Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Holding The Fda Responsible


JodiC

Recommended Posts

kenlove Rising Star

I agree fully, it's not just the canned stuff either. What goes into the cheese and milk is scary too.

I used to enjoy some processed cheese only to get glutened because they changed suppliers or formulas for making it.

Adding wheat to milk and ice cream was another big problem for me. When I go to the deli dept. I want to know whats in the cheese or meat I eat. Things being packaged in the store need to be labeled as well.

Ken

"Maybe we can't hold the "food industry" responsible but I believe the food all of us eat needs to change. "

The main issue I have with the food industry is 'truth in labeling'. I want food that is gluten free to either be gluten free by ingredients and manufacturing or to be labeled as 'made in a factory'. If it contains any gluten ingredients even below the level the government says we can take they should have to tell us and not allow the company to just leave it off the label and call it gluten-free. Personally I don't think that is too much to ask, they do it with peanuts.

I do wonder if something can be done about that. Companies should not be able to have copious lists of gluten free foods that are in reality a literal crap shoot for us to consume. Give us the info and let us choose whether to take the risk or not. Having had more than one GI bleed from a stupid bag of chips I can't say lawsuit has never crossed my mind.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



taweavmo3 Enthusiast
"Maybe we can't hold the "food industry" responsible but I believe the food all of us eat needs to change. "

The main issue I have with the food industry is 'truth in labeling'. I want food that is gluten free to either be gluten free by ingredients and manufacturing or to be labeled as 'made in a factory'. If it contains any gluten ingredients even below the level the government says we can take they should have to tell us and not allow the company to just leave it off the label and call it gluten-free. Personally I don't think that is too much to ask, they do it with peanuts.

I do wonder if something can be done about that. Companies should not be able to have copious lists of gluten free foods that are in reality a literal crap shoot for us to consume. Give us the info and let us choose whether to take the risk or not. Having had more than one GI bleed from a stupid bag of chips I can't say lawsuit has never crossed my mind.

This is my major qualm at the moment. Take the Rice Dream milk, which now says "gluten free" but it is still the same old formula, barley and all. Took a while to track that gluten source, b/c I didn't think I'd have to call and check a product that was labeled as being safe. So while I am thankful for the new labeling laws, this is a major kink that needs to be worked out.

blueeyedmanda Community Regular

I never knew there was wheat in regular old milk....is this true?

kenlove Rising Star

Sure is true in the Meadow Gold we get here in Hawaii. Not sure when it started but about a year ago I got glutened badly and to took awhile to figure out. Sure enough its on the label. for buttermilk and 1% regular milk.

ken

I never knew there was wheat in regular old milk....is this true?
blueeyedmanda Community Regular

Wow-never knew that thanks for sharing :) The regular vitamin D milk we get says gluten free on the bottle.

kenlove Rising Star

In some of the recipes my wife and I have, we started using yoghurt or regular milk. Neither one of us need the calories

but it sure beats the wheat in the other stuff.

We dont have much choice in Hawaii anymore.

take care

Ken

]\

Wow-never knew that thanks for sharing :) The regular vitamin D milk we get says gluten free on the bottle.
tom Contributor
. . . . I'm amazed at how much easier it is to be a Celiac now compared to 3+ years ago when I was diagnosed...there is a lot more awareness, more companies and restaurants recognize it, and the Food Allergen Labeling law was passed. I think its pretty darn impressive.

That's one heckuva good point!

I'm at 4yrs of 100% gluten-free this month and was something like 95-99% gluten-free for several yrs before that.

It WAS much harder. Almost every gluten-free product I see now didn't exist then. (Not counting naturally gluten-free - broccoli hasn't changed)

Even worse was going dairy-free before the Top8 Allergen law came around.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ryebaby0 Enthusiast
Wow-never knew that thanks for sharing :) The regular vitamin D milk we get says gluten free on the bottle.

This is a perfect example of why the FDA and food organizations are against labelling. My dairy can label my milk gluten-free because ALL milk (yes, ALL regular ol' nothing added to it like buttermilk) IS gluten free. But another dairy might not do that, and resent the competition and additional expense of "advertising" something that occurs naturally. So a bunch of laws are made, regulations passed, advisors and inspectors hired, and now my milk --- which is identical to the previous, unregulated, uninspected or labelled milk -- costs even MORE. How does that help? Price and consumers drive the market, whether we like it or not.

Be careful what you wish for. One of the immediate results of the '07 Big 8 labelling laws was companies deliberately adding gluten to their recipe, rather than risk a supplier "glutenating" their food and getting sued by some indigant celiac who thinks it's his/her right to rely on labels alone and won't accept that mistakes happen. So things that were once gluten-free if you read and researched are now clearly NOT gluten-free. I read a lot of celiac lists where people insist on 100% reliability in food (which won't happen, even in most of our own kitchens), complete accountability by companies, all while still retaining some perceived right to sue the company for human error. (Think McDonald's)

Corporations identify gluten when it profits them. If we are shrill, insistant, unforgiving and unrealistic, not to mention cheap, they have no motivation to do so. Is gluten-free food expensive? You betcha! Is that unfair? No. Is it more fair to underpay the guys who make it? So they become the people who can't afford their groceries?

Okay, I'm off my soapbox. See what happens when you are busy cooking?:)

joanna

blueeyedmanda Community Regular

I shop at a grocery store who labels all their house brands gluten free, and you can always call and get answers to questions. They are very knowledgable and willing to help. Does it profit it them? Their products are being purchased, but since they are under a generic name they are not as expensive as some things. I trust them and have never had a problem. What made them start this procedure was many celiac's emailing them and asking for help. Now they have a very big loyal base of customers, many who are celiacs.

ryebaby0 Enthusiast

Yes,it profits them, since I assume these loyal customers are purchasing things. My point was if you want gluten-free labelling, we are the ones "responsible" for using our power through purchasing;it's not the FDA or some regulatory system or grocery chains. Little companies have a lot to gain. Big ones, not so much. (I myself am a regular at our local health food store, which saw a similar demand -- through purchases and requests --- and is filling it responsibly and very well!)

blueeyedmanda Community Regular

I am not sure the FDA will help much, from what I have read, they are going to make the gluten free labeling more difficult. I feel for those just learning the labels, if it is rough now...

We have this great gluten free store near us (40 mins away) I used to go a lot but with gas prices sky-rocketing, I have had to cut back trips, and sometimes I mail order things too. I love that place, the owners are great and very involved with the local GIG.

Well, time to head off to find some lunch...snow is falling again

  • 2 weeks later...
WW340 Rookie

Our dollars will speak louder than anything else. As our numbers grow, so will the products available to us. This is already happening.

My buying habits have changed a lot since going gluten free. I used to be a name brand shopper. I also avoided Walmart whenever possible, for a lot of reasons. However, Walmart is now my one of my first places to shop because they have the labeling rule for all of their great value products. Now I buy the great value products because of the labeling.

I also stick to the major brands that cooperate with us on their labeling like Kraft. This all translates into dollars for those companies. Eventually, when enough of us are supporting these companies, the others will start looking at what the diffence is. They will eventually conclude that it is worth the effort to label things clearly if they are gluten free.

I personally hated to see McDonald's get sued for the gluten free french fry debacle. It sets our cause back when companies are being sued for attempting to let us know what is gluten free in their product lines. Ryebaby is correct, there is going to be instances of human error. If we always bring down the hammer in the form of lawsuits, companies will take the blanket cover your butt stance and simply say they cannot guarrantee something is gluten free.

We need to keep calling companies, thanking companies, and educating everyone we can.

blueeyedmanda Community Regular
Our dollars will speak louder than anything else. As our numbers grow, so will the products available to us. This is already happening.

My buying habits have changed a lot since going gluten free. I used to be a name brand shopper. I also avoided Walmart whenever possible, for a lot of reasons. However, Walmart is now my one of my first places to shop because they have the labeling rule for all of their great value products. Now I buy the great value products because of the labeling.

I also stick to the major brands that cooperate with us on their labeling like Kraft. This all translates into dollars for those companies. Eventually, when enough of us are supporting these companies, the others will start looking at what the diffence is. They will eventually conclude that it is worth the effort to label things clearly if they are gluten free.

I personally hated to see McDonald's get sued for the gluten free french fry debacle. It sets our cause back when companies are being sued for attempting to let us know what is gluten free in their product lines. Ryebaby is correct, there is going to be instances of human error. If we always bring down the hammer in the form of lawsuits, companies will take the blanket cover your butt stance and simply say they cannot guarrantee something is gluten free.

We need to keep calling companies, thanking companies, and educating everyone we can.

I used to be brand-loyal too, and I would occasionaly go to Wegmans when I wanted chinese or fruit. Once going gluten free I wanted to check out the natural section. I was blown away by the gluten free stuff. I then researched more and found their gluten free labeling on house brands....Now it is the main grocery store I shop in. Funny how things change.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    2. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
    • trents
      I don't know of a connection. Lots of people who don't have celiac disease/gluten issues get shingles.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.