Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten-free Poultry (chicken, Turkeys)


SEAliac

Recommended Posts

SEAliac Rookie

My mother-in-law talked to our local butcher about gluten-free turkeys. He suggested Bell and Evans brand. I just called them and talked to a woman named Jen. She assured me that they don't add anything to their birds so they are gluten-free. All their chicken and turkey leaves their packaging facility as fresh poultry. They may freeze some of it in a separate freezer room before shipping, but they don't add anything to the meat that would be problematic. The butcher was absolutely right!

The website showed that they even have a few types of breaded tenders and nuggest that are made using rice flour so they are gluten-free as well. This is now my favorite brand of poultry!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lovegrov Collaborator

Read the ingredients on any chicken or turkey. Gluten grains must be listed if included.

richard

SEAliac Rookie
Read the ingredients on any chicken or turkey. Gluten grains must be listed if included.

richard

I don't mean to be critical, but I think you may be misinformed. My understanding of the FDA's requirement for labeling is that "wheat", as one of the Big 8 allergens, must be listed. I haven't seen anything yet published by the FDA that says rye, barley, and oats must be listed as well. The appellation "gluten-free" is only voluntary; so if something has in it rye or barley derivatives that contain the gluten proteins, then the manufacturer isn't required to list it. Likewise, even if the manufacturer hasn't added anything WRBO, they don't have to label the item gluten-free. That is what scares me every time I see "natural flavorings" such as may be included in the broth injected into some poultry. Unless the label states gluten-free, I don't know that "natural flavorings" are safe. Two incidents in the last two months with rapid-onset symptoms after I ate chicken have convinced me to check each brand.

Lisa Mentor
I don't mean to be critical, but I think you may be misinformed. My understanding of the FDA's requirement for labeling is that "wheat", as one of the Big 8 allergens, must be listed. I haven't seen anything yet published by the FDA that says rye, barley, and oats must be listed as well. The appellation "gluten-free" is only voluntary; so if something has in it rye or barley derivatives that contain the gluten proteins, then the manufacturer isn't required to list it. Likewise, even if the manufacturer hasn't added anything WRBO, they don't have to label the item gluten-free. That is what scares me every time I see "natural flavorings" such as may be included in the broth injected into some poultry. Unless the label states gluten-free, I don't know that "natural flavorings" are safe. Two incidents in the last two months with rapid-onset symptoms after I ate chicken have convinced me to check each brand.

I believe that the USDA requires that ALL grains be labeled in meats and poultry. It is separate from the FDA Labeling Law.

(someone else can provide a supporting link)

ravenwoodglass Mentor
I believe that the USDA requires that ALL grains be labeled in meats and poultry. It is separate from the FDA Labeling Law.

(someone else can provide a supporting link)

Here it is:

Open Original Shared Link

Unfortunately we are still at risk from both barley malt used as a natural flavoring and unlike with FDA regulations, modified food starch does not have to be identified as a to source. When we see natual flavors or modified food starch added to meats we do need to check the safety for us. Hydrolized protein and actual grain does need to be declared.

MODIFIED FOOD STARCH - starch that has been chemically altered to improve its thickening properties. Before the starch is modified, it is separated from the protein through isolation techniques; therefore, the source of the starch used is not required on the label.

What are Labeling Requirements for Additives?

The statutes and regulations to enforce the statutes require certain information on labels of meat and poultry products so consumers will have complete information about a product. In all cases, ingredients must be listed on the product label, in the ingredients statement in order by weight, from the greatest amount to the least.

Substances such as spices and spice extractives may be declared as "natural flavors," "flavors," or "natural flavoring" on meat and poultry labels without naming each one. This is because they are used primarily for their flavor contribution and not their nutritional contribution.

Substances such as dried meat, poultry stock, meat extracts, or hydrolyzed protein must be listed on the label by their common or usual name because their primary purpose is not flavor. They may be used as flavor enhancers, binders, or emulsifiers. They must be labeled using the species of origin of the additive, for example, dried beef, chicken stock, pork extract, or hydrolyzed wheat protein.

Color additives must be declared by their common or usual names on labels, e.g., FD&C Yellow 5, or annatto extract, not collectively as colorings. These labeling requirements help consumers make choices about the foods they eat.

SEAliac Rookie

Here it is:

Open Original Shared Link

Thank you! As your answers always are, this is informative and much appreciated.

lovegrov Collaborator

When I've called the USDA they've told me that ANY grain MUST be listed because it adds nutritive value. I have been told specifically that barley has to be listed.

richard


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,202
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PatBurnham
    Newest Member
    PatBurnham
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.