Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing After Being Gluten Free


Peppa-minto

Recommended Posts

GFinDC Veteran

Thanks for looking that info up Lisa. It seems there is no agreement on the required time for a gluten challenge among the main celiac centers in the USA. Kind of a basic thing that it seems like they could agree on. Some say 3 months, others say a month and half. And the recent research suggests it may be possible to detect celiac reactions with a much shorter timeframe, possibly a couple weeks. But there is no consensus I can see among the leading celiac centers right now on a duration requirement.

Tom, I think this is an important point you raised and it would be good if we could work together somehow to change that situation. Having the forum members change their recommendation is fine, but the medical community are the ones doing the tests and they are the ones who need to change.

Maybe we could start a letter writing campaign to the various celiac groups to encourage them to work the issue with the medical community? I am willing to write a letter (email) to a few of them. But numbers speak louder so a few more people writing about it might help.

It seems silly to have such large discrepancies in testing recommendations.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
GottaSki Mentor

Does the amount of gluten make any difference for te length of time?

Sorry your thread got hijacked - but it does point out some of the difficulties in obtaining a celiac diagnosis.

Common sense tells me that eating more gluten should cause more of a reaction, but I have no references to quote on that.

Have you started the challenge - any adverse reactions to gluten? Guess part of the equation will be how much gluten you can eat. Not sure what led you to look into celiac and trial eating gluten-free or whether you had any improvement during the weeks you were gluten-free.

If you are still planning to have blood tests after a few weeks, I'd suggest you eat similarly to the one reference from Mayo of 4 slices whole wheat bread for 4 weeks. If you are going to do a longer challenge a slice of bread per day seems to be enough.

Maybe we could start a letter writing campaign to the various celiac groups to encourage them to work the issue with the medical community? I am willing to write a letter (email) to a few of them. But numbers speak louder so a few more people writing about it might help.

It seems silly to have such large discrepancies in testing recommendations.

Good idea...curious what you are thinking of writing...it would be nice if there was consensus amongst Celiac Centers with regard to testing, but even more important that primary doctors throughout our medical system become educated on all the symptoms of Celiac Disease along with correct testing procedures. It is amazing that not even all gastroenterologists are properly educated with regard to Celiac. Since what I'd like fixed is a bit too large to tackle - a good start would be getting celiac centers to agree on testing procedures - at least that can potentially trickle down to other docs.

tom Contributor

Does the amount of gluten make any difference for the length of time?

The studies I've seen (including those I've referenced in this thread) are recommending moderate doses.

2-3g/day is the equivalent of around 1 slice of bread.

One study compared 2 levels of gluten/day & the other had 3.

tom Contributor

...

Common sense tells me that eating more gluten should cause more of a reaction, but I have no references to quote on that.

...

Of course the question isn't whether more gluten makes someone sicker, it's how much makes for a valid test.

And sorry but I can't help but throw in that Common Sense tells ppl that heavier things fall faster.

justlisa Apprentice

Seems to me that the advice of 3 months (by many members here and other forums I visit) for an increased chance of "accurate" test results is based on the experience of members AND the experience of others (many folks have stories of "false" negative testing).

As I've said before, I believe that the current testing is seriously flawed...and that, at some point, "they" are going to figure that out...

Personally, I could never consider a gluten challenge...I want to live... But, if someone I know is considering it, I'll recommend at least 3 months...

Just my opinion...

GFinDC Veteran

Hi Peppaminto,

Sorry we have steered your thread so far from a simple answer. Just maybe the answer will change soon.

Hi Lisa, Tom,

Here's a draft letter. Just a draft, can probably use some fixing up. Suggestions welcome.

August 16, 2012

Celiac Support Group

Dear : ??

I am writing to request that (celiac support group) consider advocating for a standard gluten challenge recommendation among the medical community in the USA.

A review of web sites for major celiac centers in the USA shows that gluten challenge recommendations range from 4 to 12 weeks duration, and the amounts of gluten required vary also.

Recent estimates show there are around 2 million ? undiagnosed celiacs in the USA. Assuming that all 1 million celiacs were put in a gluten challenge for testing, the duration total weeks would vary from 4 million weeks using one recommendation up to 12 million weeks using the longest recommendation. Converting to hours shows 672,000,000 hours required for all 1 million to do the shortest recommended gluten challenge or 1,848,000,000 hours for the same group to do the longest recommended gluten challenge. That difference amounts to 1,176,000,000 hours of additional suffering on the part of these patients.

Obviously 1 million people will not begin a gluten challenge anytime soon. But the goal is to get as many people tested as possible. So the recommendations do have an effect on quality of life for people every day.

It seems possible that gluten challenge duration could be shortened to 4 or maybe 6 weeks as currently recommended by some celiac centers. In addition new testing methods are being researched which may reduce challenge times to a couple of weeks in the future.

I request your group pursue this gluten challenge duration issue with the medical community and promote a recommended duration that is the shortest feasible. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to hearing from you!

Sincerely,

Enclosure

P.P.S. This is all Tom and Lisa's fault.

OK, I am not sure what the current undiagnosed club number is. ! million, or 2 million, or 3 million?

tom Contributor

Seems to me that the advice of 3 months...

This does specifically highlight my point. People HAVEN'T been just giving advice, they've been asserting that w/out 3-4 months there's "no hope of dx" & "will NOT" get a positive or it takes 3-4 months "to have any chance" of a positive. (Quotes from other threads"

This thread had

No, 2-3 weeks is not long enough after having been gluten-free for a month. ...

...

You need to have been actively consuming gluten for 3 months @ equivalent of 3-4 slices of bread per day.

These assertions are not true. (It'd be true to say "there's a chance 2-3wks won't be enough")

Do ppl think it's ok that the statements aren't literally true, chalking it up to & forgiving it as an effective use of hyperbole?

How do those same ppl view statements like "just a crumb can trigger reactions" or "your colander can have hidden gluten no matter how well you washed it"?

The posts I've replied to AREN'T just advice I disagree with. They are claims of an absolute which is easily shown to be false.

There IS (an abundance of) hope for dx w/ less than 3 months GC.

It's NOT impossible to get the correct results after the gluten challenge the Dr scheduled, whether he/she said 4, 6, 8 or even 2 weeks.

Seems to me that the advice of 3 months (by many members here and other forums I visit) for an increased chance of "accurate" test results is based on the experience of members AND the experience of others (many folks have stories of "false" negative testing).

As I've said before, I believe that the current testing is seriously flawed...and that, at some point, "they" are going to figure that out...

Personally, I could never consider a gluten challenge...I want to live... But, if someone I know is considering it, I'll recommend at least 3 months...

Just my opinion...

Recommend away! Multiple times I've suggested rephrasing the basic premise into something that's not false.

If it comes out as potentially implying that less than 3 months is useless, I'll hope I see it so I can add my opinion that all the studies concluding otherwise are correct.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tom Contributor

Hi Peppaminto,

Sorry we have steered your thread so far from a simple answer. Just maybe the answer will change soon.

...

Wasn't peppa's question "is 2 or 3 weeks enough?".

The simple answer is "it certainly could be", not a wholly unsubstantiated "no".

With a few exceptions, I thought most of the posts ARE discussing this.

Isn't this the right process when the answers aren't simple?

I even thought a thread titled "Testing After gluten-free" was a fine place to discuss post-gluten-free gluten challenge & testing specifics.

GottaSki Mentor

GFinDC :)

Love the calculation - don't even want to think how many days, hours and minutes have been lost due to mis-diagnosis of Celiac -- it took 22 million minutes just for me to get diagnosed -- okay I have had some pretty great minutes in there despite severe symptoms :P

Peppa-minto Apprentice

I have mostly easy to live with symptoms... Dizziness, fatigue, constipation, bloating, gas, loose stools... My sister has celiac which is why I suspect this is where my symptoms come from. I am on a fairly high gluten diet, much more than just four slices of bread. Definately felt better gluten free, but I can manage a few weeks eating this way... I just don't k ow of my eating a lot of gluten makes a difference.

Peppa-minto Apprentice

By the way, I dont mind the discussion going on as in the midst of it I am still receiving answers so that's fine by me

squirmingitch Veteran

GFin DC, I think your letter needs to be very specific as to what kind of gluten challenge you are asking about. Blood? Or GI? There is a big difference. Tom began by quoting a GI study result. The op is going for BLOOD testing. The study Tom referenced shows that villi can be influenced AND dx'd in the short time frame of 14 days but we here know that with all but a few exceptions; testing in the real, every day world, for celiac BEGINS with the celiac panel NOT an endoscopy.

So, we need to be specific as to the type of gluten challenge we are asking for them to agree upon.

squirmingitch Veteran

And since we are on this subject.......

I posted this thread not long ago. A PubMed abstract of a study done by UofC.

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/95523-do-gis-adhere-to-dx-guidelines-for-celiac/page__p__815627__fromsearch__1#entry815627

Of course, this only deals with the GI's.

Lisa Mentor

... we here know that with all but a few exceptions; testing in the real, every day world, for celiac BEGINS with the celiac panel NOT an endoscopy.

So, we need to be specific as to the type of gluten challenge we are asking for them to agree upon.

My diagnosis, in my real, everyday world, began with an endoscopy exam. No need to be specific, when nothing is specific. ;)

tom Contributor

GFin DC, I think your letter needs to be very specific as to what kind of gluten challenge you are asking about. Blood? Or GI? There is a big difference. Tom began by quoting a GI study result. The op is going for BLOOD testing. The study Tom referenced shows that villi can be influenced AND dx'd in the short time frame of 14 days....

I already addressed this once earlier in the thread.

EVERY study I linked to did a blood test at EVERY endpoint.

How did this fact not get through the 1st time? Sure that sounds rude but look at what I'm being accused of here.

I'm being accused of trying to use completely irrelevant data to prove a point & it's unequivocally insulting.

You wouldn't even have to actually read the studies to know this, as they all have either 'serological' or 'antibody response' in their titles! :rolleyes:

(FYI to newer readers, serological = blood testing)

On page 1 of this thread, in the 3rd reply to the OP's question I quoted from Open Original Shared Link

Conclusions 14 day GC at ≥3 g of gluten/day induces histological and serological changes in the majority of adults with coeliac disease. These data permit accurate design of clinical trials and indicate that many individuals will meet coeliac diagnostic criteria after a 2-week GC. Open Original Shared Link

Does anyone else think the linked studies didn't do blood tests & aren't applicable? I'll go through it as many times as necessary when I'm being accused of outright dishonest arguments.

GottaSki Mentor

And sorry but I can't help but throw in that Common Sense tells ppl that heavier things fall faster.

Ok...perhaps I should have said IMHO...but come on :blink:

I can help myself but still choose to point out that the wording of your posts indicate no regret in pointing out problems in the wording of my posts.

squirmingitch Veteran

My diagnosis, in my real, everyday world, began with an endoscopy exam. No need to be specific, when nothing is specific. ;)

Lisa, please re-read what i wrote & you quoted ----- I said "all but a FEW exceptions" --- that would be YOU.

And YES, we DO need to be specific. We are trying to get a consensus from the major celiac centers on what would be the time duration as well as the amount of gluten to be consumed for a gluten challenge in re: the BLOOD panel!

Somehow you always seem to miss the point. And when you reply you hardly ever make sense. Write in whole sentences explaining what the heck you are trying to say please.

tom Contributor

Ok...perhaps I should have said IMHO...but come on :blink:

I can help myself but still choose to point out that the wording of your posts indicate no regret in pointing out problems in the wording of my posts.

Is there a word missing in that last sentence?

I really don't know what you're referring to.

My issues w/ wording stem from my acknowledgement that phrases like "will not" & "might not" aren't equivalent & that sentences can change from True to False or vice-versa when the phrases are subbed for each other.

Every recent study I've found proves that celiacs CAN be dx'd by BLOOD earlier than 3 months into a GC.

GottaSki Mentor

Tom-

I was speaking directly to your comment which I referenced in my last post -

"And sorry but I can't help but throw in that Common Sense tells ppl that heavier things fall faster."

I should have kept the thought in my last post to myself - as it is not relevant to this thread.

-Lisa

squirmingitch Veteran

I already addressed this once earlier in the thread.

EVERY study I linked to did a blood test at EVERY endpoint.

How did this fact not get through the 1st time? Sure that sounds rude but look at what I'm being accused of here.

I'm being accused of trying to use completely irrelevant data to prove a point & it's unequivocally insulting.

You wouldn't even have to actually read the studies to know this, as they all have either 'serological' or 'antibody response' in their titles! :rolleyes:

(FYI to newer readers, serological = blood testing)

On page 1 of this thread, in the 3rd reply to the OP's question I quoted from Open Original Shared Link

Does anyone else think the linked studies didn't do blood tests & aren't applicable? I'll go through it as many times as necessary when I'm being accused of outright dishonest arguments.

But Tom, the study said & I pointed that out but you either missed it or chose to ignore it where it says those serological tests DID NOT REACH STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE. That's a pretty strong statement. AND it further said that they observed the TIMING OF INTESTINAL CHANGES DID NOT SIGNIFICANTLY CORRELATE WITH THOSE OF SEROLOGY, SYMPTOMS, OR LAMA.

What do you not understand about that? Or do you refuse to? The serology was NEGATIVE Tom. The serology changed but NOT enough. This is the entire point in this thread.

And I'm sorry if that sounds rude but look what I'm being accused of here. I'm being accused of trying to use completely irrelevant data to prove a point & I AM insulted!

Lisa Mentor

Somehow you always seem to miss the point. And when you reply you hardly ever make sense. Write in whole sentences explaining what the heck you are trying to say please.

I'm sorry that you find it a difficulty understanding my posts. But..to address my point....

Celiac Disease is found, often as secondary diagnosis with over 300 symptoms. No one is the same. There are no consistencies. The methods of diagnoses can vary immensely. I am not the exception.

Hopefully, the testing process can be refined in the years to come.

justlisa Apprentice

My diagnosis, in my real, everyday world, began with an endoscopy exam. No need to be specific, when nothing is specific. ;)

You say diagnosis instead of testing. So, you didn't have blood work before endo?

Interesting... I've not seen that...

tom Contributor

But Tom, the study said & I pointed that out but you either missed it or chose to ignore it where it says those serological tests DID NOT REACH STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE. ...

...

Again?. .. .this was answered the 1st time you said it. This time you left out the most crucial phrase "by day 14".

From page1 of this thread.

I'm not finding that exact line right now, but it's a good thing they continued through to 28 days.

"Antibody titres increased slightly from baseline to day 14 of GC but markedly by day 28."

To use your phraseology (reluctantly) did you "choose to ignore" the fact that none of these studies stops at 14 days?

Or are we "choosing to ignore" that 28 days is far less than 3 months?

Are you still claiming celiacs don't get dx'd in under 3 months despite the very study you keep cherrypicking (re day 14) clearly stating that antibodies increase "markedly by day 28"?

Sheesh

Lisa Mentor

You say diagnosis instead of testing. So, you didn't have blood work before endo?

Interesting... I've not seen that...

You say diagnosis instead of testing. ????

I did NOT have blood work before my endo. As I stated before, my endo and biopsy offered me a diagnosis. I'm certain I'm not the only one.

justlisa Apprentice

You say diagnosis instead of testing. ????

I did NOT have blood work before my endo. As I stated before, my endo and biopsy offered me a diagnosis. I'm certain I'm not the only one.

It was a sincere question... I really haven't come across that before...

I was just looking for clarification because "testing" was being discussed, but you said "diagnosis". From what I've been reading, very few get a "diagnosis" with positive blood work, anyway...

As for the rest of the discussion: There are SO MANY sick people who are struggling and unable to get an official diagnosis. It would be very hard, for me, to advocate a position (shorter GC) when I see so many who can't get a diagnosis when they've been consuming gluten all their lives. I would need to see some major advances in testing. Just my thoughts.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,188
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Leeila
    Newest Member
    Leeila
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Ginger38
      So I recently had allergy testing for IGE antibodies in response to foods. My test results came back positive to corn, white potatoes, egg whites. Tomatoes, almonds and peanuts to name a few.  I have had obvious reactions to a few of these - particularly tomatoes and corn- both GI issues. I don’t really understand all this allergy versus celiac stuff. If the food allergies are mild do I have to avoid these foods entirely? I don’t know what I will eat if I can’t  have corn based gluten free products 
    • Kris2093u4
      Geography makes a difference.  I'm in the West and Trader Joe's gluten-free bread tastes great and is a better price than most gluten-free breads sold elsewhere in my area.  
    • JForman
      We have four children (7-14 yo), and our 7 year old was diagnosed with NCGS (though all Celiac labs were positive, her scope at 4 years old was negative so docs in the US won't call it celiac). We have started her on a Gluten Free diet after 3 years of major digestive issues and ruling out just about everything under the sun. Our home and kitchen and myself are all gluten-free. But I have not asked my husband/her dad or her other siblings to go completely gluten-free with us. They are at home, but not out of the home. This has led to situations when we are eating out where she has to consistently see others eating things she can't have and she has begun to say "Well, I can't have <fill in the blank>...stupid gluten."  How have you supported your gluten-free kiddos in the mental health space of this journey, especially young ones like her. I know it's hard for me as an adult sometimes to miss out, so I can't imagine being 7 and dealing with it! Any tips or ideas to help with this? 
    • Jane878
      By the time I was 5 I had my first auto0immune disorder, Migraine headaches, with auras to blind me, and vomiting, sensitivity to light and sound. I was 5 years old, and my stepfather would have pizza night, milling his own flour, making thick cheesy gluten pizza, that I would eat and the next day, I would have serious migraines, and my mother & stepfather did nothing about my medical problems. When I was 17 in my first year at college, I was diagnosed with my 2nd known auto-immune disorder, Meniere's disease. I was a elite athlete, a swimmer, and soccer player. And once again my parents didn't think anything of understanding why I had a disorder only older people get. Now after my mother passed from Alzheimer's disease she also suffered with living with gluten. She had a rash for 30 years that nobody could diagnose. She was itchy for 45 years total. My brother had a encapsulated virus explodes in his spleen and when this happened his entire intestines were covered with adhesions, scar tissue and he almost lost his life. He has 5 daughters, and when I finally was diagnosed after being pregnant and my body went into a cytokine storm, I lost my chance to have children, I ended up having Hashimoto's disease, Degenerative Disc disease, and my body started to shut down during my first trimester. I am 6ft tall and got down to 119lbs. My husband and I went to a special immunologist in Terrace, California. They took 17 vials of blood as we flew there for a day and returned home that evening. In 3 weeks, we had the answer, I have Celiac disease. Once this was known, only my father and husband made efforts to change their way of feeding me. At the family cabin, my stepfather & mother were more worried that I would ruin Thanksgiving Dinner. It wasn't until one of my cousins was diagnosed with Celiac disease. They finally looked into getting Gluten Free flour and taking measures to limit "gluten" in meals. He did nothing but ask for me to pay for my own food and wi-fi when I came to the cabin to stay after our house burned down. When he informed my mother, they proceeding to get into a physical fight and she ended up with a black eye. The is just more trauma for me. Sam had no interest in telling the truth about what he wanted. He lied to my mother that he had asked my husband if I could pay for "food" when he asked Geoffrey if I had money to pay for my wi-fi. My mother hates when he spends so much time on the computer so he lied and said I could pay for my own food. I will remind you I weighed 119lbs at this time. (At 6ft) that is a very sick looking person. Neither parent was worried about my weight, they just fought about how cheap my stepfather was. As my mother was diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease in 2014. He had her sign over the will to a trust and added his children. He had no testimonial capacity at the time, so she signed without proper papers. Making this Trust null and void. When I gave my brother my childhood home, my mother stated I would be getting an equal part of inheritance to the house on Race. It currently worth 2.0 million $. I got nothing, and my stepfather has since disowned me b/c of my claim and he knows that my mother would never have left it uneven between my biological brother and myself. She sat me and my husband down, as we lived at the Race Street house and treated and took care of it as our own. My brother took over b/c he was going through a horrific divorce and needed a home so he could get a better custody deal with his soon to be ex-wife who was a Assist DA for Denver. She used the girls against him, and he & I were the primary caregivers. We, Judd and I spent the most time with them pre the divorce. Once Judd moved into the house, he threw all of my mother, grandmother and my family heirlooms out to the Goodwill. Nobody told my mother about this as she was going through cancer treatment and had Alzheimer's disease in her mother and her sister. My stepfather and biological brother took advantage of this matter, as I called a "family council" that my brother just never could make it to at the last moment. All of the furnishing, kitchen ware, everything was in the house my brother just moved into. He had had 2 weddings, I chose to elope b/c my stepfather ruined my brother's first wedding by talking about his relationship with my brother in front of my dad and his entire family, insulting him and having my grandfather leave the ceremony. It was a disaster. My stepfather just plays dumb and blames my father for the slight. I was the only child not to have a wedding. So, my mother and stepfather never had to pay for a thing. My mother had had an agreement with my father he'd pay for college and all medical issues with their kids, myself and Judd. So truly my mother never had to pay for anything big for me in her entire life. I am looking for anyone that has had a similar story, where they grew up in a household that had a baker that regularly milled flour and ate gluten. What happened to you? DId you suffer from different auto-immune diseases b/c of living with a baker using "gluten" Please let me know. I have been looking into legal ways to get my stepfather to give me what my mother had promised, and he erased. Thank you for listening to my story. Jane Donnelly  
    • trents
      Possibly gluten withdrawal. Lot's of info on the internet about it. Somewhat controversial but apparently gluten plugs into the same neuro sensors as opiates do and some people get a similar type withdrawal as they do when quitting opiates. Another issue is that gluten-free facsimile flours are not fortified with vitamins and minerals as is wheat flour (in the U.S. at least) so when the switch is made to gluten-free facsimile foods, especially if a lot of processed gluten-free foods are being used as substitutes, vitamin and mineral deficiencies can result. There is also the possibility that she has picked up a virus or some but that is totally unrelated to going gluten-free.
×
×
  • Create New...