Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Blood Test, Negative Biopsy, But Vomit When I Eat Wheat Products


Jeffiner

Recommended Posts

Jeffiner Apprentice

This is going on seven years. I vomit on nearly a daily basis. My IgA level was slightly positive but my biopsy was negative. I have been eating gluten free and have not been vomiting. Today, I had two regular cookies and literally tossed them. I have an appt with an allergist next month to see if it is an allergy. Occasionally without gluten in my diet, I will vomit. It is not reflux. I get terribly nauseous and light headed ten minutes after eating, then throw up up to an hour later. I have even experienced shortness of breath, which makes me think allergy.......maybe? IDK I can't eat it, bottom line. I would like to know if it is an allergy or if it still could be celiac disease because the effects are different. My intestines were okay but I had a nasty looking esophagus. Thanks for any input.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



sb2178 Enthusiast

This is going on seven years. I vomit on nearly a daily basis. My IgA level was slightly positive but my biopsy was negative. I have been eating gluten free and have not been vomiting. Today, I had two regular cookies and literally tossed them. I have an appt with an allergist next month to see if it is an allergy. Occasionally without gluten in my diet, I will vomit. It is not reflux. I get terribly nauseous and light headed ten minutes after eating, then throw up up to an hour later. I have even experienced shortness of breath, which makes me think allergy.......maybe? IDK I can't eat it, bottom line. I would like to know if it is an allergy or if it still could be celiac disease because the effects are different. My intestines were okay but I had a nasty looking esophagus. Thanks for any input.

Sounds more like an allergy, but celiac shows up in many varied ways... are you avoiding rye, barley, oats too? Do they make you sick? If they don't, it's less likely to be celiac.

skigirlchar Newbie

i had gone gluten-free and then had to "add it in" for both the blood work & the biopsy

i came up negative on both tests but i have the same vomit issue that you do. (example - last night i had something made by someone else.... i woke up in the middle of the night vomiting.)

some of the items i do have positive allergy test results for

some i don't

i have since gone gluten-free/CF/SF and while it's difficult, i find it's worth it to feel human again

good luck and you know you have support here

nora-n Rookie

Hi, what do you mean by "IgA level slightly positive"?

was it the total IgA, or the ttg IgA, or the antigliadin IgA?

Have you heard about ee, eosinophilic esophagus? This is food allergy related. There are several postings about ee here, and it is somewhat related to celiac in as that some have both.

If you surf on www.thefooddoc.com 's blog, there is an article about ee there too. And about early celiac where the tests are not high yet.

Jeffiner Apprentice

Thank you that have replied for the information and support. I had a Transglutimnase IgA Autoantibodies of 4.5. A weak positive is 4-10. All the other numbers were normal.

mommida Enthusiast

Going back to your scope on the esophagus, what type of damage was happening there? Did you have any biopsies taken from the esophagus? Do you have a copy of that report? Do you have pictures?

Eosinophilic Esophagitis was only given a standardized medical code in October of 2008 (if I remember right). Doctors might not be fully aware of all of the eosinophillic disorders that can occur anywhere thoughout the GI tract. Some cases of GERD might be misdiagnosed. If the doctor does not order the biopsy to be examined for Eoisinophils the pathologist will not give the eosinophil count. ( Adult diagnoses will depend on the range of the count)

Damage in the esophagus from EE would be active eosinophils. Eosinophils are the nastiest white blood cells the body makes. The cells have a spearlike projection to attack foreign bodies (mostly parasitic infection) but the cells don't know how to tell the difference from it's own bodies tissue. The cells cause damage to anything it comes in contact with.

The E's are sometimes visible with the scope, but normal looking tissues need to be biopsied as the E's can be imbedded into the tissue. Furrows can be seen in the esophagus and can cause food to get stuck.

Since there really isn't much to support valid medications for treatment, it is best to avoid any triggers. Allergy testing may help an individual learn what to avoid, but most cases allergy testing reveals nothing. The trigger may be food or airborn and possibly seasonal.

Vomitting on a daily basis is definately a symptom.

Jeffiner Apprentice

Going back to your scope on the esophagus, what type of damage was happening there? Did you have any biopsies taken from the esophagus? Do you have a copy of that report? Do you have pictures?

Eosinophilic Esophagitis was only given a standardized medical code in October of 2008 (if I remember right). Doctors might not be fully aware of all of the eosinophillic disorders that can occur anywhere thoughout the GI tract. Some cases of GERD might be misdiagnosed. If the doctor does not order the biopsy to be examined for Eoisinophils the pathologist will not give the eosinophil count. ( Adult diagnoses will depend on the range of the count)

Damage in the esophagus from EE would be active eosinophils. Eosinophils are the nastiest white blood cells the body makes. The cells have a spearlike projection to attack foreign bodies (mostly parasitic infection) but the cells don't know how to tell the difference from it's own bodies tissue. The cells cause damage to anything it comes in contact with.

The E's are sometimes visible with the scope, but normal looking tissues need to be biopsied as the E's can be imbedded into the tissue. Furrows can be seen in the esophagus and can cause food to get stuck.

Since there really isn't much to support valid medications for treatment, it is best to avoid any triggers. Allergy testing may help an individual learn what to avoid, but most cases allergy testing reveals nothing. The trigger may be food or airborn and possibly seasonal.

Vomitting on a daily basis is definately a symptom.

All the doctor said was that I had esophagitis from vomiting so much. I have the picture but there was no biopsy taken from it.

l_99a5cb47045c49b0abd19b1fe51352a3.webp


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mommida Enthusiast

The esophagus definately has the furrows (the grooves). There is some of cream colored pus stuff in the furrows.

The doudendom (sorry can't spelll today) has the creamy speckled look.

Talk to your doctor about the possibility of Eosinophils. (The name of eosinophils is because of the cells absorbtion of red dye.)

My daughter was vommitting up to 5 times a day. Were you given a steroid puffer to help heal?

nora-n Rookie

Unless you have giardiosis or some kind of liver disease or diabetes 1, shich might give a false positive on the ttg test, the positive ttg test does mean something.

How many biopsies did they take from the duodenum?

Some places they have started to take at least 12-15, because celiac is typically patchy (something they have only been aware of for a few years) and it is easy to miss the celiac patches.

With the standard 4 they would mostly find very advanced celiac.

Also, some people only have the celiac lesions on the wrong end, and they find that with a pill cam.

The pill cam will even show such good images of the villi that they can see if the villi are blunted=celiac.

Some pathologists are just lousy at diagnosing celiac. You might have a positive biopsy, but the pathologist thought one needeed total loss of villi and did not count the IEL's (special staining technique needed for that) and increased IEL's means celiac. But that is new too.

Yes, they should have biopsied the esophagus to check for ee.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,074
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Amy1620
    Newest Member
    Amy1620
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
    • Scott Adams
      BTW, we've done other articles on this topic that I wanted to share here (not to condone smoking!):    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.