Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    GliadinX



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
    GliadinX


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ttg Numbers


AmandaD

Recommended Posts

AmandaD Community Regular

Hi there - I was just at the doctor's office for my followup since being diagnosed with the TTG test and endoscopy. My doctor mentioned that I "wasn't even that positive" on my bloodtest. She mentioned that the TTG test range was anywhere from 1 to 7 being negative or normal. I had a level of 10.5. (She was telling me that she just diagnosed an asymptomatic Celiac the other day with a ttg level of 130...)

Could someone tell me what this means? My endoscopy showed moderate villi blunting...so I assume I'm just at the beginning of this whole Celiac thing...I'm still confused :rolleyes:

...anyways...if someone could help me interpret that number that'd be great ...thanks again...AmandaD


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Little Northern Bakehouse
Little Northern Bakehouse



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Holidaily Brewing Co.


celiac3270 Collaborator

tTG stands for Trans-tissue glutanamise (bad spelling, sorry). It is among the most reliable serologic test for celiac. A tTG of 130 would be a very high number, obviously, probably meaning severe villous atrophy (severe blunting of the villi). Since the tTG number usually corresponds to intestinal damage, it is logical that a low positive like your number would result in minimal to moderate blunting.

AmandaD Community Regular

celiac3270 - I've heard you're in high school. You sound smarter than the damn doctors.

You should consider going to medical school. :D

  celiac3270 said:
tTG stands for Trans-tissue glutanamise (bad spelling, sorry).  It is among the most reliable serologic test for celiac.  A tTG of 130 would be a very high number, obviously, probably meaning severe villous atrophy (severe blunting of the villi).  Since the tTG number usually corresponds to intestinal damage, it is logical that a low positive like your number would result in minimal to moderate blunting.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

celiac3270 Collaborator

Thank you! I'm a freshman in high school. Actually, I want to be a doctor :)

nettiebeads Apprentice
  celiac3270 said:
Thank you!  I'm a freshman in high school.  Actually, I want to be a doctor :)

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

With your quick mind and amazing grasp of a wide range of subjects, I bet you could be whatever you set your mind on. And if you were to be dr., would you specialize? And let me guess, autoimmune disorders?

nettiebeads Apprentice
  AmandaD said:
Hi there - I was just at the doctor's office for my followup since being diagnosed with the TTG test and endoscopy.  My doctor mentioned that I "wasn't even that positive" on my bloodtest. She mentioned that the TTG test range was anywhere from 1 to 7 being negative or normal. I had a level of 10.5. (She was telling me that she just diagnosed an asymptomatic Celiac the other day with a ttg level of 130...)

Could someone tell me what this means?  My endoscopy showed moderate villi blunting...so I assume I'm just at the beginning of this whole Celiac thing...I'm still confused :rolleyes:

...anyways...if someone could help me interpret that number that'd be great ...thanks again...AmandaD

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Not that positive.... is that like "not that pregnant"?

AmandaD Community Regular

hee...hee...i thought the same thing...

  nettiebeads said:
Not that positive.... is that like "not that pregnant"?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Little Northern Bakehouse
Tierra Farm



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Little Northern Bakehouse


celiac3270 Collaborator

The doctor probably meant borderline--could go either way, since it's not conclusively high, but it doesn't fall in the normal range. But it is phrased oddly :huh::lol:

Claire Collaborator
  celiac3270 said:
Thank you!  I'm a freshman in high school.  Actually, I want to be a doctor :)

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Just don't let Med School spoil you! We all need every good doctor we can get and there are so few of them. Good, intelligient people go to college with the best of intentions and come out brain dead puppets with a prescription pad in their pocket.

Sorry about that. too many bad experiences.

As a matter of fact I wanted to be a doctor (first) or a writer (second) or an interior decorator.

My father said no to med school because women get married and don't use their profession. I wound up as a Rehab Therapist and now work as a news page editor. Not the whole ball of wax - nit close. Claire

celiac3270 Collaborator

I'm hoping I won't be spoiled like that. Maybe I have an advantage, being that I experienced 14 years of misdiagnoses and medications that didn't work before everything was fixed.

AmandaD Community Regular

It's a weird thing, isn't it? When they did the biopsy, however, the damage was conclusive with the diagnosis of celiac sprue. Interesting that the number was so low, though...AmandaD

  celiac3270 said:
I'm hoping I won't be spoiled like that.  Maybe I have an advantage, being that I experienced 14 years of misdiagnoses and medications that didn't work before everything was fixed.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

aikiducky Apprentice

If I've understood everything I've read about this correctly, you really shouldn't read too much into the numbers. Thing is that we all have our individual immune systems that may produce different amounts of antibodies. So two people could have the same amount of damage and be feeling equally sick and miserable, but have very different numbers.

Pauliina

celiac3270 Collaborator

Right--it's not ALWAYS representative of the amount of damage, but it is representative of celiac.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
    Food for Life



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,238
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    gallofamily2k
    Newest Member
    gallofamily2k
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
    Daura Damm


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
    GliadinX




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
    Little Northern Bakehouse



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • chrish42
      I wonder how many doctors are aware of this site and would or should recommend it to their patients?
    • Zuma888
      I just got my test results after a less than 2-week gluten challenge consuming about 5 g of gluten per day on average.  Anti tTG-IgA: <0.2 AU/ml (<8 is negative) IgA: 180 mg/dl (Reference range is 70-400) I previously had been on a gluten-free diet for around 3 years or so, with occasional cheating and not being strict about cross-contamination. I am however still suffering from the effects of the gluten challenge (food sensitivities, slight brain fog, weird stool, fatigue, swollen thyroid, bodyaches). Is this likely to be NCGS rather than celiac disease given the test results and my history? Note: I have one copy of HLA-DQ8.
    • trents
      How long have you been strictly gluten free? Certainly, it would be good to look into vitamin and mineral deficiencies and supplementation. The B vitamins, magnesium and D3 are all very important to neurological health. Unfortunately, it can be difficult to reverse gluten-induced neurological damage damage if it has gone on for a long time. 
    • nataliallano
      Thanks Trents I'm strict with my gluten-free diet now. I just don't feel any better. I'm going to get tested for vitamins and minerals to see if I need some supplements. For sure I got some damage that doctors call Menier's and the only way they treat it is with medicine that does damage my body more than it helps.   
    • Zuma888
      Thank you Scott for your helpful response! Based on this, would you say someone who is on a gluten-free diet - but not strict about cross-contamination and occasional cheating - and tests negative for tTg-IgA while having normal total IgA is not likely to have celiac, even if they have been 'gluten-free' for years?
×
×
  • Create New...