Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gliadin IGA 78


Elli-

Recommended Posts

Elli- Apprentice

Hey guys!

 

Recently diagnosed officially after aoiding gluten for 12 years.  It took me 3 doctors to find someone who would come at the issue with a non-biased POV.  I ended up doing a gluten challenge and got a blood test and biopsy.  Today I got a blood test I took last year prior to the gluten challenge and the Gliadin IGA was 78.0.  I have two questions;

1) Dr who ordered the blood test told me a lot of things that were not accurate abt celiac and ruled it out totally.  With a Gliadin IGA of 78, that’s just flat out wrong, isn’t it?  I mean doesn’t it indicate a liklihood of celiac of like 97%?

2) Whatever diet I was eating for 14 yrs was not adequate to what I need to live with celiac based on this test, right?  Just checking. I think that’s what it means and that I need to tighten up my gluten-free diet a little in light of the dx?  

I know a lotta you guys are serious blood test gurus so I’ll put this out there.  Thanks, fam!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Yep, the doctor who told you to disregard the Gliadin IgA result of 78 was completely wrong!  You should have been referred to a GI for an endoscopy!  Hopefully, you will never see this doctor again.  He is probably misdiagnosing many people and I am just not referring to celiac disease!  

If you have been  “gluten free” for 14 years and got the above result and more recently, a positive biopsy, then you have been doing a poor job.  But do not feel bad, the gluten free diet is hard to master and it sounds like you have had no dietary support!  You have the opportunity to learn and improve.  It is never too late!  

Read the Newbie 101 thread located (pinned at top) “Coping” section of this forum.  Stop eating out for the next six months.  Need food on the run?  Grab some gluten free things like a yogurt or banana at the grocery store.   Get a follow up blood test in six months to see if your tests results are going down.  They might not be normal, but they should be going down.  

Ask us for help or ask your GI for a referral to a dietitian who knows about celiac disease.  

 

squirmingitch Veteran

Always. always, always, always have gluten-free food with you, ALWAYS. Hard boiled eggs, fruits, cheese, raw veggies make great snacks. Never leave home without gluten-free food on you.

Elli- Apprentice
16 hours ago, cyclinglady said:

Yep, the doctor who told you to disregard the Gliadin IgA result of 78 was completely wrong!  You should have been referred to a GI for an endoscopy!  Hopefully, you will never see this doctor again.  He is probably misdiagnosing many people and I am just not referring to celiac disease!  

If you have been  “gluten free” for 14 years and got the above result and more recently, a positive biopsy, then you have been doing a poor job.  But do not feel bad, the gluten free diet is hard to master and it sounds like you have had no dietary support!  You have the opportunity to learn and improve.  It is never too late!  

Read the Newbie 101 thread located (pinned at top) “Coping” section of this forum.  Stop eating out for the next six months.  Need food on the run?  Grab some gluten free things like a yogurt or banana at the grocery store.   Get a follow up blood test in six months to see if your tests results are going down.  They might not be normal, but they should be going down.  

Ask us for help or ask your GI for a referral to a dietitian who knows about celiac disease.  

 

Yeah, I have not been being super strict because I did not know it was celiac disease,  - like I’ll eat gluten-free stuff in a restaurant or whatever and I’m sure some of it was not super clean.  

 

BTW that WAS a GI doctor.  Is that test enough (the 78) plus self reported issues with gluten to dx celiac do you think?  

cyclinglady Grand Master

Well, not according to all the celiac centers around the world.  For a while, they were thinking that a genetic test, a very positive celiac panel and a good response to the celiac diet might be enough to diagnose celiac disease.  They definitely have been implementing this in children in Europe.  It can work.  But for some reason, ( I have not found an answer), they are now back to ordering an endoscopy for a firm diagnosis, even for kids.  Maybe they were missing cancer or other issues like SIBO that can accompany celiac disease.  But that is just layman’s speculation.  As member Gemini states, “I do not wear a white coat.”

Another example is that the University of Chicago used to promote just the TTG tests for screening.  It was supposed to be the best and it would also save money.  Now U of Chicago is listing all the celiac tests.  I guess they figured out that one test did not catch all celiacs (like me) and they left a bunch of sick celiacs undiagnosed.  

Is nothing in life easy?  

You are going to have to decide what is best for you.  

I went though with the endoscopy because I needed to know for sure.  My hubby had been gluten free for 12 years prior.  I knew exactly what a celiac disease diagnosis meant and I was NOT happy with my blood test result.    I was shocked.  I needed to see biopsy results.  I needed to have NO doubt.  But that is me.

Again, you need to determine that for yourself.  I do not know all your health issues, finances, insurance ....you get my drift.  

Had I not had insurance or had to wait 8 months for an endoscopy, I might have just gone gluten free to see if my anemia resolved.   I was pretty desperate.  However, my hubby would be the first to say that I get way more support from family, friends, and yes, medical.   That firm diagnosis can be invaluable.  

I am also glad I did the endoscopy.  My first endoscopy revealed damaged villi.  The second endoscopy reveal healthy villi some five years later.  Unfortunately, it also revealed chronic autoimmune gastritis and a gastric polyp that was not there five years ago.  Knowing where you stand (benchmark) at diagnosis can be a good thing.  I can now keep an eye out for gastric cancer.  

A challenge for just the endoscopy is now 2 weeks.  It might be worth considering.  

Take your time to make an informed decision and one you can live with for the rest of your life.  

I wish you well! 

 

Elli- Apprentice
1 hour ago, cyclinglady said:

Well, not according to all the celiac centers around the world.  For a while, they were thinking that a genetic test, a very positive celiac panel and a good response to the celiac diet might be enough to diagnose celiac disease.  They definitely have been implementing this in children in Europe.  It can work.  But for some reason, ( I have not found an answer), they are now back to ordering an endoscopy for a firm diagnosis, even for kids.  Maybe they were missing cancer or other issues like SIBO that can accompany celiac disease.  But that is just layman’s speculation.  As member Gemini states, “I do not wear a white coat.”

Another example is that the University of Chicago used to promote just the TTG tests for screening.  It was supposed to be the best and it would also save money.  Now U of Chicago is listing all the celiac tests.  I guess they figured out that one test did not catch all celiacs (like me) and they left a bunch of sick celiacs undiagnosed.  

Is nothing in life easy?  

You are going to have to decide what is best for you.  

I went though with the endoscopy because I needed to know for sure.  My hubby had been gluten free for 12 years prior.  I knew exactly what a celiac disease diagnosis meant and I was NOT happy with my blood test result.    I was shocked.  I needed to see biopsy results.  I needed to have NO doubt.  But that is me.

Again, you need to determine that for yourself.  I do not know all your health issues, finances, insurance ....you get my drift.  

Had I not had insurance or had to wait 8 months for an endoscopy, I might have just gone gluten free to see if my anemia resolved.   I was pretty desperate.  However, my hubby would be the first to say that I get way more support from family, friends, and yes, medical.   That firm diagnosis can be invaluable.  

I am also glad I did the endoscopy.  My first endoscopy revealed damaged villi.  The second endoscopy reveal healthy villi some five years later.  Unfortunately, it also revealed chronic autoimmune gastritis and a gastric polyp that was not there five years ago.  Knowing where you stand (benchmark) at diagnosis can be a good thing.  I can now keep an eye out for gastric cancer.  

A challenge for just the endoscopy is now 2 weeks.  It might be worth considering.  

Take your time to make an informed decision and one you can live with for the rest of your life.  

I wish you well! 

 

Thanks for this - it’s very helpful!  Oh yes, I did the endoscopy with this dr and it came neg.  Then switch doctors and did an 8 day gluten challenge and did another endoscopy which was positive.  The reason for my question is...do I need to have a sit down with this doctor and explain that he’s been negligent?  I’ve been through enough GIs to know that this is a systemic problem with doctors not wanting to pursue a dx with celiac.  And I want to make it better for future ppl who might come through his office.  I also have half a mind to ask for my appt fees back for the appointments when he refused to write a gluten-free diet script.  This past year was full of pain that was so extreme I only half remember it - I di recall not being able to think straight and calling his officee demanding morphine - hahahahahaha!  I laugh now but pain makes you do crazy things.  So I want him to stop doing things like this if it is, in fact, negligent.  I don’t want to sue him or anything but he “ruled out” celiac AFTER he had the blood test in his hand AND after I told him I went gluten free because of severe GI issues.  

This is NYC.  If you can’t get world-class medical care here then...it just blows my mind.  

cyclinglady Grand Master

I do not think you can change this doctor.  Confronting him would serve no purpose.    You can report him to the medical board.  You can give an honest review on Yelp, etc.  Be nice and polite so your comments come across as valid.  

I think my first GI caught my diagnosis because he attended a recent conference (never asked as I never went back due to insurance changes).   My new GI has celiac patients (I asked) and is young which probably means he received at least an hour of training about celiac disease while in medical school.  Better yet, he keeps on top of the lastest research. When I walked in for my first appointment, he had already reviewed my chart and ordered the necessary tests for good follow-up celiac care. 

Remember, you are your own advocate.  

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,199
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Stacy M
    Newest Member
    Stacy M
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
    • RMJ
      To evaluate the TTG antibody result we’d need to know the normal range for that lab.  Labs don’t all use the same units.  However, based on any normal ranges that I’ve seen and the listed result being greater than a number rather than a specific number, I’d say yes, that is high! Higher than the range where the test can give a quantitative result. You got good advice not to change your diet yet.  If you went gluten free your intestines would start to heal, confusing any further testing,
    • Bev in Milw
      Scott is correct….Thank you for catching that!      Direct link for info  of fillers.    http://www.glutenfreedrugs.com/Excipients.htm Link is on 2nd page  of www.glutenfreedrugs.com   Site was started by a pharmacist (or 2) maybe 15-20 yrs ago with LAST updated in  2017.  This makes it’s Drug List so old that it’s no longer relevant. Companies & contacts, along with suppliers &  sources would need to be referenced, same amount effort  as starting with current data on DailyMed      That being said, Excipient List is still be relevant since major changes to product labeling occurred prior ’17.           List is the dictionary that sources the ‘foreign-to-us’ terms used on pharmaceutical labels, terms we need to rule out gluten.    Note on DailyMed INFO— When you look for a specific drug on DailyMed, notice that nearly all of companies (brands/labels) are flagged as a ‘Repackager’… This would seem to suggest the actual ‘pills’ are being mass produced by a limited number of wholesaler suppliers (esp for older meds out of  patent protection.).      If so, multiple repackager-get  bulk shipments  from same supplier will all  be selling identical meds —same formula/fillers. Others repackager-could be switching suppliers  frequently based on cost, or runs both gluten-free & non- items on same lines.  No way to know  without contacting company.     While some I know have  searched pharmacies chasing a specific brand, long-term  solution is to find (or teach) pharmacy staff who’s willing help.    When I got 1st Rx ~8 years ago, I went to Walgreens & said I needed gluten-free.  Walked  out when pharmacist said  ‘How am I supposed  to know…’  (ar least he as honest… ). Walmart pharmacists down the block were ‘No problem!’—Once, they wouldn’t release my Rx, still waiting on gluten-free status from a new supplier. Re: Timeliness of DailyMed info?   A serendipitous conversation with cousin in Mi was unexpectedly reassuring.  She works in office of Perrigo, major products of OTC meds (was 1st to add gluten-free labels).  I TOTALLY lucked out when I asked about her job: “TODAY I trained a new full-time employee to make entries to Daily Med.’  Task had grown to hours a day, time she needed for tasks that couldn’t be delegated….We can only hope majorities of companies are as  conscientious!   For the Newbies…. SOLE  purpose of  fillers (possible gluten) in meds is to  hold the active ingredients together in a doseable form.  Drugs  given by injection or as IV are always gluten-free!  (Sometimes drs can do antibiotics w/ one-time injection rather than 7-10 days of  pills .) Liquid meds (typically for kids)—still read labels, but  could be an a simpler option for some products…
    • Ginger38
      So I recently had allergy testing for IGE antibodies in response to foods. My test results came back positive to corn, white potatoes, egg whites. Tomatoes, almonds and peanuts to name a few.  I have had obvious reactions to a few of these - particularly tomatoes and corn- both GI issues. I don’t really understand all this allergy versus celiac stuff. If the food allergies are mild do I have to avoid these foods entirely? I don’t know what I will eat if I can’t  have corn based gluten free products 
×
×
  • Create New...