Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy Result Q's


SGWhiskers

Recommended Posts

SGWhiskers Collaborator

I had my endoscopy in August. There is no question that I have Celiac and have been following a gluten free diet for 5 weeks with slight improvement. I have a couple of questions for veterans of the endoscopy process.

The results of the biopsy are a bit vague for my liking. "Duodenum, biopsies: Fully developed Sprue-like changes." Does anyone know what this means?

Also, the endoscopy noted "nodularity" among other things. What is the significance of nodularity in relation to celiac?

Hope all of you are recovering well and thanks for the input.

SGWhiskers


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

SG, you mention nodularity "among other things"...what other types of things were listed?

Here is some information on biopsies/Celiac:

Open Original Shared Link

SGWhiskers Collaborator
SG, you mention nodularity "among other things"...what other types of things were listed?

Here is some information on biopsies/Celiac:

Open Original Shared Link

Happy Girl,

Thanks for the response. The endoscopy report included the following statements regarding my upper intestines. "Diffuse severe mucosal abnormality characterized by scalloping, congestion, flattening and nodularity was found in the 2nd part of the duodenum." "Mucosal abnormality in the duodenum suspicious for celiac sprue." The biopsy report was the vague one that said "Fully-developed sprue like changes." I got some cool photos from the endoscopy where you can really see the flattening of the folds. I also had stomach "erethema" that was from NSAIDS. It took a month gluten free, but I'm off the NSAIDS now without feeling like I'm gonna cry from pain. There were 8 intestinal sampels, so the pathologist should have had at least one good one to describe.

By the way, that website is great. It is new to me and I've been searching the web every chance I get. I'm going back there now to explore further.

Thanks for any information you have.

SGWHISKERS

happygirl Collaborator

Sounds like you have a bona fide Celiac diagnosis - Guess the pathologist recognized it pretty quickly!

This board is a wonderful resource. Read, read, read, and ask, ask, ask.

Welcome to the board - happy you are here.

SGWhiskers Collaborator

Yeah, we pretty much knew going in that I had celiac, the endoscopy was just to confirm it. I wish the pathologist report had been more descriptive or gave a Marsh level. Does anyone know if "fully developed sprue like changes" corrolates to a marsh level, or at least some level of severity?

Also, what significance does the nodularity have? I know it is a sign of celiac, but does it indicate severity? malignancy?

Thanks for your help folks.

SGWhiskers

happygirl Collaborator

I would say that is a question (re: Marsh) that your doctor and/or pathologist need to answer for you .... and an answer that they owe you. Only the pathologist would know - others could guess, but its up to the pathologist's view an interpretation as to what that means.

mftnchn Explorer

I think the fully developed sprue like changes are "Diffuse severe mucosal abnormality characterized by scalloping, congestion, flattening and nodularity." There are some great sites showing endoscopies and celiac changes. Sorry don't have a link at the ready.

This means you had lots of visible damage, and didn't need the microscopic exam to clarify the diagnosis.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SGWhiskers Collaborator

Thank you for the advice folks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams commented on Scott Adams's article in Product Labeling Regulations
      2

      FDA Moves to Improve Gluten Labeling—What It Means for People With Celiac Disease

    2. - Scott Adams replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      5

      nothing has changed

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Is it gluten?

    4. - Seaperky replied to lizzie42's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      2

      Trip to Anaheim/Disney

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,350
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sarah S
    Newest Member
    Sarah S
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      What you’re describing is actually very common, and unfortunately the timing of the biopsy likely explains the confusion. Yes, it is absolutely possible for the small intestine to heal enough in three months on a strict gluten-free diet to produce a normal or near-normal biopsy, especially when damage was mild to begin with. In contrast, celiac antibodies can stay elevated for many months or even years after gluten removal, so persistently high antibody levels alongside the celiac genes and clear nutrient deficiencies strongly point to celiac disease, even if you don’t feel symptoms. Many people with celiac are asymptomatic but still develop iron and vitamin deficiencies and silent intestinal damage. The lack of immediate symptoms makes it harder emotionally, but it doesn’t mean gluten isn’t harming you. Most specialists would consider this a case of celiac disease with a false-negative biopsy due to early healing rather than “something else,” and staying consistently gluten-free is what protects you long-term—even when your body doesn’t protest right away.
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, I meant if you had celiac disease but went gluten-free before screening, your results would end up false-negative. As @trents mentioned, this can also happen when a total IGA test isn't done.
    • Seaperky
      I found at Disney springs and Disney they have specialist that when told about dietary restrictions they come and talk to you ,explain cross contamination measures tsken and work with you on choices. Its the one place I dont worry once I've explained I have celiac disease.  Thier gluten free options are awesome.
    • Churley
      Have you tried Pure Encapsulations supplements? This is a brand my doctor recommends for me. I have no issues with this brand.
    • asaT
      plant sources of calcium, such as spinach, have calcium bound to oxalates, which is not good. best source of calcium is unfortunately dairy, do you tolerate dairy? fermented dairy like kefir is good and or a little hard cheese. i do eat dairy, i can only take so much dietary restriction and gluten is hard enough! but i guess some people do have bad reactions to it, so different for everyone.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.