Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Something I Find Annoying

tennisman

By tennisman
in Coping with Celiac Disease

Recommended Posts

tennisman Contributor
tennisman
Posted

Recently I have been getting very annoyed at food companies . Why can't all food companies put Gluten Free or Not Gluten Free on their labels ? I mean it's very simple all it takes is 10 letters it's not difficult :angry: . Could you imagine how easy it would be to go shopping and find out if an item of food is Gluten Free or not in 1 second without having to read every single ingredient.

I am going to write a letter to some big food companies , and include videos or websites about Celiac Disease and ask them if it will be possible to start labelling more products with Gluten Free or not Gluten Free :) I mean they can write suitable for vegetarians so why can't they write Gluten Free on the labels ?????

Has anyone else written to food companies asking them to label more products ?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


celiac-mommy Collaborator
celiac-mommy
Posted

I haven't, but I've called companies to thank them for their labeling or reformulating!

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star
GlutenFreeManna
Posted

I think some companies don't want to do it because of liability reasons. No gluten ingredients used does not always mean gluten free. Also in some countries if they claim something is gluten free they have to do testing to back up that claim. The US doesn't currently require testing, but I know other places do.

I get around this by just eating mostly whole unprocessed foods that are naturally gluten free. There's no need to pick up a bunch of bananas and try to figure out if it has gluten in it. ;)

jenngolightly Contributor
jenngolightly
Posted

I also think they don't do it for commercial reasons. People are wary of "gluten free." Don't you have relatives who turn up their noses when they hear you're bringing a "gluten free" dish for a meal? I think that regular people don't understand that many things are naturally gluten-free. It might make them think twice about buying something. They think: gluten free? That probably doesn't taste as good as this non-gluten-free variety.

It's a matter of educating the population. But if we can't even educate Aunt Glenda, can you imagine how hard it's going to be to educate the rest of the world?

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted

At this point in the US, there isn't a true legal definition of "gluten-free". I much prefer when manufacturers clearly list any gluten in the ingredient list and if the product is processed on the same lines as those with gluten.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

That's why I will not move anyplace that doesn't have a Wegmans. They make shopping so easy for us. I have never had a CC reaction from any of their products and if I see the circle G I know the item is safe. I don't know why other companies don't do the same thing unless it is the liability issue or they just source their ingredients from places they are not sure of.

psawyer Proficient
psawyer
Posted

There is a requirement in the USA and Canada (and likely most other places) that a label not be misleading.

To label something gluten-free implies that gluten-free is a factor which distinguishes this particular product from similar products. If the nature of the product is that it is inherently gluten-free, and all products of that type are gluten-free, then it is misleading (and illegal) to label it as gluten-free. You can have gluten-free pasta, gluten-free baked goods, gluten-free gravy, and so forth.

You can not, however, have gluten-free apples, gluten-free milk, gluten-free butter or gluten-free rice. Such products are allowed to say either:

"Xxxx is a gluten-free food." or

"This xxxx, like all xxxx, is gluten-free."

Where "xxxx" is the product type (not brand), for example "quinoa".

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Juliebove Rising Star
Juliebove
Posted

I can see why people wouldn't want to put gluten-free on their labels. Cross contamination is highly likely. And many companies package their food on shared lines or in a facility that uses all sorts of ingredients. In such a case they would not want to use the gluten-free label even if the product is gluten-free in and of itself. Yes, I know some companies do this but I can see why they wouldn't want to.

tennisman Contributor
tennisman
Posted
  • Author

Thanks for all the replies.

Today I bought some Haribo sweets , even though I have had these sweets many times before ( but not for a few weeks ) I checked the ingredients and the Haribo still looked Gluten Free. But there was no " Gluten Free " on the packet. So I checked my Celiac book of what's Gluten Free and found out the Haribo was definitely Gluten Free :D Later I checked the Haribo website and it says Gluten Free.

Why can't they put this on the packet ? It's so annoying if they can put it's Gluten Free on there website why can't they put it on the packet ?

GFinDC Veteran
GFinDC
Posted

Thanks for all the replies.

Today I bought some Haribo sweets , even though I have had these sweets many times before ( but not for a few weeks ) I checked the ingredients and the Haribo still looked Gluten Free. But there was no " Gluten Free " on the packet. So I checked my Celiac book of what's Gluten Free and found out the Haribo was definitely Gluten Free :D Later I checked the Haribo website and it says Gluten Free.

Why can't they put this on the packet ? It's so annoying if they can put it's Gluten Free on there website why can't they put it on the packet ?

Good question. Maybe you could send them a an email and ask their reason. :)

tennisman Contributor
tennisman
Posted
  • Author

Good question. Maybe you could send them a an email and ask their reason. :)

I will do that :) If the company can put Gluten Free on there website than they can put Gluten Free on the packet . It's time for a change :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,699
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    RelievedP
    Newest Member
    RelievedP
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wends
      Blood results

      By Wends · Posted

      Hopefully the biopsy gives a conclusive and correct diagnosis for your daughter. Im in the UK and have been in the situation a few years ago of trying to rule celiac in or out after inconclusive results. Many symptoms pointing to it including the classic symptoms and weight loss and folate and iron deficiency. You have to play a waiting game. I also had the label of IBS and likely food allergy. Genetic test showed low risk for celiac but not no risk. It sounds like the Gastroenterologist is on it and hopefully will diagnose what it is correctly. Food hypersensitivity (allergy) can also cause similar symptoms and inflammation as well as mimicking IBS. Milk / dairy and wheat (cereal grains) being the biggest culprits. The “oesophagitis” and “gastritis” you mentioned can be caused by another gastrointestinal disorder called “eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders”. These are named depending on which part of the gastrointestinal tract is affected. For example eosinophilic oesophagitis, eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, and more rare eosinophilic colitis. They are antigen (allergen) driven. When the blood test measuring anti-ttg antibodies is positive in absence of a positive ema test - which is more specific to celiac, this can also suggest food hypersensitivity (allergy). Usually delayed type allergy similar to celiac but not autoimmune if that makes sense. In this case the ttg antibodies are transient. Which happens. I’ve first hand experience. For info, evidence of villous atrophy too can be caused by food hypersensitivity. Not just by celiac disease. In Egid disorders the six food elimination diet, under a dietitian and gastroenterologist care, is the dietary protocol to figure out the culprit or culprits. Sometimes only two food elimination diet is used at first. The number one culprit is milk protein / dairy. Followed by wheat, eggs, soy, fish and seafood, and nuts. Most are only reactive to one food group or two. Most are only reactive to milk. Hope this is a helpful reply.
    • Bennyboy1998
      Potential celiac need advice

      By Bennyboy1998 · Posted

      Yes gene HLADQ2 was positive 
    • Wends
      Inconclusive results

      By Wends · Posted

      Wow, the system is crazy isn’t it? Maybe switch Doctors if you can. It’s surprising from what you’ve written it seems obvious it’s celiac disease. The “potential” diagnosis means celiac is developing and it basically just hasn’t done enough gut damage to be captured on the biopsy yet, and meet that “criteria” to satisfy the current system! Given the overwhelming evidence already - family history, positive ttg and ema. And your own experience and intuition which counts far more. And the labs being reproduced after gluten elimination and reintroduction- elimination and reintroduction diet is the gold standard too. Shame on the Doc and the system. What was the Marsh score? I’m guessing not 0 if it’s potential celiac. Meaning the autoimmune process has been triggered and started. Your daughter is obviously very healthy and her immune system is putting up a good fight. It can take years for the gut damage to build to a point where there’s overt symptoms and then a conclusive diagnosis, hence why many celiacs receive diagnosis later in life. You can prevent it. See the positive and the gift in that. Hopefully the gluten challenge confirms it, but if it doesn’t maybe get a second opinion?
    • cristiana
      How Come Gluten Didnt Bother Me In Italy

      By cristiana · Posted

      @Gigi2025  Thank you for your interesting post.  Some of what you say chimes with something my gastroenterologist tells me - that he has clients who travel to France and find the same as you  - they will eat normal wheat baguette there without issue, for example.  His theory was he thought it might be to do with the locally sourced wheat being different to our own in the UK? But I have to say my own experience has been quite different. I have been to France twice since my diagnosis, and have been quite ill due to what was then (pre-2019)  poor labelling and cross-contamination issues.  My TTG test following my last visit was elevated - 'proof of the pudding', as we say in the UK!  It was not just a case of eating something like, say, shellfish, that disagreed with me - gluten was clearly an issue. I've also been to Italy to visit family a couple of times since my diagnosis.  I did not want to take any chances so kept to my gluten free diet, but whilst there what I did notice is that coeliacs are very well catered for in Italy, and many brands with the same ingredients in the UK are clearly marked on the front of their packaging that they are 'senza glutine'.  In the UK, you would have to find that information in the small print - or it puts people off buying it, so I am told!  So it seems to me the Italians are very coeliac aware - in fact, all children are, I believe, screened for coeliac disease at the age of 6.  That must mean, I guess, that many Italian coeliacs are actively avoiding gluten because, presumably, if they don't, they will fall ill?        
    • deanna1ynne
      Inconclusive results

      By deanna1ynne · Posted

      Thank you both very much. I’m pretty familiar with the various tests, and my older two girls with official dxs have even participated in research on other tests as well. I just felt overwhelmed and shocked that these recent results (which I found pretty dang conclusive after having scott clean labs just six months ago) would still be considered inconclusive. Doc said we could biopsy in another six weeks because my daughter was actually way more upset than I anticipated about the idea of eating it for years before doing another biopsy. It doesn’t hurt her, but she’s afraid of how it may be hurting her in ways she can’t feel. She’s currently eating mini wheats for breakfast, a sandwich with lunch, and a side of pasta along with every dinner, so I’m hoping we’re meeting that 10g benchmark mentioned in that second article!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.