Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Misleading gluten-free Labelling At Whole Foods


NicoleAJ

Recommended Posts

NicoleAJ Enthusiast

These reporters at the Chicago Tribune seemed to be well informed about their research into allergy labelling. I still trust the gluten free bakehouse products because they are produced in a gluten-free facility, but I'll definitely think twice before buying some of the 360 Everyday WF products that say that they use good manufacturing practices to segregate products in the same facility.

I was particularly surprised at the level of gluten found in Wellshire farms products-- up to 1200 ppms in the "gluten free" hot dogs!

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



DarkIvy Explorer

Ugh, that's so scary.

I'm so glad the Chicago Tribune is bringing a bit of light to this topic, though. That's huge!

I've been wondering about some of the Whole Foods stuff for a while. It's a little bit misleading, as some of the stuff is marked gluten-free, but then you read the label and it may not necessarily be gluten-free. For a while, one of the WF I go to had gluten-free muffins baked fresh every day... in their bakery full of wheat and sitting right next to the gluteny muffins on the bakery shelf. I had some employee try to convince me that they were safe but I said I'd pass.

The article pointed out something I've been wondering for a while myself: how does one interpret labels that say something "may" contain x and y ingredients? Stronger labeling would be nice. I understand that companies may not always know for sure, but a "may or may not" statement is going to deter someone with celiac or severe allergies anyway, so they might as well be more honest. Even "this product is very likely to contain x and y" or "not suitable for folks with the following allergens: ___" would be nice. It's almost like the "may contain" is so non-commital that it really can be interpreted either way. They absolutely should be more clear.

Also, I think it would be nice if they could list barely, oats, and rye more clearly, too. Just because something is "wheat free" doesn't mean it is gluten free, as we all know, and I'm always wondering what's what.

darlindeb25 Collaborator

Here is the second part of the article. It focuses on Whole Foods practice of using the label "Good manufacturing practices,were used to segregate" potential allergens such as tree nuts, soy or milk".

Open Original Shared Link

Wheat dust in the tortilla plant "is really impossible to segregate" from non-wheat products, McCabe said.

Bueno cleans equipment and uses separate assembly lines for different products, he said. But wheat dust is so tiny and prevalent at the plant, he added, that "I could be breathing in wheat dust right now, and I'm two buildings away, in an office."

But the Tribune found that many tortillas currently for sale have neither warning stickers nor new packaging with the proper language

happygirl Collaborator

Same article - merged the two threads together.

darlindeb25 Collaborator

I had not seen Nicole's thread, sorry. The forum is very irratic as of late, wouldn't open again this morning for a time. I would have joined hers had I seen it first.

Thank you happygirl!

darlindeb25 Collaborator

Open Original Shared Link

Feedburner is a great program. Click on the link, then scroll down to the Chicago Tribune, and you can listen to Steve and Johnnie (Steve is a celiac too), interview the writer of the article. It's in 3 parts, and very interesting.

happygirl Collaborator

related article and statement from Glutino: Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



NicoleAJ Enthusiast

Thanks Deb for posting the radio interview--it was really interesting to hear the journalist's view and hear such great press for awareness of intolerances and food allergies.

JNBunnie1 Community Regular
Thanks Deb for posting the radio interview--it was really interesting to hear the journalist's view and hear such great press for awareness of intolerances and food allergies.

Have I mentioned I'm never buying anything from Wellshire Farms again?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,806
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    JBeckmon
    Newest Member
    JBeckmon
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Russ H
      The anti-endomysial antibody test is an old test that is generally reported as positive or negative - a lab technician looks down a microscope to check for fluorescence of the sample. It is less sensitive but more specific for coeliac disease than IgA tTG2. Hence, it is not "barely positive" - it is positive. People diagnosed in childhood recover much more quickly than adults.  I would look at testing all 1st degree relatives - parents, siblings.
    • xxnonamexx
      What about digestive enzymes that I hear help? I take align 5x probiotics daily.
    • Samanthaeileen1
      thank you RMJ! That is very helpful advice. Good to know we aren’t crazy if we don’t do the endoscopy. We are going to try the gluten free and see how symptoms and levels improve.    thank you Wheatwacked (love the username lol) that is also reassuring. Thankfully she has an amazing and experienced pediatrician. And yesss I forgot to mention the poop! She has the weirdest poop issues.    How long did it take y'all to start seeing improvement in symptoms? 
    • Wheatwacked
      My son was diagnosed when he was weaned in 1976 after several endoscopies.  Given your two year old's symptoms and your family history and your pediatrition advocating for the dx, I would agree.  Whether an endoscopy is positive or negative is irrelevant.   That may happen even with endoscopy.  Pick your doctors with that in mind. In the end you save the potential trauma of the endoscopy for your baby.   Mine also had really nasty poop.  His doctor started him on Nutramigen Infant because at the time it was the only product that was hypo allergenic and had complete nutrition. The improvement was immediate.
    • RMJ
      So her tissue transglutaminase antibody is almost 4x the upper end of the normal range - likely a real result. The other things you can do besides an endoscopy would be: 1.  Genetic testing.  Unfortunately a large proportion of the population has genes permissive for celiac disease, but only a small proportion of those with the genes have it. With family history it is likely she has the genes. 2.  Try a gluten free diet and see if the symptoms go away AND the antibody levels return to normal. (This is what I would do). Endoscopies aren’t always accurate in patients as young as your daughter. Unfortunately, without an endoscopy, some doctor later in her life may question whether she really has celiac disease or not, and you’ll need to be a fierce mama bear to defend the diagnosis! Be sure you have a good written record of her current pediatrician’s diagnosis. Doing a gluten challenge for an endoscopy later in life could cause a very uncomfortable level of symptoms.   Having yourself, your husband and your son tested would be a great idea.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.