Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing For Celiac

samanthaw

Recommended Posts

samanthaw Newbie
samanthaw
Posted

Hello All,

Like many of you, I am struggling to determine if I have celiac disease. I recently saw my general practitioner for a "well woman" exam -- I had complaints of fatigue, depression -- just not feeling like myself. She ran blood tests including ferritin levels and determined that I was anemic. I then underwent an endoscopy and colonoscopy to make sure I wasn't bleeding internally (I'm 42 years old). The colonoscopy was clear but the endoscopy revealed "mild villous atrophy with intraepithelial lymphocytes consistent with celiac disease". The GI then ran antibody blood tests, which he said were negative for celiac disease. I have not heard back on the results of the gene testing. He now wants me to wait about 3 months and do another endoscopy to see if the results are the same. He does not seem to want to diagnose celiac disease and downplays the illness thinking it is the "popular" disease of the day.

My question to all of you is had anyone had similiar test results and if so, did your doctor diagnose you with celiac disease? Can a person have the results that I had from the small bowel biopsy and not have celiac disease?

Any help provided will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks, Sabrina

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted
Hello All,

Like many of you, I am struggling to determine if I have celiac disease. I recently saw my general practitioner for a "well woman" exam -- I had complaints of fatigue, depression -- just not feeling like myself. She ran blood tests including ferritin levels and determined that I was anemic. I then underwent an endoscopy and colonoscopy to make sure I wasn't bleeding internally (I'm 42 years old). The colonoscopy was clear but the endoscopy revealed "mild villous atrophy with intraepithelial lymphocytes consistent with celiac disease". The GI then ran antibody blood tests, which he said were negative for celiac disease. I have not heard back on the results of the gene testing. He now wants me to wait about 3 months and do another endoscopy to see if the results are the same. He does not seem to want to diagnose celiac disease and downplays the illness thinking it is the "popular" disease of the day.

My question to all of you is had anyone had similar test results and if so, did your doctor diagnose you with celiac disease? Can a person have the results that I had from the small bowel biopsy and not have celiac disease?

Any help provided will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks, Sabrina

Please get a new doctor, one that is knowledgeable and one that doesn't downplay the facts.

Your villous atrophy IS consistent with Celiac Disease and IS considered a diagnosis.

Testing for Celiac can render false negatives but never false positives. Coupled with a positive dietary response, it's a pretty sure bet that you do have Celiac.

Welcome to the Club!

lizard00 Enthusiast
lizard00
Posted

As Momma Goose said, please get another opinion.

Many people can test negative with the blood testing, but the biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosis, especially when the blood tests are negative.

Tallforagirl Rookie
Tallforagirl
Posted
Your villous atrophy IS consistent with Celiac Disease and IS considered a diagnosis.

Testing for Celiac can render false negatives but never false positives. Coupled with a positive dietary response, it's a pretty sure bet that you do have Celiac.

There can be other causes for villous atrophy, so do make sure your doctor rules out any other causes before diagnosing celiac disease. Since you don't have positive blood panel results it may not pay to jump to conclusions before checking out all possibilities.

Other causes of villous atrophy include:

"Cow

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Did this doctor tell you to go on the diet strictly and then he would rebiopsy or did he tell you to keep eating gluten? Some doctors are very reluctant to diagnose celiac and will tell us to keep on gluten until the villi are totally destroyed.

IMHO you should do the former. Go off of gluten strictly and then if symptoms have not resolved start looking for the 'other possible reasons' for the villi atrophy. Most of the other causes are things that can be related to celiac or that can be found in tandum with it.

In addition get your hands on the actual results from the blood tests along with the lab's ranges. There are doctors that will consider a low positive a negative and tell the patients the test was negative if the results were only a few points into the positive range. As for the gene tests do not consider it is a definte 'you don't have it' if you do not have DQ2 or 8. Those are the only celiac related genes that are tested for in the US. In other countries there are 7 others that are also celiac related but doctors here do not look for them.

samanthaw Newbie
samanthaw
Posted
  • Author
Did this doctor tell you to go on the diet strictly and then he would rebiopsy or did he tell you to keep eating gluten? Some doctors are very reluctant to diagnose celiac and will tell us to keep on gluten until the villi are totally destroyed.

IMHO you should do the former. Go off of gluten strictly and then if symptoms have not resolved start looking for the 'other possible reasons' for the villi atrophy. Most of the other causes are things that can be related to celiac or that can be found in tandum with it.

In addition get your hands on the actual results from the blood tests along with the lab's ranges. There are doctors that will consider a low positive a negative and tell the patients the test was negative if the results were only a few points into the positive range. As for the gene tests do not consider it is a definte 'you don't have it' if you do not have DQ2 or 8. Those are the only celiac related genes that are tested for in the US. In other countries there are 7 others that are also celiac related but doctors here do not look for them.

samanthaw Newbie
samanthaw
Posted
  • Author
Please get a new doctor, one that is knowledgeable and one that doesn't downplay the facts.

Your villous atrophy IS consistent with Celiac Disease and IS considered a diagnosis.

Testing for Celiac can render false negatives but never false positives. Coupled with a positive dietary response, it's a pretty sure bet that you do have Celiac.

Welcome to the Club!

Thanks Lisa and I do plan to get a new doctors that hopefully specializes in patients with Celiad Disease.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


samanthaw Newbie
samanthaw
Posted
  • Author
There can be other causes for villous atrophy, so do make sure your doctor rules out any other causes before diagnosing celiac disease. Since you don't have positive blood panel results it may not pay to jump to conclusions before checking out all possibilities.

Other causes of villous atrophy include:

"Cow

samanthaw Newbie
samanthaw
Posted
  • Author
Did this doctor tell you to go on the diet strictly and then he would rebiopsy or did he tell you to keep eating gluten? Some doctors are very reluctant to diagnose celiac and will tell us to keep on gluten until the villi are totally destroyed.

IMHO you should do the former. Go off of gluten strictly and then if symptoms have not resolved start looking for the 'other possible reasons' for the villi atrophy. Most of the other causes are things that can be related to celiac or that can be found in tandum with it.

In addition get your hands on the actual results from the blood tests along with the lab's ranges. There are doctors that will consider a low positive a negative and tell the patients the test was negative if the results were only a few points into the positive range. As for the gene tests do not consider it is a definte 'you don't have it' if you do not have DQ2 or 8. Those are the only celiac related genes that are tested for in the US. In other countries there are 7 others that are also celiac related but doctors here do not look for them.

He told me to continue eating gluten I suppose with the thought that he would see if the problem cleared without a gluten-free diet and then he would assume I did not have celiac disease. However, I have read that symptoms of Celiac Disease can wax and wane. What I failed to ask him is what would he then recommend if the biopsy showed abnormal results. Would I then go on a gluten-free diet and undergo a third endoscopy????

I have requested the lab reports and hope to get them soon. I may ask for your IMHO again.

Thanks so much!!

happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted

You may want to post on the board asking for an experienced doctor in your area, or contact a local Celiac support group and ask who their members use.

You do not have to have positive bloodwork and biopsy for diagnosis.

It'll be interesting to see which bloodwork he ran.

Also, there is some research that indicates that "lesser" damage (mild) isn't often picked up on blood tests. The blood tests are generally more accurate with "more" damage.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,687
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Star123
    Newest Member
    Star123
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.