Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Do You Look For In A Doctor?


1desperateladysaved

Recommended Posts

1desperateladysaved Proficient

I have noticed on the forum that we have different ideas of what we want in health care.  Sometimes it is hard to support each other when that is the case.  So on this occasion of that I need to find a new MD (mine retired) I have been thinking about what I want in a caregiver.

 

Here is my list:

 

Respects the patient considering their input is valid.  (After all who knows they symptoms better than the patient?)

 

Listens to the patient:  This means that if they are unsure they will ask questions of the patient, and go hunt up information!  They believe the patient is NOT making things up.

 

They are trained in health care and continue to learn.

 

I like doctors that will try to get to the root of the problem rather than dispensing drugs to mask the symptom.

 

I believe nutrition to be at the basis of healthcare, because of human's design, what they eat and what they do with their body would be most important.

 

One who is not afraid to make the patient responsible for their own healthcare.  By this I mean they ask the patient to make changes in diet and exercise that will improve their life.

 

One that get excited as they realize improvement in their patients.

 

I feel that one that truly cares about the patients can do a better job than a doctor that is trained by the greatest school.

 

 

 

What's your list?

 

 

 

 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Adalaide Mentor

I found a new doctor that I think I'm pleased with last summer, so this is a recent experience for me.

 

I think that due to the nature of our disease we require someone who will treat us as a whole person, rather than compartmentalizing our symptoms. That said, they also need to not be dismissive and attribute every last thing to celiac as that simply isn't helpful. Sometimes, the most seemingly unrelated things are related, as we've all learned and more doctors need to.

 

Someone who accepts that I am knowledgeable about my diseases (probably more than him), and that when I have a firm direction with where a new diagnosis may go I will hit the internet and research the hell out of it. If a doctor is threatened by my knowledge, they are far too arrogant about a piece of paper with their name on it for my money.

 

I also like a doctor who continues his education. Whatever means that is through doesn't matter, so long as it is valid info. I just want my doctor not to be left in the dust because they've been out of med school for 20 years.

 

I don't do pill pushers. I accept that I may have to take some medications, but I've had doctors telling me to take pills for things they couldn't diagnose. Unless I have a firm diagnosis of something and a doctor can explain to me why I need a prescription and how it will help me, I'm not interested, and he needs to respect that.

 

This one is very important. Compassion and respect. I have been treated so poorly. My medical records list somatization disorder, I was told all of my symptoms are from anxiety, and about 3 months before knee surgery I had a doctor tell me I was being "too sensitive" in regards to describing my pain (right before I found a new surgeon). Under no circumstances will I tolerate being disrespected by someone I am paying to care for me.

 

My list isn't really different than yours. It took a little trial and error for me to find a good doctor I like. After trying a few doctors I started looking harder at what I wanted. After looking into a lot of things, and at the time not having insurance that would cover a functional medicine doctor, I decided I would settle on a DO over an MD. This probably will sound terribly discriminatory, but I started looking up pictures of every doctor in my area that accepted my insurance, I was looking for someone 35-45ish. Old enough to have a little experience under their belt, young enough to not be out of touch or out of date. I scored when the best clinic in all of Utah had a doctor that fit that rather odd criteria, made an appointment and he happens to be great. If he wasn't I had a list to work down. Now that I think of it, the only other doctor I've ever had that I liked was a DO, he was my doctor for my girls and me after their pediatrician ran off to CA.

GF Lover Rising Star

I will choose a DO over an MD every time.  In my opinion, they have a more well rounded way of looking at a problem.

 

Colleen

  • 2 weeks later...
LauraTX Rising Star

I will choose a DO over an MD every time.  In my opinion, they have a more well rounded way of looking at a problem.

 

Colleen

I also agree.  DO's are taught to treat the person as a whole, and although some MD's do that as well, it is harder to find.  I will pick a DO over an MD when I am doctor searching.

 

Edit:  I feel I really should add more to this.  I was always the "sickly" one in the family and I have seen many, many doctors over the years. Some ok, some good, some bad, a few really bad.  Luckily my 6 doctors I keep up with regularly are all really good and I like them a lot.  

 

Must haves in a doctor:

 

My doctor has to be able to speak to me at my level.  I am in between their knowledge level and the average person, so if I ask for specific details they need to talk to me in more complicated terms when I ask.  I once had a doctor talk to me like I was an idiot, and when I let him know about my scientific background and asked for more detail, he still gave me the most comically ignorant sounding explanations, so I fired him right there.

 

They need to know what they are doing and display competence and a willingness to broaden their knowledge.  My immunologist will go into great detail and answer any question you have, and my rheumatologist will consult research or other doctors when he puts me on a new medicine because the treatments for my diagnoses conflict each other some time.

 

They need to listen to me and believe what I say- treat me like a human being and family member.  My rheumatologist's office is always busy but when you get in the room with him, it is like you are the only person there.  Same thing with my PCP.  Especially places like my immunologsts office where I am there at least every 4 weeks, developing a relationship with the staff and being treated like family is great to me.  They all know I am a germaphobe and cater to it.  

 

They need to treat the whole me, not just the one system I am seeing them for.  I don't like to take pain medicine unless it is for an acute problem. I like to fix the cause instead.  I already take like 18 pills a day so if they want to add one more it better be for a good reason we can't address another way.

 

Things I can compromise on:

Distance- all my specialists are at least 30 min away, two are an hour plus.

 

Apppointment/waiting times-  When I go to my rheumatologist he is sometimes up to 90 minutes behind schedule.  I always see someone pitching a fit in the waiting room.  But there are shortages of these specialists, I waited six months for a new patient appointment, and people drive half a day from out of state to see this doctor.  Seeing that doctor is still worth it.  Same thing with my primary care doctor- if you want to be squeezed in on days you are sick and they are full on appointments, don't complain that you have to wait 45 minutes to be seen because one of those other patients probably has something terrible going on.  

 

Them not holding my hand-  A lot of people don't take charge of their own health care.  Before I go to appointments I write down what refills I need and questions I have.  If I phone them with a question and don't get a call back, I call them back myself.  You really do need to pay attention to your medicines and what is going on or you can create a dangerous situation for yourself.  Don't just assume it will be done.  While working in pharmacy I saw so many people with a lackadaisical attitude about their own health care, and I feel bad for those people because they are compromising their health. 

RMJ Mentor

I chose my primary care doctor based on the school she attended plus this description she gave of herself:

"It is a joy and a privilege to partner with my patients in helping them achieve their best health possible. I enjoy long-term relationships with my patients. A good physician must combine empathy with good listening and communication skills and a commitment to lifelong learning."

It was a great choice. She had me tested for celiac based on 23andme genetic results plus migraines. She truly does partner with me - we decide things together.

nvsmom Community Regular

Not having a know it all attitude. If a doctor is willing to say "I don't know but I'll find out" that is just wonderful. Almost every doctor I've been to has told me there is notrhing wrong or nothing they can do, and I trusted them so I just got worse and worse. I'm tough - I can take a lot of pain and discomfort - and I let things slide too long on a doctor's say so.

 

Otherwise, I like all or your lists.  :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    2. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
    • trents
      I don't know of a connection. Lots of people who don't have celiac disease/gluten issues get shingles.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.