on the grounds that it could easily miss a damaged spot, come back negative, and he'd be misdiagnosed.

So he went gluten-free, has never felt better in his whole life. Has not yet been re-tested

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


floridanative Community Regular
floridanative
Posted

Sorry to add to the confusion but my tTg was only a 10 in Sept. (doc said probably have Celiac) and only a 7 in Nov. (2nd doc said no way I have Celiac) so I went to a 3rd doc to break the tie. He looked at both test result labs and said my number wa coming down, not going up, so I don't have it. Insisted on a biopsy b/c other 2 docs said I needed it. 3rd doc called last Monday to say my results show classic Celiac Sprue. Also on my lab pages it clearly states 5-9 is weak positive and 10+ is positive but apparently every lab is different. No wonder everyone is so confused about this condition.

AmandaD Community Regular
AmandaD
Posted

Good for you, floridanative - I'm glad you were diagnosed solidly sprue and that you pursued it. Funny how doctors are...

Sorry to add to the confusion but my tTg was only a 10 in Sept. (doc said probably have Celiac) and only a 7 in Nov. (2nd doc said no way I have Celiac) so I went to a 3rd doc to break the tie. He looked at both test result labs and said my number wa coming down, not going up, so I don't have it. Insisted on a biopsy b/c other 2 docs said I needed it. 3rd doc called last Monday to say my results show classic Celiac Sprue. Also on my lab pages it clearly states 5-9 is weak positive and 10+ is positive but apparently every lab is different. No wonder everyone is so confused about this condition.
SueC Explorer
SueC
Posted

Please be careful when looking at the numbers. Different labs have different values for negative and positive. It all depends on where your bloodwork is sent. The lab should provide the doctor with thier specific normal and abnormal ranges.

floridanative Community Regular
floridanative
Posted

Thanks AmandaD. When I think back at how I had to trick the doc into doing the biopsy by saying that I'd just go back to the first GI and get him to do it, I realized that if someone less headstrong than I had been sitting in his office, they would have left happily with the untrue knowledge that they didnt' have Celiac and continued to get sicker. Once he called last week I realized why he would not look me in the eyes after the endo. I'm sure he saw the damage but would not mention it to me since he basically treated me like a hypochondriac in his office 10 days before. Nice!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,058
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Sammi19760
    Newest Member
    Sammi19760
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Blood results

      By trents · Posted

      Maybe celiac but maybe NCGS that was misdiagnosed as IBS morphing gradually into celiac. Is NCGS a new category to you? It shares many of the same GI symptoms with celiac disease but does not damage the small bowel lining like celiac.
    • knitty kitty
      Oral thrush question

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Thiamine has antifungal properties.  The body uses thiamine to keep bacteria and yeasts from overgrowth in the digestive system.   Fluconazole use can cause thiamine deficiency.   Supplementing with thiamine in the form Benfotiamine would be beneficial as Benfotiamine promotes intestinal healing.   Thiamine and the other B vitamins tend to be low in Celiac due to malabsorption.  Talk to your doctor about supplementing vitamins and minerals.
    • Scott Adams
      Nutrient deficiencies despite normal MARSH and strict gluten-free diet

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Welcome @Natalia Revelo, your experience is profoundly difficult and, sadly, not entirely unique within the celiac community. It's the frustrating reality of "silent" or ongoing damage that isn't captured by the MARSH score alone, which only measures active villous atrophy. Your normal biopsy suggests your diet is preventing the classic autoimmune attack, but it doesn't mean your gut has fully healed or that other issues aren't at play. The inflammation from your newly discovered milk and egg allergies is a huge clue; this constant allergic response can create a low-grade inflammatory environment that severely hampers nutrient absorption, effectively creating a "leaky gut" scenario independent of celiac damage. This is likely why your iron stores deplete so rapidly—your body is both unable to absorb it efficiently and may be losing it through inflammation. While the functional medicine path is expensive, it's clearly providing answers and relief that traditional gastroenterology, focused solely on the gluten-free diet and biopsy results, is missing. To move forward, continue the gut-healing protocols your functional doctor recommends (perhaps exploring alternative options to glutamine that won't irritate your cystitis), maintain your strict avoidance of all allergens and irritants, and know that true healing is a multi-faceted process. You might seek a second opinion from a different gastroenterologist who is more knowledgeable about non-responsive celiac disease and the complex interplay of food allergies and micronutrient absorption, but your current path, while costly, seems to be leading you toward the steady health you need.
    • knitty kitty
      Blood results

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Have you had a DNA test to look for Celiac disease genes?  If she doesn't have any celiac specific genes, look for another explanation.  If she does have Celiac genes, assume they are turned on and active Celiac disease is progressing.  All first degree relatives (mother, father, siblings, children) should be genetically tested as well.   Sometimes blood tests are ambiguous or false negatives if one has anemia, diabetes or thiamine deficiency.  Certain medications like antihistamines and steroids can suppress the immune system and result in false negatives or ambiguous results on antibody tests.  
    • Heatherisle
      Blood results

      By Heatherisle · Posted

      That was just the visual report, so need to wait for confirmation or otherwise from the results. They did take a biopsy from the upper end of the duodenum(D1). D2 looked unremarkable on the camera. Just wish we didn’t have to wait so long for the results as she’s naturally a very anxious person. But thanks so much for taking the time to answer me
×
×
  • Create New...