Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

More Confusion And Frustration


jeannine

Recommended Posts

jeannine Apprentice

I have been seeing a dermatologist for a rash that I believe to be DH. The doc doesn't know what it is. The rash has been around for over a year and I've been seeing the derm for 8 months. He finally added my history to my rash and sent me to a gastroenterologist. I talked to a MD, resident and PA while there. They looked at my history but not so much at the rash and decided to do a liver biopsy (my AMA is off the charts) and a biopsy for celiac.

The MD said there is no way that I could have celiac because I'm not a "classic" case. The resident just said that I was interesting. The PA said that she is sure I have celiac and the biopsy will be definitve.

Ok, my problems are- fear that the biopsy will be normal (which sounds strange, but unless I get something that actually helps the rash I am going to go completely insane). And the PA told me to eat lots of gluten before the biopsy. Well, I'm as sick as a dog- I hadn't completely given up gluten, but now I'm eating a ton and have lost 12 lbs in less than a week and I don't spend a lot of time outside of the bathroom or bed. I'm 80 lbs- I guess 68 lbs now!- overweight, so part of that doesn't bother me so much.

What happens if the biopsy comes back negative? I've read a lot of stories here of biopsies being negative because they hit a "healthy" spot. Does everything just end there? Or do I go back and start everything all over?

There is a family history with celiac and other autoimmune disorders.

Thanks!

Jeannine


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kitten37 Newbie

I share your frustration and I totally understanding you wanting the results to say SOMETHING. I've gone through my life in constant discomfort and with a wide array of "strange" medical ailments all of which have no conclusion. Ever test comes back fine to the point where you start to think you might actually be losing your mind or possibly manifesting things. I even asked my doc that one and he said no way. So if your not crazy then there must be something. I'm not totally convinced in the western medical practices because I just figure I know that the majority of peolpe do not go through life in pain like this. So just keep pushing til you get your answers.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

What happens if the biopsy shows up negative is that you go gluten free anyway. The skin rash will take a while to resolve totally and even small amounts of gluten, even in your toiletries will keep it active. It should however improve quite a bit as soon as you stop reinjesting gluten. The truest test of whether you will benefit from the diet is doing it strictly after you are done with all the testing you want to go through. That is really the best way to make a final determination.

cupid Newbie

Hi, My biopsy came back negative and your right if they don't get an infected section then its inconclusive. If celiac runs in your family you may want to get the DQ2 & DQ8 DNA testing to see if you carry the gene. I get my DNA results tomorrow and probably sad to say but really hope its positive so I can finally have some answers. Started gluten-free day after testing and feeling somewhat better but its only been a little over a wk so looking forward big improvements. Good luck!

jeannine Apprentice

Well, another day another 2 pounds! :blink:

After the biopsy, I am going to go gluten-free- really gluten-free (not the half-baked job I was doing). This is just crazy, losing so much weight so quickly, feeling like crud, and the rash is everywhere but my face now!

I am now sick enough to know that even if my tests come back negative, I have to do something! It is up to me and not some doc reading some lab report.

Thanks for your responses!

Jeannine

aikiducky Apprentice

Has your dermatologist biopsied the rash? A skin biopsy would show whether or not it is dermatitis herpetiformis (hope I spelled that right!) and if you have DH you have celiac. Of course the dermatologist would have to be a little bit knowledgeable about DH to make a correct interpretation of the biopsy, so that is a concern...

Pauliina

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,203
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sarahmegan
    Newest Member
    Sarahmegan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.