Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy And Blood Tests Results On 22 Month Old


sadiesmom

Recommended Posts

sadiesmom Rookie

Hello all,

I wrote a month ago that my daughters IGG test came back at 40 when the doctor said it should be under 11 and oculd possibly indicate celiac. We went to the pediatric GI. He was concerned about her weight ( she is around 20 pounds at 22 months). He ordered stool tests, urine, nutritional blood panel, etc...all of these came back normal. We wanted to do the biopsy - and we reluctantly agreed. There was no damage seen and the biopsy was normal.

So - here is my dilema. The nurse calls me last week with the results of the biopsy. She says everything is normal. I said - so you are sure it isn't celiac? She said that they are pretty sure based on her tests.

I dig further by asking about the blood work. In Sadie's original test she has the IGG(which was too high) and the IGA (which was normal). I thought there was a 3rd test called a ttg that should have been taken. The first doctor did not take it and apparently neither did the ped GI even though he took at least a gallon of blood from her. The nurse said that no ttg was ordered. She also said that she was surpised to see that no heredity marker (?) test was ordered.

So at this point - I am furious. Going through all of this. She said that she would order the ttg and I can go get more blood taken from Sadie.

It was my understanding that the ttg was a pretty good indicator of celiac. i am thinking that if that is positive (and then with the positve IGG) she has celiac even though the biospy looked fine. Is that correct? I guess what I want to know is if the ttg is important to get. I have thought about just putting her on the diet. But we've already done the worst (with the biopsy). And I am afraid that if I got her off gluten I would have to put her back on for the blood test.

What do you all think? Is the ttg test as important as I thought it was. I have also asked the doctor why the IGG would be elevated if not celiac. He said he was testing for all sorts of malabsorption and infection and found nothing.

I am extremely frustrated. I don't want to put her through more blood work if the results of the ttg aren't going to matter one way or another.

Thanks,

Amy


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ptkds Community Regular

If I were you, I would just start her on the diet and forget further testing. That is what I have done w/ my older dd's. My dd #2 had one high number, but the "gold standard indicator" number was not elevated. But I just put her on the diet anyway since I have celiac disease and dd#3 has it. The diet is the best test anyway. I had my dd#3 scheduled for a biopsy but when I found out that I was positive, I decided that more testing wasn't needed.

With my dd#1 (who may not have it, but has all the symptoms) I have put her on the diet for 2-3 months, and then I will "challenge" her w/ gluten and see how she reacts.

Good luck and let us know how things go!

ptkds

happygirl Collaborator

Amy,

the tTG test is usually the most indicative of Celiac. However, the fact that your daughter has symptoms and one positive blood test is highly indicative of a problem with gluten. In general, blood testing with young children for Celiac is not very accurate, so I don't think you can necessarily rule it out if its negative.

I had the same problem with doctors who know nothing about Celiac and run the older tests, etc. It is frustrating, but there are many who have been in your same boat, unfortunately.

i think its worth it to have the blood drawn and have the gene test done. just having the gene doesn't mean that your daughter has celiac, though. about 30-40% of the American population has the gene(s), but its good to know if you have it or not, to know if it could be a problem.

also-she may have non-Celiac gluten intolerance, which won't show up on blood work-and your doctor probably won't know anything about! After having the tTG done, it might be worth starting her on the gluten free diet and seeing if she improves. You don't need a doctor's permission to go gluten free. There are many on the board that don't have official diagnoses, but do considerably better on a gluten free diet.

Good luck, and hope this helps.

Laura

rez Apprentice

GET THE tTG TEST!! Trust me, it's very specific and sensitive to Celiac. It's so frustrating that doctors don't know what tests to order. The tTG blood test is the best one for screening for Celiac. The genetic markers can only rule it out, not in, because you can have the gene and not have Celiac. It's a simple blood draw. I highly reccommend the tTG before you go gluten free or get it asap if you already are. My son's tTG still showed positive after 4 months off gluten. It is possible. Gluten free eating is a big deal and totally affects all aspects of a child's life. Everyone here is supportive, and I love that about this board. This is only my point of view. Just think, if it comes back positive, it will answer tons of questions. Good luck. I'm not saying it's wrong if you dont' get the blood test, but what do you have to lose. :)

rez Apprentice

Sorry, forgot to ask the age of your daughter. Sometimes it's not that accurate in young children under 2 or 3. That is maybe why he didn't order it.

rez Apprentice

Saw your daughter is 22 months. Sorry, on the test my doctor ran, anything above 7 was positive and for under 2, anything above 5 was positive. Hope this helps. :) We have a FABULOUS doctor! It's only our 5th try. He has Celiac himself and is very knowledgeable and understanding. Good luck and hang in there. We have learned the most about our son by journaling everything, taking pictures, and keeping a food diary.

chrissy Collaborator

the Ttg may or may not show you anything because your daughter is already gluten free, and some very young children don't produce Ttg antibodies until they are older. my youngest was really small like your daughter is-----she was just about the same weight as your daughter is when she was around the same age as your daughter. she is still only 28 1/2 lbs. at 3 years 3 months. even though we know the test is not really accurate, we have had it run on her. we will continue to test our family on a regular basis until we get the gene test results. then we will only test the ones that carry the celiac gene. you can get celiac without the 2 known genes, but it is NOT very common.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Amy, with a tiny toddler taking blood IS a big deal, and traumatic. You had one very high reading. And she has symptoms. I would just try the diet to see if it makes a difference. Both your doctors sound ignorant and I wouldn't trust them to know what they're doing.

With very young children the tests are very unreliable (including the biopsy), and the diet is the very best test.

You will always still have the option of getting her tested with Open Original Shared Link. Their's is a stool test, meaning non-invasive, and far more sensitive than the traditional tests. And you can do them still within a year of being on the diet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,153
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jenn18
    Newest Member
    Jenn18
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      And I agree with Wheatwacked. When a physician tells you that you can't have celiac disease because you're not losing weight, you can be certain that doctor is operating on a dated understanding of celiac disease. I assume you are in the UK by the way you spelled "coeliac". So, I'm not sure what your options are when it comes to healthcare, but I might suggest you look for another physician who is more up to date in this area and is willing to work with you to get an accurate diagnosis. If, in fact, you do not have celiac disease but you know that gluten causes you problems, you might have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). There is no test available yet for NCGS. Celiac must first be ruled out. Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder that damages the lining of the small bowel. NCGS we is not autoimmune and we know less about it's true nature. But we do know it is considerably more common than celiac disease.
    • trents
      @Mark Conway, here is an article outlining the various tests that can be used to diagnose celiac disease. By far, the most popular one ordered by physicians is the tTG-IGA. But almost all of these tests are known by different names so the terminology will vary from place to place and lab to lab. The article gives common variant names for each test.  In addition to IGA tests there are IGG tests which are particularly useful in the case of IGA deficiency.  
    • JudyLou
      Thank you so much @knitty kitty! My feet aren’t dry or ashy and I don’t have a rash that gets scaly. It’s like very itchy/burning vesicles that are symmetrical - on both arms, both legs, etc. They actually feel better in direct sunlight as long as it isn’t really hot or I’m not exercising outside, but gets worse if I sweat (especially if the area is covered up). It’s not usually on the outside of my elbows and knees which seems more typical of dermatitis herpetiformis (unless it spreads there). It tends to first hit the inside of those areas. Interestingly, twice the rash broke out soon after eating an unhealthy meal and having an alcoholic drink (I only drink a few times a year, no more alcohol content than a glass of wine).  So I wonder if there is a connection. I’m halfway considering doing a gluten challenge for a few months to see what happens, knowing I can stop if I have any symptoms, and asking for a full celiac disease panel at the end. I really appreciate your thoughts! 
    • knitty kitty
      Welcome, @JudyLou, Your rash sounds very similar to the one I experienced.  Mine was due to a deficiency in Niacin B3, although I had deficiencies in other nutrients as well.  Celiac disease causes malabsorption of all the essential nutrients, but eating a poor diet, taking certain medications, or drinking alcohol can result in deficiency diseases outside of Celiac, too.  Symptoms can wax and wane depending on dietary intake.  I knew an alcoholic who had the "boots" of Pellagra, which would get worse when he was drinking more heavily, and improve when he was drinking less.   Niacin deficiency is called Pellagra.  Symptoms consist of dermatitis, diarrhea, dementia, and death (the four D's).  A scaly rash on the feet and hands and arms are called the "boots" and "gloves" of Pellagra.  Darkened skin around the neck exposed to the sun is Casal's necklace.  Poor farmers with niacin deficient diets were called "red necks" because of this.    Does your rash get worse if you're in the sun?  Mine did.  Any skin exposed to the sun got blistered and scaly.  Arms, legs, neck, head.  Do you have dry, ashy skin on your feet?  The itchiness was not only from the rash, but neuropathy.   My doctors were clueless.  They didn't put all my symptoms together into the three D's.  But I did.  I'd learned about Pellagra at university.  But there weren't supposed to be deficiency diseases anymore in the developed world.  Doubtful it could be that simple, I started supplementing with Niacin and other essential nutrients.  I got better.   One of Niacinamide functions is to help stop mast cells from releasing histamine.  Your allergist gave you doxepin, an antihistamine which stops mast cells from releasing histamine.   Since you do have a Celiac gene, staying on the gluten free diet can prevent Celiac disease from being triggered again.   Interesting Reading: These case studies have pictures... Pellgra revisited.  https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4228662/ Steroid-Resistant Rash With Neuropsychiatric Deterioration and Weight Loss: A Modern-Day Case of Pellagra https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12532421/#:~:text=Figure 2.,(right panel) upper limbs.&text=The distribution of the rash,patient's substantial response to treatment.   Cutaneous signs of nutritional disorders https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8721081/#:~:text=Additional causes of yellow skin,the clinical features of Kwashiorkor.   Hello, @Staticgypsy, I would not recommend cutting so many nutritious foods out of ones diet.  Oxalates can cause problems like kidney stones, but our bodies can process oxalates out of our systems with certain vitamins like Vitamins A and D and Pyridoxine B 6.   People with Celiac disease are often low in fat soluble vitamins A and D, as well as the water soluble B vitamins like Pyridoxine B 6.  Focus on serving your granddaughter nutrient dense meals to ensure she gets essential vitamins and minerals that will help her grow. Micronutrient inadequacy and urinary stone disease: an analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2018 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36976348/ Multivitamins co-intake can reduce the prevalence of kidney stones: a large-scale cross-sectional study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38564076/
    • Wheatwacked
      This doctor is obviously under educated about Celiac Disease. Deficiencies that can cause oral thrush (Candidiasis) mouth ulcers: Thiamine B1 B12 Folate Zinc Vitamin C B2 B6 Iron Malabsorption Syndrome is often co-morbid with Celiac Disease causing multiple deficiencies of the essential vitamins and minerals.  Low or deficient  Vitamin D is almost always found in undiagnosed Celiac Disease. "Over 900 genes have been reported as regulated by vitamin D"  Possible Role of Vitamin D in Celiac Disease Onset  "The overall prevalence rate of vitamin D deficiency was 41.6%, with the highest rate seen in blacks (82.1%), followed by Hispanics (69.2%)."    Prevalence and correlates of vitamin D deficiency in US adults
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.