Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

If You Have Negative Blood Tests, But Respond To Being gluten-free...

MitziG

Recommended Posts

MitziG Enthusiast
MitziG
Posted

My kids and I were all dx with Celiac after biopsies in April. None of us presented with "classic" symptoms at the time, though I had a childhood that fit the bill plainly. I was reading the biopsy reports today and something caught my attention:

MY report (the GI dx me before the biopsy was rcv'd, based solely on the appearance of my guts. He said it was obvious I had this for a long time, and that damage was severe. But note what the report says>>>

"Prominent villous defect, elongated crypts, surface epithelium contains MODERATE numbers of lymphocytes,, lamina propria contains numerous heteramorphous chronic inflammatory cells, mostly plasma cells and eosinophils"

My blood work was BARELY positive...TTG of 6, with >4 being positive

Now...my DAUGHTER'S bloodwork was more certain- ttg of 26, same values

HER endoscopy looked normal, but the biopsy revealed:

"slight increase in inflammatory cells, slightly elongated crypts, severe villous defect with severe increase in number of intrepithelial lymphocytes"

So...I know the theory has been passed around the board here that silent celiacs may have been fighting gluten so long that the immune system can no longer muster a response. Wondering if part of that "suppressed response" would be indicated by less lymphocyte activity? and thus a lower Ttg? I am not well-versed in the science aspect of all this, or the terminology...but it just seemed interesting to me that my serious visual damage showed only moderate lymphocytes, and a weak positive blood test, while my daughter's less severe damage indicated an immune system hard at work and a much higher TTg?

Just a theory that could maybe explain the negative serology of so many people on here who very clearly have a problem with gluten. Maybe their bodies are just too sick to even MAKE antibodies?

What do you think?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Kathy59 Rookie
Kathy59
Posted

Most of it is too in depth for me to explain, all I know is my blood work was negative for Celiac; I had an endecsopy (sp) prior to blood work and nothing was found (but not sure even looking for) at time was sent due to B12 deficiency, but they were not looking for Celiac....treated for active mono, EBV, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, some improvement, but still had chronic Poops...LOL! Gene test for Celiac and there it was full blown. I would just say if gluten-free lifestyle works then do it. I once had a dr tell me...test results are only has good as the test ordered!

beebs Enthusiast
beebs
Posted

That is a very interesting theory - I am no help because I haven't had the biopsy - but I have had completely negative bloods, but my reactions are so severe that they are considered life threatening. I have always wondered how that is possible - how can I test negative when if I eat gluten I get intussusception and am rushed to emergency. It just doesn't make any sense to me.

SarahJimMarcy Apprentice
SarahJimMarcy
Posted

My blood test was negative. I went gluten free with my daughter and within two days felt better. Months later, the doctor, in all his wisdom, thought I should go back on gluten for two months so they could do an endoscopy. I wouldn't do it. They did the genetic test which came back positive. The genetic test is just a blood draw and it was covered by insurance. Could consider going that route.

pricklypear1971 Community Regular
pricklypear1971
Posted

I had stomach issues when I was a kid. Ulcers at 9, stomach aches at 18 (and more ulcers). Weird stomach cramping/D in my mid 20's. Abdominal pain in late 20's (suspected endometriosis).

After my son was born - nada, except I'd get stomach "bugs" easily and mysteriously eat something "bad" once in a while. But, my thyroid tanked. Got thyroid meds.

Thyroid meds worked for the most part for about 5 years. Then I broke out in that dang rash.

I think the escalating symptoms (and lack of stomach issues - or D turning to chronic C) was my body giving up on one method of attack (GI) and turning to something else (skin, neuro).

So, yes, I think Celiac evolves and changes over time.

MitziG Enthusiast
MitziG
Posted
  • Author

My blood test was negative. I went gluten free with my daughter and within two days felt better. Months later, the doctor, in all his wisdom, thought I should go back on gluten for two months so they could do an endoscopy. I wouldn't do it. They did the genetic test which came back positive. The genetic test is just a blood draw and it was covered by insurance. Could consider going that route.

Good for you! I wouldn't do it either! You shouldn't have to have a test verify that something makes you sick! I wish more doctors would just dx based on symptoms when blood tests and/or biopsies don't always show the true picture. Though in my case, I am grateful for the tests, because I had no idea gluten was a problem for any of us. I had some stomach issues from time to time, but like the above poster, always chalked it up to "eating something that didnt agree with me." My reaction was definitely never something that I would have connected to gluten. Now, after having been off gluten almost 10 months, I have a very obvious reaction to it, very quickly, so I guess that means my immune system is recovering anyway!

UKGail Rookie
UKGail
Posted

I know of one celiac specialist who also thinks that long-standing celiac disease may result in sero-negativity.

You might also find the following link about sero-negative celiac disease useful. It is not completely disheartening. There are some doctors who are thinking about this issue.

Open Original Shared Link

Prickly - my journey is pretty similar to yours except I don't get DH, but had other things too. I agree with your feelings about the development of Celiac, that it gets worse, and presents in new ways if ignored for too long.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


pricklypear1971 Community Regular
pricklypear1971
Posted

I know of one celiac specialist who also thinks that long-standing celiac disease may result in sero-negativity.

You might also find the following link about sero-negative celiac disease useful. It is not completely disheartening. There are some doctors who are thinking about this issue.

Open Original Shared Link

Prickly - my journey is pretty similar to yours except I don't get DH, but had other things too. I agree with your feelings about the development of Celiac, that it gets worse, and presents in new ways if ignored for too long.

Great link.

I've said it before and I'll scream it from the rooftops...the problems are the tests.

I have an easier time accepting this since I have thyroid disease, which is notorious for bad tests.

BrittLoves2Run Apprentice
BrittLoves2Run
Posted

Most of it is too in depth for me to explain, all I know is my blood work was negative for Celiac; I had an endecsopy (sp) prior to blood work and nothing was found (but not sure even looking for) at time was sent due to B12 deficiency, but they were not looking for Celiac....treated for active mono, EBV, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, some improvement, but still had chronic Poops...LOL! Gene test for Celiac and there it was full blown. I would just say if gluten-free lifestyle works then do it. I once had a dr tell me...test results are only has good as the test ordered!

I'm jumping in late.. but what does the Gene test...for lack of better words "show" or "prove" that are different from the Celiac panel? I'm a newbie and I really don't know!

Metoo Enthusiast
Metoo
Posted

I'm jumping in late.. but what does the Gene test...for lack of better words "show" or "prove" that are different from the Celiac panel? I'm a newbie and I really don't know!

A gene test would show that you carried genetic markers that show that are at an increased risk for having celiac. Unfortunately it does not prove whether you do or don't have celiac.

stanleymonkey Explorer
stanleymonkey
Posted

my daughter was positive genes, negative blood, and WAS doing great diet wise, so was given a tentative diagnosis of celiac and or nerve damage to her bowel.

I have negative blood, vintage been wait g gluten lite as I don't eat gluten around my daughter bandage noticed I feel enter so has my husband

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,685
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    tdouglas2901
    Newest Member
    tdouglas2901
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.