Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Which Is Starchier?


Eliza13

Recommended Posts

Eliza13 Contributor

It seems that of the 4 - rice, beans, corn, potatoes - I am best able to handle rice. Is rice the least starchy? I think beans may be causing me alot of problems, so I've let them go for now. Anyone know the answer to this?

Skar


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Emme999 Enthusiast

I think that the potatoes are definitely the starchiest! Beans would be the least starchy (is starchy a word? :blink: ) because they have protein in them. I think rice is probably the second least starchy one - because rice (if it's brown rice) actually has some protein in it also. I think corn is second only to potatoes in the starchiest contest.

Wow, I bet that was really confusing! Ha ha - even to me!

Anyway, this is what I mean:

(from least starchy to most)

- Beans

- Brown rice

- Corn

- Potatoes

Keep in mind that I don't really know what I'm talking about here ;) It's all theory!

Best wishes!

- Michelle :wub:

Carriefaith Enthusiast

Here is an interesting link!

Open Original Shared Link

Looks like potatoes are the starchiest!

Carriefaith Enthusiast

The reason why your body may not be able to tolerate starchy things is because gluten can damage the part of the intestine that breaks down starch.

Emme999 Enthusiast
The reason why your body may not be able to tolerate starchy things is because gluten can damage the part of the intestine that breaks down starch.

Really? :huh: I thought it damaged the part that digests fat.

Doesn't it just damage the whole freakin' thing? So far I've learned that the damage prevents absorption of nutrients, digestion of fat, and (now) that it prevents the breakdown of starch. So.. is there *anything* that our bodies can handle without problems? :unsure:

Please enlighten me!!

- Michelle :wub:

Carriefaith Enthusiast

It depends on the extent of the damage for each individual. Gluten damages the villi of the small intestine which are resposible for breaking down nutrients, fats, vitamins, ect. Gluten eventually flattens the villi making it hard to digest food.

However, enzymes which are responsible for breaking down lactose, sugar, and starch are also located in the villi. The lactose enzyme is at the tip of the villi (so many celiacs cannot tolerate dairy for awhile), the sugar enzyme is in the middle, and the starch enzyme is at the bottom.

So if your villi are flattened, then you may have problems digesting everything! :o

The good news is that the villi will heal :D (it is very rare if they don't heal) and you will be able to digest proporly again. But... is may take weeks or months for this to happen

pmrowley Newbie

Interesting that the chart that was linked to doesn't include GRAINS as part of the analysis!

Rice is the highest-density carbohydrate of any grain. (Notice that Rice Krispies are at the top of the list.) However, the fiber and proteins contained in brown rice also make it one of the most healthful (remember, beans and rice provides all required amino acids.)

Skarlet, try Quinoa out! High protein, low-density carbohydrate, VERY tasty! I like Quinoa pastas as well as Quinoa alone (it serves as a substitue for rice as a side dish.)

-Pat


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Emme999 Enthusiast

Thanks for the explanation Carrie :)

Not such happy news for me though, since my doctor told me last week that according to the biopsy my villi are flat :(

Carriefaith Enthusiast
Not such happy news for me though, since my doctor told me last week that according to the biopsy my villi are flat

Oh no :o Hopefully they won't need to much time to heal.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,023
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Tubbybooboo
    Newest Member
    Tubbybooboo
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Your experience is both shocking and critically important for the community to hear, underscoring the terrifying reality that cross-contamination can extend into the most unexpected and invasive medical devices. It is absolutely devastating that you had to endure six months of sickness and ultimately sustain permanent vision loss because a doctor dismissed your legitimate, life-altering condition. Your relentless research and advocacy, from discovering the gluten in MMA acrylic to finding a compassionate prosthodontist, is a testament to your strength in a system that often fails celiac patients. While the scientific and medical consensus is that gluten cannot be absorbed through the skin or eyes (as the molecules are too large to pass through these barriers), your story highlights a terrifying gray area: what about a substance *permanently implanted inside the body*, where it could potentially shed microparticles or cause a localized immune reaction? Your powerful warning about acrylic lenses and the drastic difference with the silicone alternative is invaluable information. Thank you for sharing your harrowing journey and the specific, severe neurological symptoms you endure; it is a stark reminder that celiac is a systemic disease, and your advocacy is undoubtedly saving others from similar trauma.
    • Scott Adams
      Those are driving distance from me--I will try to check them out, thanks for sharing!
    • Scott Adams
      I am so sorry you're going through this bad experience--it's difficult when your own lived reality of cause and effect is dismissed by the very professionals meant to help you. You are absolutely right—your violent physical reactions are not "what you think," but undeniable data points, and it's a form of medical gaslighting to be told otherwise, especially when you have a positive HLA-DQ2 gene and a clear clinical picture. Since your current "celiac specialist" is not addressing the core issue or your related conditions like SIBO and chronic fatigue, it may be time for a strategic pivot. Instead of trying to "reprove" your celiac disease to unwilling ears, consider seeking out a new gastroenterologist or functional medicine doctor, and frame the conversation around managing the complications of a confirmed gluten-free diet for celiac disease. Go in and say, "I have celiac disease, am strictly gluten-free, but I am still suffering from these specific complications: SIBO, chronic fatigue, dermatological issues, and high blood pressure linked to pain. I need a partner to help me address these related conditions." This shifts the focus from a debate about your diagnosis to a collaborative plan for your current suffering, which is the help you truly need and deserve to work toward bouncing back.
    • NanCel
      Hello, no I had to have them re done and then used a liner over the top.  Many dentists are not aware of the celiac effects.  Best of luck.   There is other material, yet, very expensive.
    • sleuth
      He is not just a psychiatrist.  He is also a neuroscientist.  And yes, I have already read those studies.   I agree with benfotiamine.  This is short term while glutened/inflammation occurs.  As I had already mentioned, these symptoms no longer exist when this phase passes.  And yes, I know that celiac is a disease of malnutrition.  We are working with a naturopath.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.