Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Too Old To Have Problems With Gluten


poopedout

Recommended Posts

poopedout Apprentice

My doctor told me this problem does not show up for the first time at my age and it occurs in much younger people. I am not sure if he meant celiac disease or gluten intolerance. I am 69 years old. I am wondering if any of you developed this problem at my age or if you were all much younger than I am when you started having problems.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jerseyangel Proficient

My doctor told me this problem does not show up for the first time at my age and it occurs in much younger people. I am not sure if he meant celiac disease or gluten intolerance. I am 69 years old. I am wondering if any of you developed this problem at my age or if you were all much younger than I am when you started having problems.

With all due respect, your doctor is mistaken. I was 49 when diagnosed--after being misdiagnosed for many years. The disease can be triggered at any time in one's life.

sa1937 Community Regular

My doctor told me this problem does not show up for the first time at my age and it occurs in much younger people. I am not sure if he meant celiac disease or gluten intolerance. I am 69 years old. I am wondering if any of you developed this problem at my age or if you were all much younger than I am when you started having problems.

Your doctor is just plain WRONG! I am older than you, had a positive celiac blood panel in Dec., consult with GI doc in late Feb. and was diagnosed with a positive biopsy on April 9. On my initial appt., I asked my GI doc if he didn't think I was a little old to have celiac to which he told me, "No".

It's sad that doctors are so ill-informed about this disease and don't think of testing for it. I believe my daughter also has celiac and quite some time ago, she asked her endocrinologist about it and he told her celiac is very rare. Thankfully he's a top-notch endocrinologist who has her thyroid totally under control for the first time. He's an older doctor so that probably explains why he thinks celiac is "rare".

skigirlchar Newbie

with all due respect (thank you jerseyangel for the appropriate words i just used) your doctor is an idiot.

there many of us have family links to gluten allergies or insensitivity that have never been diagnosed, but when you lay out the symptoms they are EXACTLY the same.

my grandmother, nor great grandmother, ever had a gluten insensitivity diagnosis. instead one had her gall bladder removed, both were told to not eat eggs, were told to cut salt from their diets, and were told to take iron pills.

i was even diagnosed w/ menieres at 25 - something TYPICALLY diagnosed in people in their 40's (though it has been removed since my dr's realized i had the gluten issues.)

heck, my mom is in her 60's and was only recently diagnosed w/ both asthma and a few allergies.

if you take a look at my symptoms and those each had in my family on my mom's side alarm bells start going off.

and as i take a closer and closer look, i really think my dad my have it.

you obviously don't agree w/ your dr since you are asking us...... i would say you probably are also asking us in a round about way if you should get a 2nd opinion..... and i have to say YES, find another dr.

nora-n Rookie

The finnish celiac researchers have studied celiac in old or elderly people, and actually the incidence of cleiac INCREASES with age.

Over 3% of them are celiacs.

So your doctor was educated some decades ago and did not re-educate himself.

He should be finding 3% celiacs amongst his 70-yrs olds if he just would bother to test them, as many are unsymptomatic.

poopedout Apprentice

The finnish celiac researchers have studied celiac in old or elderly people, and actually the incidence of cleiac INCREASES with age.

Over 3% of them are celiacs.

So your doctor was educated some decades ago and did not re-educate himself.

He should be finding 3% celiacs amongst his 70-yrs olds if he just would bother to test them, as many are unsymptomatic.

I thought he was probably wrong, but I wanted to see what people here had to say.

I cannot change doctors. This is Canada, after all.

psawyer Proficient

I cannot change doctors. This is Canada, after all.

You don't say where in Canada you are, but here in Ontario it is difficult but not impossible to change. I have done it three times in the last eight years.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



poopedout Apprentice

You don't say where in Canada you are, but here in Ontario it is difficult but not impossible to change. I have done it three times in the last eight years.

I am in Ontario in an area where no one is taking new patients. They especially will not accept anyone who already has a doctor.

weluvgators Explorer

You may want to start educating your doctor!

My latest reading is Fast Facts: Celiac Disease by Geoffrey Holmes, Carlo Catassi, Alesio Fasano, Second edition.

I bought the book specifically to give it to my doctors. In the Clinical manifestations section it has the following information on page 48,

Celiac disease is being increasingly diagnosed in later life and, today, about 25% of cases are diagnosed in patients over 60 years of age and 10% in those aged over 70 years. Contrary to common belief, 95% of the patients manage a GFD well and enjoy a much improved quality of life.

I think your doctor may need to update his understanding of celiac!

Skylark Collaborator

Bring him this article. It is a particularly powerful study because they followed people for a few years and a few people who were not celiac developed the disease.

Open Original Shared Link

It will look nicer if you use the PDF link at the top right-hand side of the page and print from that.

Generic Apprentice

My great-grandma was diagnosed at the ripe old age of 83. So no it is deffinetly wrong. Also

My mom was diagnosed via the gluten challenge at the age of 62.

poopedout Apprentice

Bring him this article. It is a particularly powerful study because they followed people for a few years and a few people who were not celiac developed the disease.

Open Original Shared Link

It will look nicer if you use the PDF link at the top right-hand side of the page and print from that.

Thanks for the article. It was very informative. It looks like celiac disease will not kill me. It might even make me healthier since my diet is much healthier now that I cannot eat foods containing gluten.

poopedout Apprentice

You may want to start educating your doctor!

My latest reading is Fast Facts: Celiac Disease by Geoffrey Holmes, Carlo Catassi, Alesio Fasano, Second edition.

I bought the book specifically to give it to my doctors. In the Clinical manifestations section it has the following information on page 48,

I think your doctor may need to update his understanding of celiac!

Thanks for the book recommendation. I will try to find it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,436
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Vivien Armstrong
    Newest Member
    Vivien Armstrong
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.