Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

If One More Person Says....


adab8ca

Recommended Posts

adab8ca Enthusiast

you should start feeling better by now being gluten free (it's been a week)

I will scream.

a) I have few GI symptoms (except weight loss of 25 lbs in 6 months w/o trying)

b ) I have LOTS of neuro symptoms

c)The GI saw damage on the endoscopy that looked like classic celiac. He took the biopsy, but there was damage visible already.

I am thinking a week is a little short to expect much when I am probably still purging gluten from my system.

I wish I was one of those people that felt better in a week and so, it was totally conclusive but apparently,I am not. I felt no worse on gluten.

It makes me very discouraged and cranky.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

It sounds like you're being realistic. A week is too short to get rid of all your symptoms, especially when they are neuro. Heck, I've been gluten free for 8 months and when I get accidental gluten it takes a week (sometimes longer) before my symptoms go away. So keep up the gluten free diet and ignore those naysayers.

Skylark Collaborator

Time to practice scathing looks. :P

With your high TTG and damage, you're on a timeline of months. Don't let the idjuts get you down!

India Contributor

With your high TTG and damage, you're on a timeline of months. Don't let the idjuts get you down!

Hi Skylark - I think I've noticed elsewhere that you're pretty keen on good scientific evidence :) Can you tell me if you know of any research that supports this? I'm told my I had a very high TTG score (>1000, though I don't know how the UK scale compares to the US) and that my Marsh score was 2-3, though I don't know how this compares to other people. I'm wondering if this could explain my depressing lack of progress after 9 months.

Ahorsesoul Enthusiast

Simple answer for them "Why in the world would you even think that?".

Skylark Collaborator

Hi Skylark - I think I've noticed elsewhere that you're pretty keen on good scientific evidence :) Can you tell me if you know of any research that supports this? I'm told my I had a very high TTG score (>1000, though I don't know how the UK scale compares to the US) and that my Marsh score was 2-3, though I don't know how this compares to other people. I'm wondering if this could explain my depressing lack of progress after 9 months.

Here's a couple references for you. Coming back from Marsh 3, you're looking at maybe two years to really recover, and some people still have a little abnormal histology after five years.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Other things to consider are that some celiacs react to casein (milk protein) as though it were gluten and do not recover until they are casein-free. Others react to oats, so avoid those until you're feeling better. Also that 200 ppm Codex wheat starch available in Europe is not suitable for all celiacs. If you're eating that it may keep you from healing.

India Contributor

Here's a couple references for you. Coming back from Marsh 3, you're looking at maybe two years to really recover, and some people still have a little abnormal histology after five years.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Other things to consider are that some celiacs react to casein (milk protein) as though it were gluten and do not recover until they are casein-free. Others react to oats, so avoid those until you're feeling better. Also that 200 ppm Codex wheat starch available in Europe is not suitable for all celiacs. If you're eating that it may keep you from healing.

Thank you for this - I do appreciate it. I'm feeling pretty tired of worrying and messing around with my diet and wondering if I should just accept that recovery will take time. I'm also trying to ignore a couple of the scarier things in that abstract and focus on being glad I got myself diagnosed :)

I'm pretty strict about what I eat and already avoid oats and casein, though I think I have other intolerances too. I don't eat Codex either - I wouldn't have wanted to eat such messed around junk when I was healthy and you couldn't pay me to eat it now...

ps - Apologies to the original poster for hijacking this :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

you should start feeling better by now being gluten free (it's been a week)

I will scream.

a) I have few GI symptoms (except weight loss of 25 lbs in 6 months w/o trying)

b ) I have LOTS of neuro symptoms

c)The GI saw damage on the endoscopy that looked like classic celiac. He took the biopsy, but there was damage visible already.

I am thinking a week is a little short to expect much when I am probably still purging gluten from my system.

I wish I was one of those people that felt better in a week and so, it was totally conclusive but apparently,I am not. I felt no worse on gluten.

It makes me very discouraged and cranky.

Go ahead and scream at them. You didn't get sick overnight and you won't heal overnight. You may also have some withdrawl for the first month or so.

You will heal but it will take some time. Some of my neuro stuff resolved pretty quickly, like in a couple months but some stuff took a lot longer. Nerves take time to repair.

dilettantesteph Collaborator

My gut issues did feel a lot better right away. Even the day after I stopped eating bread and Cheerios I felt much better. I didn't realize that my neuro issues had been caused by gluten until they went away months later. Hang in there.

My husband seems to think that getting better means never getting glutened again. It's been almost 3 years now. Ain't gonna happen.

cassP Contributor

yes! give it time! my gut issues take about 3 weeks to improve- but i think the gut may heal faster than the nerves, brain, and skin...

i-geek Rookie

It sounds like you're being realistic. A week is too short to get rid of all your symptoms, especially when they are neuro. Heck, I've been gluten free for 8 months and when I get accidental gluten it takes a week (sometimes longer) before my symptoms go away. So keep up the gluten free diet and ignore those naysayers.

Exactly this. I mean, sure, some of my symptoms got better within a week (as in no more daily headaches), but the gut stuff took months to fully heal. It was a full two months before I could digest even lactose-free dairy again. Stick with it and you will eventually get relief. At the very least, you're not doing further damage to yourself so that's something.

sandsurfgirl Collaborator

Oh man at one week I was still bedridden!

I overwhelm ignorance with facts and give them an education they never wanted! "It's an autoimmune disease that causes organ damage." The minute I say that they usually shut up. "My small intestine has been destroyed and attacked by my immune system so it takes time to repair and heal. There is no medication for it so I just have to hope my body heals all the damage that was done by being misdiagnosed for years and years."

All said with a sad guilt inducing look of course.

I hate to tell you, but it was 6 months before I started feeling pretty good most days. 7 months until I was having lots of days with pretty much no symptoms.

I was really really badly sick for about 5 months, although I had improvements for sure. My anxiety cleared up almost immediately and that one had gotten so bad it was almost debilitating.

I went through awful withdrawals. So hungry I could gnaw my own arm off if I didn't get food. For a few weeks I was having bowel movements of every sort like 10 and 12 times per day, I'm NOT kidding! It was awful. I caused such bad dehydration I had dizzy spells and sometimes couldn't leave the house. Had to drink plenty of Gatorade because the natural electrolytes made me really sick and keep on my water. If I didn't hydrate properly first thing in the morning I couldn't function all day long.

It was a roller coaster ride.

If you search on here and read old threads about withdrawal you'll see that whatever you deal with, somebody else has dealt with too.

There was a period about week 3 or 4 where I just couldn't eat anything without getting sick. Everything bothered my gut. Then it went away. I had all these other intolerances, but most cleared up except soy, that evil foul substance that causes me pain like a torture chamber.

So hang in there and give them what for if they start in with that nonsense. Would they say that to a cancer patient??????

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Mmoc replied to Mmoc's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

    2. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    3. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    5. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Mmoc
      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.