Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Interpreting First Coeliac Serology Results

KCG91

Recommended Posts

KCG91 Enthusiast
KCG91
Posted

Hi all,
 

I had some bloodwork done and I'm a little confused by the results as I haven't yet seen my GP for him to explain them to me. The tests read like this:

Anti TTG (IgA) Tissue Transgl. 128.000u/mL (0 - 6)

IgA Coeliac 1.510g/L (0.8-3.7)

Am I right in thinking the first test indicates coeliac disease, as what I've found online seems to indicate 10+ u/mL as positive? 128 seems really high in comparison! I have no idea what the second line means. Are the values in brackets the expected/normal/healthy ranges?

What is the possible Anti TTG (IgA) range for someone with coeliac disease - as I said, 128 seems crazy when 10 is a positive result.

So confused, why do all the antibodies etc have to sound so similar?!
Thanks in advance.







 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


GF Lover Rising Star
GF Lover
Posted

The numbers in brackets are the ranges.  The TTG is positive, If the " IgA coeliac " test is actually the EMA IgA total serum then that is normal showing the TTG could be a false positive.  You really need to review them with your Doctor who can take the blood tests, any symptoms and your history all into consideration. 

 

All the best.

 

Colleen

KCG91 Enthusiast
KCG91
Posted
  • Author

Thanks Colleen! I thought the TTG was positive but yeah, it's the IgA that's confusing. Seeing the doc on Friday but just trying to do my homework as it's a locum...

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

I would have guessed the IgA coeliac was the total serum IgA, which is a control test to make sure you make enough IgA for your IgA tests to be accurate - you'd want it right in the middle of the range and it is. I don't remember the units but these look different than what I'm used to. Is this in the UK?

 

The EMA IgA is usually done as a ratio... I forget the correct term. When I had a positive EMA it was written as 1:40 without any units.

 

Anyway, your tTG iGA was very positive. Are you going gluten-free now or are they doing a biopsy on you first?  Either way, welcome to the club and I hope you feel better soon.

KCG91 Enthusiast
KCG91
Posted
  • Author

Thanks Nicole! Yes, I'm in the UK which has made understanding the results a bit trickier as most of the information covers the tests done in the US, they seem to be slightly different.
 

I'm having another blood test on Friday - celiac panel maybe? - as my first tests were done at home (England) and I'm now back at university in Scotland and the NHS doesn't share info across the border. When I got my first results back in mid Sept I cut out gluten straight away as I needed all the help I could get for an upcoming marathon (26.2 miles with the runs = not fun). I started eating it again yesterday, so hopefully the two weeks off won't affect the results too much. I'm not keen on the biopsy just yet as it's my final year of uni so I just want to feel better and not mess around with hospitals - I'll probably have it done in a year or so when I have time to feel crap for three months... I just wanted more clarification from the bloods, partly to help 'convince' family and flatmates to take it seriously!

Is there any level of anti TTG IgA where coeliac is pretty much certain and a biopsy might not be so necessary? I read that this was suggested as 100 in kids?

Thank you :)

GF Lover Rising Star
GF Lover
Posted

Because the TTG IgA can also point to other autoimmune diseases, the Doctor will take all tests into account to determine Celiac Disease.  The Doctor can make a differential diagnosis of Celiac and not go forward with the Endoscopy if he believes there are no other issues to consider.  This is completely up to the Doctor. 

 

Good Luck,

 

Colleen

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

At the ICDS, the doctors were saying that a TTG of over 100 means Celiac.  I guess it doesn't get that high with other diseases.  They still want to biopsy, especially adults or patients they think might have other issues.  They can do a colonoscopy at the same time and rule out a lot of additional problems.  The endoscopy isn't an operation.  It takes, at most,  a day of your life. 

 

Keep eating gluten.  If you were only off for 2 weeks, and your TTG was that high, you should be good.  The doctors at the ICDS did a study about Celiacs eating gluten.  They fed Celiacs who had gotten their TTG back to normal gluten for 2 weeks.  At 2 weeks the TTG wasn't positive but 2 (I think 2, might have been 4) weeks later, after stopping the gluten, it was positive.  It takes a while for us to stop making it.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

I was going to say something along the same lines. It is usually the weak positives that can be sometimes be caused by things like diabetes, crohn's, colitis, liver disease or thyroiditis. Your result is about 22 times the upper normal limit. It would be pretty safe to say celiac is the cause.

I hope you feel better soon.

KCG91 Enthusiast
KCG91
Posted
  • Author

Thanks everyone. My family and friends don't really get it yet so this post has stopped me running off to the only person I know with coeliac disease - my ex boyfriend! Not who you want to discuss your insides with ;)

 

My test on Friday is a full blood count so presumably that will clarify things a bit further. If I still want a biopsy that's a 3-4 month wait... My liver, kidney and thyroid functions have already been checked and I don't have the symptoms for Crohn's or colitis. In fact I have hardly any at all (a tiny bit of bloating and cramps and marginal anaemia) which is good in a practical sense but also scary that my immune system has (probably) been secretly been munching on my intestines!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,075
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    MamaJessica
    Newest Member
    MamaJessica
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      My only proof

      By Jmartes71 · Posted

      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      My only proof

      By AlwaysLearning · Posted

      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      Gluten related ??

      By AlwaysLearning · Posted

      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      KAN-101 Treatment for Coeliac Disease

      By Russ H · Posted

      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
    • Scott Adams
      Nicotine Gum For Gluten Symptoms.. Am I Crazy?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      BTW, we've done other articles on this topic that I wanted to share here (not to condone smoking!):    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.