Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    GliadinX



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
    GliadinX


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Oral And Rectal Challenge Testing Of The Mucosa


ravenwoodglass

Recommended Posts

ravenwoodglass Mentor

There has been some recent debate on whether gluten is absorbed into the system through any mucosa other than the intestines. In the US mucosal testing is unheard of they would rather make us sick for weeks or months to do an expensive and inherently risky endo and biopsy. Other countrys have found that that torture may not be needed and that by using a gluten laden patch or infusion or suppository that the histological changes can be detected in the mucous membranes within a relatively short time. There are many more articles out there a search of rectal or mucosal challenge and celiac will bring them up.

Here is one study on the use of detecting celiac through rectal mucosa challenge off of Pub Med

Open Original Shared Link

And another

Open Original Shared Link

And one last one on nasal mucosa testing

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Daura Damm
GliadinX



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Lakefront Brewery


Nancym Enthusiast

None of those links worked for me!

psawyer Proficient

Those links appeat to have been pasted in from another thread:

Open Original Shared Link

They work there, but long urls are displayed with an elipsis replacing a number of characters in the middle. If the displayed version is pasted, it does not work.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
  psawyer said:
Those links appeat to have been pasted in from another thread:

Open Original Shared Link

They work there, but long urls are displayed with an elipsis replacing a number of characters in the middle. If the displayed version is pasted, it does not work.

They were pasted and I did not realize they would not open after pasting. I'll see if I can correct that. Thanks for posting the link to the other post.

One real good reason for us to get this info out is it would be nice if US doctors knew about some of the less invasive forms of testing and hopefully if people ask their GI doctors about it and show them some of the studies on the validity of mucosal testing we can get it used in the US and more people will be able to be diagnosed without having to be made ill to do so.

Edit I think I was able to fix the problem. Thanks guys seems the world forces me to be more computer literate every day, whether I want to or not.

  • 4 years later...
domesticactivist Collaborator

I just had someone tell me about Cyrex labs cross-reactivity tests and when I went to their site saw that they offer Mucosal Gluten Reactivity Screen that I'd seen mentioned here on this site a couple times. I'm very interested to learn more about this.

Open Original Shared Link

Does anyone have neutral information on the validity of the Cyrex labs tests?

Skylark Collaborator
  On 11/28/2011 at 9:17 PM, domesticactivist said:

Does anyone have neutral information on the validity of the Cyrex labs tests?

That's just salivary IgA. It's no better validated than fecal.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
    Little Northern Bakehouse



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,560
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    paxmax
    Newest Member
    paxmax
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
    Authentic Foods


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
    GliadinX




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
    Little Northern Bakehouse



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wamedh Taj-Aldeen
      I recently reviewed a patient with a positive tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody but negative endomysial antibodies (EMA). The patient is asymptomatic, and duodenal biopsies—taken while on a normal gluten-containing diet—were reported as normal. Given the discordant serology and absence of histological changes, I understand that the probability of coeliac disease is low. However, I would appreciate your guidance on the following: Is routine follow-up required in such a case? What is the risk of progression to overt coeliac disease in the future? Would HLA DQ2/DQ8 typing be useful here to help guide long-term management or exclude the diagnosis confidently? I would be...
    • trents
      @LynnM, when you say, "today, his numbers were high", what numbers do you refer to? Are you speaking of celiac antibody scores? Can you be more specific and can you post the test names, the numbers and the reference ranges for the tests? So, I am understanding you to say that topical exposure to gluten doesn't cause him GI reactions but ingestion of gluten does but at the same time you are attributing the "high numbers" to the topical exposure?
    • Ginger38
      So I recently had blood work and my hemoglobin, hematocrit, protein and alkaline phosphatase were all low. They have never been low in the past but since august of last year I have been on the in and off gluten rollercoaster as I mentioned in previous posts. Should I be concerned with these new findings? I am worried I have made myself really sick and done damage or something this past year 
    • LynnM
      Thank you Scott. My son doesn't have a reaction topically, only when ingested. Interestingly though, the doc told us the face cream getting gluten into his bloodstream doesn't do the damage akin to when gluten is ingested. He had no reaction when using the face cream, it only presented in blood-work. I'm hopeful from all the comments today and will wait for the GI doc to reply. If he is cleared to use it, I will encourage SHIELD to get a gluten-free certification 
    • Scott Adams
      It’s great that you’re taking the time to research products carefully for your son with celiac disease—especially since accidental gluten exposure through skincare can be a real concern for sensitive individuals. Based on the ingredient lists you’ve shared, none of the products appear to contain obvious sources of gluten like wheat, barley, or rye derivatives. Ingredients like glycerin and tocopherols (not listed here but often a concern) can sometimes be derived from wheat, but many manufacturers use plant-based or synthetic sources. SHIELD’s transparency and willingness to share their full ingredient list is a good sign, and their note about not intentionally adding gluten is reassuring. Still...
×
×
  • Create New...