Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

All Tests Negative?!

BallardWA

By BallardWA
in Coping with Celiac Disease

Recommended Posts

BallardWA Rookie
BallardWA
Posted

I heard from my doctor on Friday, and have found out that all my tests (celiac, gliaden, allergy) have come back negative, BUT - he says- that does not mean that I am not allergic to wheat! Great. Now what? I have been gluten free for 8 weeks, and with a few setbacks, have to say that my symptoms (serious stomach pain, acid reflux) have pretty much cleared up. Dare I eat bread? Has anyone else had all negative tests? If so, what good are they? They cost over $1,000. It seems that everyone agrees that the serum celiac test is useless, but the allergy panel, too?

Any input would be appreciated.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Ursa Major Collaborator
Ursa Major
Posted

Did you have the testing done AFTER you were gluten-free for a few weeks? If the answer is yes, then the testing was utterly useless and doesn't mean a thing. Because for the test results to be valid, you have to be eating gluten every day, and can't start the diet until after the blood is drawn.

It seems to me that your results are false negatives. What a waste of money! At least your doctor is partially right. Just because your test results were negative doesn't mean that you don't have celiac disease.

That your health problems are clearing up on the gluten-free diet really is all the proof you need. Keep up with the gluten-free diet, obviously you can't tolerate gluten.

So, no, please do yourself a favour and don't eat regular bread.

Since celiac disease isn't an allergy, allergy testing is useless for a gluten intolerance.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted
Has anyone else had all negative tests? If so, what good are they?

Yup. Over and over. But no doctor ever suggested the diet. Up to 30% of us will have negative blood tests, even if almost dead.

Go with your gut.

elye Community Regular
elye
Posted

This is a timely thread, as I just posted yesterday about my husband, who just had a high level of the three gluten antibodies detected in his stool, along with an excessively high fecal fat count, through the Enterolab fecal test. This is after a "very negative" blood panel result, and "negative" biopsy findings. Next to dietary response, which I believe is the most accurate diagnotic tool around, the stool test is probably the most accurate of the tests that can be run to detect gluten intolerance.

BallardWA Rookie
BallardWA
Posted
  • Author

Did you have the testing done AFTER you were gluten-free for a few weeks?

YES- I was gluten-free for six weeks before the blood draw because the first sample got lost!

The doctor insisted that he could still tell if I was gluten intolerant because it takes much longer for the antibodies to leave the blood - huh? Maybe I am being taken for a ride. This is a very frustrating process, and I can't understand why there is no concrete way to diagnose this thing (other than the wait-and-see variety).

dbmamaz Explorer
dbmamaz
Posted

I also got a negative celiac panel after being off wheat for 6 weeks, but definitely felt a lot better. It really threw me for a loop. However, I had also ordered a blood test from A.L.C.A.T (you can look them up on line, but if you spell it out here without the dots it will get changed .. ), when I'd been off wheat for 2 weeks. I showed sensitive to gluten, casien and candida, as well as about 50 foods. Now i'm on the elimination diet from hell . ..

Anyways, if you doubt that going off wheat was responsible for your symptoms, you could always eat a piece of bread and see what happens - I read one woman said she didnt believe she had problems after all, so she went out for pizza, and was so sick that night she's been gluten free ever since!

Everyone raves about the enterolabs test - it may be more accurate than the one I took, but mine tested for more different foods and didnt involve poo . . . lol

loraleena Contributor
loraleena
Posted

Your doc is so wrong. You have to be eating gluten for those tests to show anything. You'll have to eat gluten and get tested or you could get a stool test through Enterolabs which you can be gluten free for. Do you feel better gluten free? That may be enough answer for you. You could try it again and see if you have a reaction.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


JNBunnie1 Community Regular
JNBunnie1
Posted
Your doc is so wrong. You have to be eating gluten for those tests to show anything. You'll have to eat gluten and get tested or you could get a stool test through Enterolabs which you can be gluten free for. Do you feel better gluten free? That may be enough answer for you. You could try it again and see if you have a reaction.

You would have to be eating gluten for at least six weeks, is my understanding. It's not worth it. I'm not diagnosed, I had a negative biopsy too. But If you feel better, do you really need a test?

Genie75 Rookie
Genie75
Posted

Hi there,

All my tests are always negative as well. I've had the small bowel biopsy twice now, the blood tests, the allergy test. Always negative. Unfortunately, no-one told me that didn't mean I wasn't Celiac. That lead me to misundertstand, and eat glutens whenever I was "better', and then get sick again. What I finally learned is that I have to eat the glutens for 6 weeks to 2 months before the tests to get positive results on them (my doctors told me 1 to 2 weeks but the Celiac assocation informed me that a min of 6 weeks). I cannot do that cause I will be too sick.

So I'm learning to accept that I will never have a diagnosis from the doctors in my entire life, and that I am "self diagnosed". I had a hard time dealing with that. I am now past that though, and have accepted it. I have now gone gluten free for the rest of my life, as I am too sick otherwise.

Take good care of youself, and if you know they make you sick, stay away from them.

Best wishes, Janet

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,677
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    shayansh
    Newest Member
    shayansh
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.