Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Making A Roux?


gabrielle

Recommended Posts

gabrielle Contributor

I have so many chowder recipes and sauce recipes that call for a flour roux. Would cornstarch be acceptable to use in this situation? If not, what could i use to thicken my soups??

:unsure: Will it still taste yummy?

Thanks! Gabby


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

I don't think cornstarch would be the best way to go - it will give a little bit different consistency and color. Rice flour may work a bit better, though. particularly sweet rice flour.

hez Enthusiast

I do not like using cornstarch for a roux. I have had a bit of luck using All Purpose gluten-free Flour from Bob's Red Mil. It will not give you exactly the same results but fairly close.

Jnkmnky Collaborator

I use cornstarch all the time. It's fine.

mommida Enthusiast

Have you considered potato flakes as a thickener or are you starting from a roux base? Try the gluten free flour mixes.

Laura

skbird Contributor

I don't make soups with a roux to start but have been thickening my creamy soups with sweet rice flour. What I do is cook the veggies, etc, in the water/broth, and when they are well cooked and I am about to add the cream I take some sweet rice flour and put it in a sifter and shake it into the soup as I stir. This seems to thicken it nicely.

I do make gravy - I usually use white rice flour (not necessarily sweet rice flour) but funny thing, last Thanksgiving I forgot to bring it to my parents house so my husband ran home to get it for me and accidentally brought the tapioca starch flour (which I didn't notice, even though I was thinking the consistency was a little different). Since I always feel under pressure to "perform" making the gravy, I got to work. It always takes me about 30 mins because I make as much as I can (can't have enough!) and I was really working hard to make it as normal as usual - first time with non-gluten flour - and it came out fine. It was only later in the evening I realized I'd used tapioca instead of rice. Based on that experience I would think cornstarch would work pretty well, it's somewhat similar (both have that "walking on fresh snow" crunch).

Stephanie

nettiebeads Apprentice
I have so many chowder recipes and sauce recipes that call for a flour roux.  Would cornstarch be acceptable to use in this situation? If not, what could i use to thicken my soups?? 

:unsure: Will it still taste yummy?

Thanks! Gabby

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I've found that it takes a combination of things to replace the flour. I would start making it the traditional way using cornstarch to incorporate the butter. Then if it doesn't thicken up as you would like it, use potato flakes. (instant potatoes are great for "saving" gravies, sauces and soups)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



grantschoep Contributor

Ok... I have to ask this. I cook alot, grew up cooking and figured I knew alot about things...

What the heck is a roux?

:>

Kim Explorer

A roux is a mixture of melted butter (or other fat) and flour. You make it into a "paste" and then it thickens soups, sauces, etc.

If you are going to make a paste, it's best to use rice/sweet rice or tapioca flour, or a gluten-free flour mix. Otherwise, you can use a slurry (a mixture of water and cornstarch which is thicker than a paste -- it's runny/liquid) as a thickener. Depending on your recipe, you may prefer one over the other. For a chowder recipe, I would think either would work.

Kim.

grantschoep Contributor

Cool, thanks. I know more now. Actually, I have to ask my Mom now to see if she knows what a roux is.

jams Explorer

I got my Celiac update from google just now. This was in there. Just thought I'd share...

Wheat-free roux update

I got lots of mail regarding alternate sauce-thickening methods for the gluten-intolerant. Bev Lieven of Milwaukee passed along a recommendation from the Milwaukee Celiac-Sprue Crew, a support group for people who can't digest gluten: "Toast sweet rice flour in a dry pan until it is golden. This can be whisked into hot liquids as you would flour to thicken gravy. Rice flour continues to get thicker as the liquid evaporates, just like wheat flour."

I decided to make two bechamel sauces, side by side, one with wheat flour and one with rice flour. In each of two saucepans I combined 2 tablespoons of flour (wheat or rice) with 2 tablespoons butter over low heat until the mixture was bubbling and just starting to brown. I then whisked in 1 1/4 cups whole milk and simmered over low heat, whisking almost constantly, until the sauces thickened. The rice-flour-based sauce was a little sweeter and had a slightly grainier texture but was an entirely acceptable bechamel.

gabrielle Contributor

Thanks everyone!!

kvogt Rookie

If you are cooking Cajun (whooo... don't you know?) you have a couple of good choices for rouxs. I've used soy flour, which gives a peanutish flavor to gravy or sauce. I've used Garfava flour, which toasts up nicely, but tends to be a little gritty if you don't boil it for more that 10-15 minutes. The gluten-free flour mixes contain potato starch and tapioca, which makes a sticky roux. The best I've found is white rice flours. A Cajun roux is dark brown, so it takes some time to make, but it makes a gravy or ettouffee so good. Cook ever so slowly in Wesson or similar oil over low heat, whisking every 1-2 minutes. Cast iron pan is best. When the roux is dark brown and the house smells like burned popcorn, the roux is ready for your gumbo or whatever.

beelzebubble Contributor

my husband swears by corn flour for his roux. he says it has both the right consistency and the right flavor, which is harder to come by. but, that is for cajun food. for other foods where the roux is a stronger component of the flavor, i agree that rice might be better.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,274
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Heidi W
    Newest Member
    Heidi W
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • numike
      Thank you for the reply In the early 2000's I did not have the endoscopy nor the biopsy I do not have those initial records I have only consulted a GI drs in the USA 
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @numike! We sometimes get reports like yours from community members who believe their celiac disease has "gone away." We think there can sometimes be cases of remission but not long term healing and that continued consumption of gluten will eventually result in a relapse. This is the state of our knowledge at this point but there is still a lot we don't know and celiac disease continues to surprise us with new findings on a frequent basis. So, we would not advise you to abandon a strict gluten-free diet. Perhaps you can draw consolation from the fact that at the present time you seem to be able to consume gluten without consequences when in situations where you do not have the option to eat gluten-free. But I would advise you to not generalize your recent experience such that you throw caution to the wind. But I want to go back to what you said about being diagnosed by blood test in the early 2000's. Did you not also have that confirmed with an endoscopy and biopsy of the small bowel lining? Normally, a celiac disease diagnosis is not concluded based on a blood test alone because there can be false positives. What kind of doctor did this testing? Was it done in the U.S. or overseas? In the last few years, it has become common in the U.K. to grant a celiac diagnosis from blood testing alone if the antibody test scores are 10x normal or greater. But that practice has not caught on in the U.S. yet and was not in place internationally in the early 2000's. Do you have a record of the tests that were done, the scores and also the reference ranges for negative vs. positive for the tests?
    • numike
      Check out this celiac story  I was diagnosed early 2000s with the blood test  since then I have for the most part maintained a gluten-free diet  Recently (August 2025) I drove from Southern Illinois to Lake Erie Ohio On the drive back I was extremely hungry and I had a coupon at a hamburger chain and I stopped and forgot to request gluten-free bun etc and quickly consumed two hamburgers. I promptly ate both of them and had absolutely no problem since then I've been eating plenty of gluten  Is my celiac gone?  Insert: No, celiac disease cannot just end because there is no cure for it; however, a strict, lifelong gluten-free diet allows the small intestine to heal and symptoms to go away. To manage the condition effectively, you must strictly avoid all sources of gluten, including wheat, barley, and rye, which are common in the American diet. Sticking to the diet can lead to significant symptom improvement and intestinal healing, but it requires ongoing commitment and monitoring with a healthcare professional  Regarding medical test I had My stools analyzed Giardia Ag Cryptosporidium Ag and they came back negative  I had the lactulose test and it came back high so I'm on two weeks of heavy antibiotics That still has not stopped me from eating gluten. Here's what I think is going on and I hope to have your opinion regarding it  Since I've been gluten-free for so long my intestinal tract has repaired itself consequently anything I eat with gluten now just bounces right off with no damage to my gut  however  when I asked AI what was going on the reply was celiac has not gone away and  if I continue to eat gluten I'm going to have problems   I look forward to your sage advice as to what the heck is going on with me Thank you for reading Mike 09112025
    • Scott Adams
      I agree, and generally it means that it isn't working in a high enough percentage of participants to continue pursuing it.
    • RMJ
      It is more likely code for “we think there really was a good response to the treatment, but it was small or in a small percent of subjects so it would take a large clinical trial to try to prove it.”
×
×
  • Create New...