Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Antibody level numbers ?


DJFL77I

Recommended Posts

DJFL77I Experienced

If someone has a TTG IGA of 10... and another person has 600....

what's the difference?

Does antibody level numbers correlate to immune response strength?

Lower number =  weaker immune response happening and less damage being done?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cristiana Veteran

Hello glutendasher

I'm not very scientific or good at explaining things but does this link help?

https://nationalceliac.org/celiac-disease-questions/i-just-had-a-blood-test-and-my-igg-is-6-it-says-weak-positive-what-does-that-mean-to-me/#:~:text=A person with celiac disease,reason is typically gluten exposure.

From my own experience, I can tell you that in the UK most labs cut off at tTG levels at 100.  My were above 100 and took a long time to come down.   I would have loved to have known what my actual levels were as I was very unwell and I think perhaps they were stratospheric and that is why I took a while to get down to 14, my best "score" so far!  

Consultants use it as a measuring tool to see if you are responding to the gluten free diet and the direction of travel is important.  It should be going down as you recover.  If it goes up again, the usual explanation is gluten exposure.

I hope this is some help. but I'm sure others will chime in.

C.

DJFL77I Experienced

mine was also over 100 at diagnosis.. then 13...  5 months after

RMJ Mentor

Different labs use different units of measure for celiac antibodies, so part of a difference could be that rather than a real difference.

The way the tests work, within a lab, a higher value should mean more antibodies.  However, the level of antibodies does not necessarily correlate with the degree of damage in the intestines or with symptoms.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,599
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jose Mojena
    Newest Member
    Jose Mojena
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Alibu
      I was tested back in 2017 and my TTG-IGA was mildly elevated (an 11 with reference range <4) but my EMA was negative and biopsy was negative. Fast forward to 2 weeks ago where I was like y'know what, I still have so many symptoms and I'm always so sick, I should repeat this, thinking it was not going to be positive.  I also found out through 23 and me that I do have the HLA-DQ2.5 gene so I thought it would be good to repeat given my ongoing symptoms. Well my blood work came back with a ttg-iga level of 152.6 with a reference range of <15 and my EMA was positive and EMA titer was 1:10 with reference range of <1:5. I guess I'm nervous that I'm going to do the biopsy and it's going to be negative again, especially since I also had an endoscopy in 2020, not to look for celiac but just as a regular 5 year thing I do because of all my GI issues, and they didn't see anything then either. I have no idea how long the EMA has been positive but I'm wondering if it's very recent, if the biopsy will show damage and if so, if they'll say well the biopsy is the gold standard so it's not celiac? I of course am doing all the things to convince myself that it isn't real. Do a lot of people go through this? I think because back in 2017 my ttg-iga was elevated but not a huge amount and my EMA was negative and my biopsy was negative, I keep thinking this time it's going to be different. But this time my ttg-iga is 152.6 with reference range <15, and my EMA was positive. BUT, my titer is only 1:10 and I keep reading how most people here had a ttg-iga in the hundreds or thousands, and the EMA titer was much higher. So now I am convinced that it was a false positive and when they do the biopsy it'll be negative.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @linnylou73! Are you claiming this based on a reaction or based upon actual testing?
    • linnylou73
      Sams club membermark columbian coffee is either cross contaminated or the pods contain gluten
    • KimMS
    • Scott Adams
      This varies a lot from person to person. I include foods that are not certified gluten-free but are labelled "gluten-free", while super sensitive people only use certified gluten-free. Both types of products have been found to contain gluten, so there are no guarantees either way: It you are in the super sensitive group, eating a whole foods based diet where you prepare everything is the safest bet, but it's also difficult. Eating out is the the most risky, even if a restaurant has a gluten-free menu. I also include items that are naturally gluten-free, for example refried beans, tuna, pasta sauces, salsas, etc., which have a low overall risk of contamination.
×
×
  • Create New...