Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Doubting Dr. Thomas


L.A.

Recommended Posts

L.A. Contributor

My gastro guy is having issues commiting 100% to me having celiac disease <_< . A specialist did the blood test which came back positive for Celiacs. My gastro guy decided to do a biopsy and it was negative. Is the blood test proof positive?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mouse Enthusiast

Yes, it is. You can never have a false positive, but you can have a false negative. Many doctors still think of the biopsy as the gold standard. The problem with it, is if he does not take enough biopsies from the right areas, then the test can be negative. I only had the blood test and never the biopsy. But, I had also become the "classic celiac" before the diagnosis. So, my doctor did not think it was necessary for me to have it done.

Phila Rookie

My doc diagnosed me based on symptoms alone, but then again I had a tonne of symptoms. He's a huge proponent of looking at dietary response to come to a diagnosis. I must say that I do regret not having all of the tests, although I am absolutely convinced I have celiac disease.

Today was actually a scary day for me. My prolactin levels are high again so doc has ordered a CT scan to check for a pituitary tumour. I'd been having a tonne of issues lately which I thought were biliary related, but my doc seems to have dismissed that. He's worried about the prolactin and kept staring at those numbers.

Guest nini

a pos. blood test is absolutely proof positive... just because the biopsy didn't find anything, it doesn't mean diddly squat... you have Celiac... welcome to the club! Get on with the business of getting well.

I was dx'ed on positive blood work and positive dietary response alone, I did not have a biopsy at all... my Dr. had said that since my blood work was positive I absolutely have it and did not need to go through a biopsy to confirm it.

Guest Robbin
My doc diagnosed me based on symptoms alone, but then again I had a tonne of symptoms. He's a huge proponent of looking at dietary response to come to a diagnosis. I must say that I do regret not having all of the tests, although I am absolutely convinced I have celiac disease.

Today was actually a scary day for me. My prolactin levels are high again so doc has ordered a CT scan to check for a pituitary tumour. I'd been having a tonne of issues lately which I thought were biliary related, but my doc seems to have dismissed that. He's worried about the prolactin and kept staring at those numbers.

:( I am sorry you have been having these problems. I haven't seen you post before, so welcome.

Also, ditto for me--the positive bloodwork means just that--positive. Why the medical community does this "song and dance act" around diagnosing this disease, is beyond me.

jayhawkmom Enthusiast

I'm very new here, and still wondering around just reading, reading, and reading. I came across this and wanted to ask, where do you think my daughter fits in here?

For reference purposes - the lab we used gave us the following information as THEIR norms. I realize other labs have other standards.

Ttg - <5 (my daughter's was 4)

IgA - <10 (hers was 9)

IgG - <11 (hers was 72)

EMA - Negative (no number provided)

Total IgE <20 - (hers was over 100 - 170 if I correctly recall)

Positive SPT - wheat/egg

Positive RAST - wheat/egg

(She has other allergies as well)

Negative biopsy for Villi damage, however... she has duadenal ulcers that I'm told are consistant with Celiac.

So, is she.... or isn't she?

She wasn't diagnosed Celiac. She was diagnosed with a Gluten Intolerance. What's the difference? Nothing, as far as the diet is concerned, right??

Thanks!

aikiducky Apprentice

You're right, gluten intolerance means exactly the same diet-wise as celiac, and you need to exactly as careful about cross-contamination, too.

"Celiac" is a name that the doc gives to a disease when all the symptoms and test results are present that the medical community has agreed on have to be there. So when the test results and symptoms aren't exactly according to that list, but it's obvious that gluten is a problem, they call it "gluten intolerance" instead to be completely PC. You need to realize that the definition of "celiac" keeps changing, so in the future, someone with the exact same picture as your daughter may well get diagnosed celiac. They keep changing the definition as more information comes available with reseach, but that of course happens slowly.

Pauliina


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,805
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    lovinlifeafter60
    Newest Member
    lovinlifeafter60
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • xxnonamexx
      What about digestive enzymes that I hear help? I take align 5x probiotics daily.
    • Samanthaeileen1
      thank you RMJ! That is very helpful advice. Good to know we aren’t crazy if we don’t do the endoscopy. We are going to try the gluten free and see how symptoms and levels improve.    thank you Wheatwacked (love the username lol) that is also reassuring. Thankfully she has an amazing and experienced pediatrician. And yesss I forgot to mention the poop! She has the weirdest poop issues.    How long did it take y'all to start seeing improvement in symptoms? 
    • Wheatwacked
      My son was diagnosed when he was weaned in 1976 after several endoscopies.  Given your two year old's symptoms and your family history and your pediatrition advocating for the dx, I would agree.  Whether an endoscopy is positive or negative is irrelevant.   That may happen even with endoscopy.  Pick your doctors with that in mind. In the end you save the potential trauma of the endoscopy for your baby.   Mine also had really nasty poop.  His doctor started him on Nutramigen Infant because at the time it was the only product that was hypo allergenic and had complete nutrition. The improvement was immediate.
    • RMJ
      So her tissue transglutaminase antibody is almost 4x the upper end of the normal range - likely a real result. The other things you can do besides an endoscopy would be: 1.  Genetic testing.  Unfortunately a large proportion of the population has genes permissive for celiac disease, but only a small proportion of those with the genes have it. With family history it is likely she has the genes. 2.  Try a gluten free diet and see if the symptoms go away AND the antibody levels return to normal. (This is what I would do). Endoscopies aren’t always accurate in patients as young as your daughter. Unfortunately, without an endoscopy, some doctor later in her life may question whether she really has celiac disease or not, and you’ll need to be a fierce mama bear to defend the diagnosis! Be sure you have a good written record of her current pediatrician’s diagnosis. Doing a gluten challenge for an endoscopy later in life could cause a very uncomfortable level of symptoms.   Having yourself, your husband and your son tested would be a great idea.  
    • Samanthaeileen1
      here are the lab ranges.  Normal ranges for tissue transglutaminase are: <15.0 Antibody not detected > or = 15.0 Antibody detected normal for endomysial antibody is < 1.5. So she is barely positive but still positive. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.