Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Follow-up Biopsy Report


newceliac

Recommended Posts

newceliac Enthusiast

I was diagnosed with celiac disease a little over a year ago. I felt better initially but then began having similar problems. My problems are still much better than during the many years prior to diagnosis but I am just not feeling like I think I should after 1 year gluten free.

I was still having problems with cramping, bloating, constipation, fatigue,etc. (in the meantime I had changed GI docs because the initial dr. who diagnosed me basically said to get on the internet and research celiac disease and stop eating gluten.) My initial biopsy which was done after positve blood test results found moderate to subtotal villous atrophy.

The new dr. decided to do a follow up scope since I was still having some problems. They called me today with the results. The results said "partially treated celiac disease". The nurse didn't really know any other details besides that.

I am confused by this. I have been trying so hard to be gluten free. Could it be that I am just not totally healed......or have I possibly still been getting gluten somehow.......or is it possible that other food intolerances are possibly causing me to not be totally healed? This is so frustrating. I guess "partially treated celiac" is better than moderate to subtotal villous atrophy but it is still frustrating.

I think I may have a casein intolerance, however I am not totally diligent in making sure I don't consume products with casein.

I also had mild to moderate gastritis.

I have a follow up appt in 3 weeks. Does anyone have any insight or information on what "partially treated celiac disease" means. Or any advice on questions I should ask the dr.

Thanks in advance.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

It means gluten is sneaking in somewhere. Have you checked all your toiletries, lotions, shampoos and such for gluten? Do you eat out frequently, consume much gluten free but 'made in a facility that processes gluten' foods, or do you have a mixed household? Have you checked all your supplements, meds both OTC and script with either the company that makes them or with your pharmacist? Do you do home remodeling or a lot of crafts? Many things used there are not gluten free like glues, clays, drywall compound, paints? Do you have a pet that consumes gluten food?

ang1e0251 Contributor

It can be really sneaky this gluten. I found it in my spice cabinet, things I thought were OK had been replaced with a brand that wasn't. The syrups for my coffee looked OK but turned out the caramel coloring in that particular brand had gluten. I ate sweetener and didn't check the package, yep, it was cut with wheat.

I have a mixed kitchen and it works for me but I've read other posters say they couldn't get healthy until they banned the gluten from their house.

I hope this helps you find your hidden gluten. It's not fun to still be sick when you feel you are doing everything right.

Gfresh404 Enthusiast
I was diagnosed with celiac disease a little over a year ago. I felt better initially but then began having similar problems. My problems are still much better than during the many years prior to diagnosis but I am just not feeling like I think I should after 1 year gluten free.

I was still having problems with cramping, bloating, constipation, fatigue,etc. (in the meantime I had changed GI docs because the initial dr. who diagnosed me basically said to get on the internet and research celiac disease and stop eating gluten.) My initial biopsy which was done after positve blood test results found moderate to subtotal villous atrophy.

The new dr. decided to do a follow up scope since I was still having some problems. They called me today with the results. The results said "partially treated celiac disease". The nurse didn't really know any other details besides that.

I am confused by this. I have been trying so hard to be gluten free. Could it be that I am just not totally healed......or have I possibly still been getting gluten somehow.......or is it possible that other food intolerances are possibly causing me to not be totally healed? This is so frustrating. I guess "partially treated celiac" is better than moderate to subtotal villous atrophy but it is still frustrating.

I think I may have a casein intolerance, however I am not totally diligent in making sure I don't consume products with casein.

I also had mild to moderate gastritis.

I have a follow up appt in 3 weeks. Does anyone have any insight or information on what "partially treated celiac disease" means. Or any advice on questions I should ask the dr.

Thanks in advance.

I had almost the exact same symptoms. It started off as gastritis and then realized something in milk was bothering (not lactose) me. Now gluten and dairy free and feeling so much better.

But I did test negative for both the blood test and the biopsy, so I'm going to get retested. But I do believe that it takes a while for the villi to heal, I've heard somewhere from 3 to 6 months. So maybe, just give it some time.

ksymonds84 Enthusiast

Sorry that your still having problems. I am not sure of your age, but I read in Dr. Green's book, I believe it was called "Celiac, the Hidden Epidemic" that it can take up to two years to heal in adults. I am a little over a year and although much better, still dealing with lactose intolerance etc. Of course be diligent on finding hidden gluten, but you just may need more time to heal.

Gemini Experienced
Sorry that your still having problems. I am not sure of your age, but I read in Dr. Green's book, I believe it was called "Celiac, the Hidden Epidemic" that it can take up to two years to heal in adults. I am a little over a year and although much better, still dealing with lactose intolerance etc. Of course be diligent on finding hidden gluten, but you just may need more time to heal.

I agree totally with you! People focus too much on gluten but it sounds like new celiac may have other intolerances as well, and these can cause villous atrophy. It is not always a gluten problem.

Dr. Green's book was excellent and one every Celiac should read. It covers many of the questions I see posted here all the time and gives up to date, excellent explanations and answers.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,205
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Butch68
    Newest Member
    Butch68
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.